Tyler King

Know your limits and exceed them frequently~If you're not living on the edge you're taking up too much space~May the force be with you!!

[Bloodstained Men @BloodstainedMen]

The ruthless #circumcision doctors never ask themselves about the cumulative effect of sending home a nation of angry, wounded babies into the world, as if there could not possibly be consequences from the physical, psychological, and spiritual damage from this traumatic amputati

[Eric Clopper @AttorneyClopper]

Defenders of childhood genital cutting often rely on false premises and strawman arguments.

"Circumcised females" (i.e., victims of Type Ia FGM) can also urinate, orgasm, and procreate. But Type Ia FGM is still unethical and harmful.

Likewise, although circumcised males can still "urinate, ejaculate, and procreate," those functions are not the only criteria of harm.

My non-profit @IntactGlobalinc doesn't think these dangerous tribal rituals belong in healthcare.

[Eric Clopper @AttorneyClopper]

It should be a red flag to the medical community that newborn males need more blood clotting agents because they routinely undergo what a prominent pediatric urologist calls a "dangerous tribal ritual": https://t.co/S0Az68hNjz

[JM&Co @JMIndependent]

Male phallus without a foreskin is like an eye without an eyelid

The foreskin functions like a protective "eyelid" for the glans, preserving its mucosal sensitivity. Its removal (circumcision) disrupts these natural connections.

Male foreskin function/ purpose:-

•Protective covering of the glans
•Maintenance of glans moisture
•Reduction of friction against the glans
•Specialised touch receptors and fine-touch sensation
•Movable skin for a gliding mechanism during sexual activity
•Additional penile skin coverage
•Protection of the urinary opening (meatus) from constant exposure
•Natural lubrication retention
•Shielding of the glans from abrasion against clothing
•Contribution to erogenous sensation
•Cushioning effect during sexual activity
•Expansion and accommodation during erection
•Preservation of mucosal tissue
•Preservation of the frenular region when not removed
•Reduction of keratinization (thickening) caused by constant exposure
•Self-covering function when flaccid
•Immune-related tissue containing immune cells
•Sensory feedback from stretch and movement of the foreskin
•Facilitation of masturbation through skin mobility
•Retention of warmth and humidity around the glans
•Protection of the developing glans during childhood
•Contribution to overall penile skin reserve

[Reed @ReedNelson9]

Why do we as a species continue to kill our most vulnerable with this sadistic stone-age blood ritual?

It is astonishing how many people have cultural blinders on and don't even see the harm.

https://t.co/sth7FEZ9m9

[Martha Bueno @BuenoForMiami]

Women defending the mutilation of boys is wild to me!

My original post was about people exactly like you, @Libertys_Belle. You know cutting a child’s genitals is wrong, but you’ll still defend cutting a child “a little bit.”

You blocked me because deep down, you know I’m right

[Dont Tread On @DontTreadUpon]

Travis is a circumcised gay man & has convinced himself that genital mutilation of non consenting baby boys is AOK because in his words “uncircumcised penises are a health concern”. Travis is missing his manhood & is coping the best he can. Don’t be a weak circumdufus like Travis

[Martha Bueno @BuenoForMiami]

She’s right on all counts.

[Ringo HumaniStarr || ℙ𝕖𝕒𝕔𝕖 & 𝕃𝕠𝕧𝕖 ✌🏼☮️♥️ @Ringo_Humanista]

I'm restoring, because I'm not happy about being circumcised, and I have every right.
You don't speak for all circumised men, dumbass.

[Martha Bueno @BuenoForMiami]

Many people think circumcision is “harmless.” Children sometimes die as a result—on average, approximately 100 babies in America every year.

Stop mutilating your sons. They deserve the same protection you give your daughters.

[Bloodstained Men @BloodstainedMen]

Intact Global, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against the state of Colorado that would require the state to enforce the genital mutilation statute that protects girls from circumcision to also protect boys.

[Intactivisme France @Intactivisme_Fr]

If you want to get rid of pedophilia then get rid of infant circumcision. This mutilation is a fetish for a lot of disgusting pedophiles such as Brian Morris. No baby should be altered physically.

[Bloodstained Men @BloodstainedMen]

Friends don't let friends circumcise. You can warn your friends, relatives, neighbors and loved ones, circumcision is not medicine, never was, never will be.

[Eric Clopper @AttorneyClopper]

Today is the day. Join us at 10:00am MT as we announce @IntactGlobalinc's second lawsuit from the West Steps of the Colorado State Capitol.

[Dawn Woodward @woodwardianone]

@mygirlystuff2 A huge factor is circumcision. Without the foreskin glide, there's too much friction & within a few years or decades the woman will begin to get "headaches" etc. Americans need foreskin restoration & to stop this evil practice. "Sex As Nature Intended It" is a book about this.

[Intact America @intactamerica]

A UK Green Party working group is considering whether non-medically necessary circumcision should wait until a child can decide for himself.

Bodily autonomy is becoming harder to ignore.

Read: https://t.co/G57d8pUe9w

[Dawn Woodward @woodwardianone]

@OliverGrint24 @LBC @BenKentish Great job talking about it! The fact is that no one needs this stupid procedure & it's pushed by immoral profiteers. I'm sorry the choice wasn't left to you, as it should've been. Thank you for your bravery in speaking out!

[Oliver L @OliverGrint24]

Yesterday I went on @LBC to talk about circumcision (as you do). Most men don’t feel comfortable discussing it. That’s why I made myself call in, despite the nerves. Thanks @BenKentish for giving me the time to share my story.

Petition below if you agree: https://t.co/nuAppuvTIs

[Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 @jacksonhinkle]

ISRAEL DID THIS!

ZIONISM IS EVIL!

[Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald]

With Tulsi Gabbard's new revelations about US bio labs in many countries around the world including Ukraine, it's fascinating recall the bizarre series of events that gave rise to this controversy in the first place:

In May of 2022, some of us began asking whether the US had bio labs in Ukraine, what they were for, and why the US had them there. For asking those questions, we were instantly branded as "pro-Russian conspiracy theorists" in official Ukrainian intel reports, on our Wikipedia pages, by countless media outlets, etc. This was and remains one of the most bizarre episodes I've ever seen.

Before May 2022, when we asked those questions, barely anyone had ever thought about let alone asked about "bio weapons in Ukraine"! I certainly hadn't. Like most people, I had never mentioned a word about it because it had never occurred to me we had them there.

But then, Marco Rubio summoned Victoria Nuland to the Senate and asked her in a televised hearing under oath about these "rumors," clearly expecting her to immediately debunk them as obvious Kremlin lies and to proclaim the US had no such bio labs in Ukraine.

Instead, Nuland did the opposite! She *confirmed* key aspects of these "rumors," and she explicitly warned that the US has several "bio research labs" in Ukraine that are so dangerous that they must not be allowed to fall into Russia's hands.

When some of us heard Nuland's rather shocking admission -- the first-ever disclosure about these labs -- we of course asked: wait! what? Why does the US have bio labs in Ukraine, and what are the US and Ukraine doing in those labs that make them (in Nuland's eyes) so dangerous?? (Note: nobody ever suggested that the presence of these bio labs in Ukraine justified the Russian invasion; we just wanted answers about these US bio labs that Nuland had casually divulged).

We never got real answers. We got smear campaigns. To this day, our names are formally attached to claims that we spread "conspiracy theories" for asking about these labs even though it was Victoria Nuland herself who was the one who accidentally revealed them for the first time in a Senate hearing in response to a shocked Marco Rubio. They then quickly tried shutting down any questioning by pretending that Nuland never said this, and it was just a bunch of paid Kremlin mouthpieces who were spreading lies.

You see the same tactics now being against Tulsi for releasing this new intelligence report. Watch the Nuland testimony in question: