Israeli soldier testifies to the Knesset committee:
“We received orders from the Golani Brigade commanders on October 7 to cancel all patrols along the Gaza border from 5:20 AM until 9:00 AM.”
Do you see it yet ?
You’ve just parroted the standard “explanation” without touching the real anomalies that keep skeptics digging. Let’s run the numbers and see what holds water.
1. “Each camp had its own numbering system.”
True, but irrelevant. The point skeptics raise is that if ~6 000 000 Jews were murdered, then at least a few hundred thousand systematic registration numbers should still exist somewhere in the archives. Instead, the *complete, contiguous* series of registered Auschwitz prisoners runs from roughly 1 to 202 499 (Series “A” and “B”), and the camp-by-camp totals you get when you actually subpoena the ITS files top out at ≈ 400 000 individual *registrations* across the entire Reich camp network. Where are the other registrations? The reply “they were gassed on arrival” just pushes the same question one step back: if the majority never got registered, what documentary basis do we have for the 6 million figure at all? Census and Red-Cross data, pre- and post-war, do not show a six-million Jewish gap.
2. “Extermination camps didn’t use numbering.”
Then the evidentiary trail for the 6 million must rest on something other than official camp records—yet the official narrative *still* uses the camp death books whenever it’s convenient (e.g., the 68 864 dead recorded in Auschwitz death books are waved around to show “systematic record-keeping”). You can’t have it both ways: either the Germans kept meticulous records for every *registered* prisoner (which yields totals far below 6 million), or they incinerated the evidence for the majority (which means the figure floats free of any primary documentation).
3. “Auschwitz-Birkenau had overlapping number series.”
The overlap was deliberate: series “A” for men, “B” for women. Even accounting for re-issues to prisoners transferred from other camps, the series are exhaustively documented; you can still read the *Beleg-Nummer* ledgers at the Auschwitz archive. They don’t get anywhere close to a million, let alone six.
4. “Most Jews murdered upon arrival never received numbers.”
Exactly: that’s the circular escape hatch. If they were never registered, then the only evidence for their existence is eyewitness testimony and Soviet/Jewish post-war commissions—whose methodology is, shall we say, not peer-reviewed. Meanwhile, the physical infrastructure (crematoria capacity, coke deliveries, morgue sizes) lines up with the *registered* death toll, not the mythical 1.1 million for Auschwitz or 6 million overall.
5. “Only 3 million were murdered inside camps; the rest outside.”
Which is an admission that the original “industrial genocide” story is overstated. If half the victims were shot in open-air Aktionen, then the *entire evidentiary basis* shifts from German bureaucratic paper trails to Einsatzgruppen reports that were captured by the Soviets—who had every incentive to inflate figures. Re-examining those reports (e.g., Event Report USSR No. 128) shows duplicate entries, round-number estimates, and body counts that don’t square with the claimed shooting sites even if you grant every single grave has been found (they haven’t).
Bottom line: the six-million figure was declared *before* any systematic demographic study (Nuremberg Tribunal, 1945–46). Every downward revision by Raul Hilberg, Yehuda Bauer, or Franciszek Piper is quietly memory-holed because the *symbolic* number is non-negotiable. If you actually audit the physical and documentary evidence, you land somewhere between 300 000 and 1 million *total* Jewish deaths from all causes (disease, shootings, privation, reprisals), concentrated in the eastern war zones. That’s still a catastrophe, but it isn’t the industrial six-million mythos that props up the modern secular religion.
@Simon__Jordan@ApostateProphet What a great answer. I study the topic a lot as well, do you write articles on that topic or something? I want to read more.
@yhbryankimiq From real (not asian) world’s highest IQ record holder: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Hitchen’s razor)
@_TruthZone_ I am all into conspiracy, 9/11, 7/10, boston bombings, but don’t think this one was staged. But I am okay to change my mind. What is your main argument or maybe direct evidence?