@DuskFoundation@sozu_dusk That's really great! But when are we getting back the funds after the roll back of the bridge? I was in the unfortunate ones that bridged after the "famous" Saturday.
BREAKING:
Israel is dropping white phosphorus bombs on civilian areas in Al-Tiri, South Lebanon.
These are internationally banned munitions, and Israel is using them against civilians.
By the way, the summit failed to condemn the attacks launched from the territories of those countries against Iran.
Obviously, civilian infrastructure should not be a military target, but this key fact cannot be ignored. Multiple videos and reports show US artillery operating from these countries and striking Iranian soil.
We are facing a clear issue of consistency. As I’ve mentioned before, there is a long history of friction between these countries and Iran, which lies at the root of this.
Anyone reading this communiqué would think Iran simply decided to open fire on its neighbors for no reason.
However, the section condemning the blockade of the Hormuz caught my attention, as they failed to do the same in several historical episodes I will cite here:
1US Naval Blockade of Cuba (1962 – Missile Crisis): The US declared a 'naval quarantine' (effectively a total blockade), preventing any Soviet ship from reaching Cuba. This was exactly the closure of a maritime passage to pressure an adversary.
2Coalition Naval Blockade against Iraq (1990–2003): The US and its allies (including the UK, France, etc.) imposed a total maritime blockade in the Gulf to enforce UN sanctions following the invasion of Kuwait. Ships were intercepted, searched, or sunk, effectively closing access to Iraq for over a decade.
3 Mining of Vietnamese Ports (1972, Operation Pocket Money): The US mined Haiphong and other ports, effectively closing maritime access to North Vietnam. Thousands of neutral vessels were affected.
I would need several posts to cover every episode, such as the 1956 Anglo-French-Israeli intervention in the Suez Canal.
It’s not just the West; all sides invoke 'international law' as a rhetorical weapon. The real difference usually comes down to who has more naval power to impose their order.
Sánchez might be a disaster for Spain’s internal politics, but at least rhetorically, he is the only EU leader speaking out against Israel’s Genocide. But also the criminal, reckless, and unlawful bombings done by Israel and USA.
@TOzgokmen Do you think Russia and/or China will help Iran? If it will be like all against Iran, without help from Russia or China, it will end before that I guess.
@TOzgokmen Fair reasoning. What do you think of the idea that maybe he decides to attack before voting for the mid-terms, maybe around September? Also this way doesn't "interfere" with the World cup beginning in June? :)
@TheWhiteWhaleHL Looks good the video, it seems you found the right tool to generate videos :). About the topic you talk in this first video, do have any book recommendations?
@litecoin I still see the nuanced sarcasm of the intern 😅.. Guess he was forced to some self control courses and some Tibetan's bowl sounds, but ready to raise from the depths once Ltc will be back on the top 15 again. 😁