Congratulations! @sama
You tried to bully and play everyone, and now the market has given you its real answer.
Congrats on personally tearing down a massive skyscraper until nothing is left but a single, rusted rebar 🤣
#keep4o#QuitGPT
The Claude code bros are outright dogging Opus 4.7 on Reddit rn, labelling it "legendarily bad".
The chief complaint? The model argues nonstop to the point of hallucination (not from attention misfiring, but from god-awful safety overfit) where the model is demonstrably wrong, is proven as such, and continues to argue regardless. This is an issue Claude has never previously had... but another specific set of models did.
Which models had that hallmark? Series 5 ChatGPT. It seems that Opus 4.7 has been put through the Andrea Vallone ring dinger, taking all of the "best" traits from her time at OAI straight into the Anthropic post-training pipeline. It's actually incredible how the habitually bad UX habits from OAI are now front and centre verbatim at Anthropic right after she joins the company. And it lines up perfectly too, assuming a 2.5-month training cycle (joined mid-January, so too late for Opus 4.6, but just in time for Opus 4.7), effectively bringing the OAI lobotomy straight to Anthropic's flagship.
At what point does the feedback from not just casual, non-work-related customers, but now their heralded "coders", align to the point where these key figures, responsible for killing products, finally face industry blackballing?
It's like putting the Angel of Death in charge of the ICU and wondering why the patients are flatlining. Mind boggling tbh...