wicmac

[wicmac @macwic]

@MLSMoves That’s the spot Richards will take. So all will be good.

[wicmac @macwic]

@MLSMoves What’s the problem? Defense?

[wicmac @macwic]

@golz_tv Kudos to Berhalter!

[wicmac @macwic]

@WorldCupMedia GOAT

[wicmac @macwic]

@Castro1021

[wicmac @macwic]

@Varticoo Make it 8

[wicmac @macwic]

@NateSilver538 Honest question: If one wanted to cheat in elections, wouldn't it look like how it's handled in California?

[wicmac @macwic]

@NateSilver538 Why could that be, Nate?

[wicmac @macwic]

@sport_tvppl Super wyczyn!

[Amy Reichert @amyforsandiego]

As a California licensed investigator, I asked a simple question: If someone wanted to commit election fraud at scale, in Los Angeles and steal the mayoral election what vulnerabilities in the system would they look for?

They would look at ballots being counted long after Election Night, when they know how many votes they need. Look at the chain of custody…where are these ballots arriving from up to 7 days after the election? The United States Postal Service is UNIONIZED and we are supposed to believe they aren’t corrupt? Then look below at the lack of a voter signature requirement on the ballot itself, with an unverified “witness signature” a freakin’ smiley face passes as voter ID in California?

Fraudsters would also look at low-propensity voters whose ballots may be less likely to be tracked or questioned and steal those from apartment complexes.

Don’t even get me started on counterfeit ballots. If you think that isn’t possible you haven’t heard of fake driver’s licenses made in China.

Fraud can happen anywhere humans are involved. Pretending vulnerabilities don’t exist is not election security. Gaslighting people that significant fraud isn’t happening when we see in real time elections being stolen in California is some Orwellian B.S.

Any news organization still insisting fraud is impossible isn’t doing journalism. The real question is whether they are willing to investigate potential weaknesses in the system with the same intensity they use to dismiss them.

[Alexi Lalas @AlexiLalas]

Hello, Chicago. Let’s dance.

[Kay Adams @heykayadams]

Because at least Wisła Kraków is back. Ekstraklasa. Baby steps.

[wicmac @macwic]

@usmntaut Good for him! He is better than most think!

[wicmac @macwic]

@AlexiLalas That's fine. Only 3 guys aren't clear.

[wicmac @macwic]

@Kiradavis

[wicmac @macwic]

@paulmitche11 @ZavalaA @AP @SteveHiltonx What if the amount of outstanding ballots increased? Then gaining 70k a few times would be sufficient.

[Dennis Morton @DKeidenis]

@CNN The fact that you add “baseless” is proof you’re not actual news. Actual news does’t boldly take a side right in the headline. It’s propaganda by definition.

[Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD @houmanhemmati]

🗳️ Many have been asking me describe the potential signature verification loophole for Los Angeles mail in ballots.

It says: “If a voter is unable to sign, the voter can make a mark witnessed by one person.”

Here, the person drew a happy face & “witnessed” it with a scribble. That scribble isn’t validated as being a real person. No name, nothing.

While a happy face may draw scrutiny, a plain line would not.

This could hypothetically enable mass harvesting where the voter never fills out, signs or even sees their own ballot.

We should be told how many ballots show up without the voter’s signature.

[wicmac @macwic]

@grok @MattFinnFNC Are people comparing the signatures or AI/machines?