@DrRitaDed Imagine thinking you’re educated when you’re not even educated on the fact that there’s a huge difference between knowledge and intelligence. You can have 10 PhD’s and still be intellectually retarded.
@MistyJernigan17 @Dad_2_The_Bone@Pat72852006 The only reason you have the make believe things you call “rights” is because men enforce that delusion. If even 3% of men woke up and decide to enslave all women because they wanted a sandwich then that becomes reality. However, 100% of wahmen couldn’t enslave even 2% of men.
@Dad_2_The_Bone Be silent, Mr. Gigasimp. Nobody who matters gives a shit about what your little bitch ass has to say about anything. The joke is funny. You’re just a pussy who takes jokes so hard you’d think it was the dick you rode in on.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp No. Morality is a concept, like math, logic etc. Concepts such as these are universal. Meaning they exist and are always true. But as concepts they do not exist external a mind. But humans haven’t always existed. So that would require the logical assumption of an external mind.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp External justification based on an unchanging logical framework. “Feelings alone” rejects this completely, making your worldview anti-logical and incoherent.
If you think that feelings don’t change without reason then you should try talking to a woman once lol. Jk.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp 100% of all feelings that are not grounded in objective reality will change.
Yes, it does. For example: I disowned my own brother and am completely indifferent to his existence because of his prior behavior towards me.
Love is always conditional never universal.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp “Fun” is subjective because it doesn’t exist in reality external a mind. Without a mind to acknowledge this action being “fun” then “fun” does not exist.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp Based on what? How do you justify actions to be good or bad when feelings don’t even exist outside your own mind? Feelings change with the wind, so the bases of your own morality could change 180° in an instant. “I feel = justified” is a very flawed argument.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp Correct. “Objective morality” is an incoherent term because “objective” means it exists external the mind. Morality does not exist external a mind, it is wholly subjective. However, morality not grounded in objective reality is anti-logical. Was morality invented or discovered?
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp Yes, I have moral feelings on the matter. It is an extreme hypothetical I am using to test your logic and moral grounding or lack thereof. Respectfully.
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp None of them, because both of the X’s could be either genocide or feeding the hungry. And just because two people agree on what is moral does not make it true.
How do we know that something is objectively moral and true?
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp Okay, how then would your feelings be more valid than mine? We can’t both be the ultimate arbiter of morality. So what is the basis for your worldview? What is the objective standard that makes you correct and me incorrect?
@Your_Wrongest@xonphused@AwakenChirp My feelings are telling me that the genocide of Christians is good and moral ought for the betterment of society as a whole. Are my feelings wrong? Why?
@xonphused@AwakenChirp Not all would agree that doing those things is bad. That’s just your subjective preference that they do. But even if only a fraction of morality was discovered that would mean it always existed, correct?