Nigel Farage said mass deportations are an impossibility, Rupert Lowe said millions will go.
Nigel Farage says you cant fight islam because we will lose, Rupert Lowe said he will end political Islam.
Nigel Farage supports sending British troops tp the front lines of Ukraine, Rupert Lowe is against foreign wars.
Nigel Farage doesn't want to introduce the death penalty, Rupert Lowe will hang Axel Rudakabana, and many people like him, publicly.
Nigel Farage and Reform UK are under MULTIPLE investigations into their dodgy finances, Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain aren't.
Nigel Farage thinks anyone can be British, Rupert Lowe doesn't.
Reform UK have foreign lobbyist groups such as Reform friends of Isrsel, Restore Britain doesn't.
These are two inherently different parties so for you to say "splitting the vote" is a false statement.
I know who I'm voting for, and it's Restore Britain.
THIS MORNING. RAF FAIRFORD. 00:45.
A pensioner called 999. Not MI5. Not GCHQ. A villager spotted three suspicious vans heading toward a US bomber base and dialled 999.
Five men arrested under the Explosives Act, then upgraded to Section 5 of the Terrorism Act: preparation of a terrorist act. Three vans. 85 homes evacuated at 1.30am. Army bomb disposal robot inside a 400-metre cordon. Counter Terrorism Policing now leading. Major incident declared.
The operation was not intelligence-led. A resident made a phone call. That is what stopped it.
The IRGC already told you this was coming.
In July 2026, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps issued a formal statement naming RAF Fairford specifically as "a legitimate target." They cited the US B-1B bombers striking Iran from British soil, authorised first by Keir Starmer in March 2026 and continued by Prime Minister Andy Burnham. They published the threat. They named the base. Seven months later five men turned up at it after midnight. The intelligence services had no warning. A villager did.
Now the part they really do not want you to know.
Last November the National Crime Agency arrested a man in central London on a German warrant. His name is Mohammed Naim. Son of Basem Naim, Hamas politburo member, former Gaza health minister, US-sanctioned terrorist. Mohammed served as personal bodyguard to Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh from 2006. He was photographed doing it. AFP published the images. In 2010 Egyptian police arrested him for smuggling weapons and gold through tunnels into Gaza. That arrest was documented. On record. Available to any Home Office caseworker.
In 2015 he walked into a British Home Office and claimed asylum. They gave it to him.
Theresa May's Home Office granted him indefinite leave to remain. He later received full British citizenship. Changed his name. More than once. Settled in suburban England as an IT consultant. Raised a family. The state never looked twice.
In summer 2025 he travelled to Berlin. Collected five handguns and ammunition from a Hamas contact. Drove to Vienna. Stored the weapons in a storage unit. Recorded a propaganda video announcing the plot. Target: Jewish community centres, Israeli diplomats, pro-Israel events across Germany and Austria. Timed for the second anniversary of October 7.
Mossad and German intelligence foiled it. British intelligence did not find it.
A court granted him anonymity for 100 years. He sits in a British cell while Germany waits for extradition. The state that gave him the passport is now hiding his identity. Indefinitely.
Now look at what your Prime Minister found time for this morning.
While five men were arrested at gunpoint outside an airbase the IRGC had publicly threatened, while 85 families were evacuated in the middle of the night, while bomb disposal robots crawled through vans a mile from sleeping US bomber crews, Andy Burnham was on the BBC.
He was asked about Daniel Thomas. A father of four. A former soldier. A working man. And Burnham said it is "hard to conclude" he is "anything other than someone who has racist views."
Instant. Confident. No hesitation. No "inappropriate to comment."
Asked about five terrorism arrests at a US bomber base: "It would be inappropriate to comment further whilst investigations are ongoing."
Asked about 85 families evacuated at midnight with zero intelligence warning: he is "being kept updated."
Asked about a Hamas weapons operative handed a British passport who moved guns across Europe: silence.
He found the words to attack a British father in seconds. He cannot find words for the people who were almost blown up this morning.
This is the government that calls you racist for wanting to know who is crossing the border. This is the government that houses asylum seekers in better accommodation than 75% of the working families funding it. This is the government that gave a Hamas weapons operative a British passport and then a century of anonymity when he was caught. This is the government that sat on an IRGC threat against British soil and left a pensioner to do the job of the security services.
They are not failing to protect you. They are choosing not to.
A villager stopped the attack this morning. Not the Prime Minister. Not MI5. Not the Home Office. A resident who looked out of a window at 00:45 and knew something was wrong.
They were right. This government was asleep.
Every fact in this post is verified and sourced. Screenshot it. Share it. They will not tell you. So we have to.
The 20th century world wars taught two lessons at once: do not sleepwalk into a general war, and do not assume an expansionist power will stop if left unopposed.
Perversely, neither of those lessons apply today to Russia. When the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia shrank and NATO - a military organisation - expanded to its borders. Ergo, the EU/NATO is the expansionist power, not Russia. In reality, Russia lost its empire even as the EU became an Empire, allied with militarist, expansionist NATO.
Europe is not sleepwalking into a war with Russia, it is charging into it with blazing eyes stretched wide open. The sheer insanity of this is incomprehensible - unless one believes the EU wants war purely in order to halt the "far-right" from coming to power in Germany and France, which would mean an end to the tyranny of the Von Der Leyen Imperialist Commission.
Imagine the wicked, murderous, anti-democratic implications of that. A war which will kill millions of Europeans is deliberately engineered by the EU and NATO in order to thwart the democratic process.....
Insane as this sounds, it DOES appear to be their monstrously evil ambition, and our unfortunate reality.
The idea that Russia or any other country is going to attempt to invade and occupy Britain is laughable. We are a nuclear power, Five Eyes member, NATO member, and one of the closest allies of the United States.
The Russians can’t even annex a handful of Ukrainian oblasts without sustaining millions of casualties, let alone take on a NATO nuclear power - a fact Putin himself has recognised publicly.
What Rees-Mogg is really saying is we must die for the Donbas region.
It is offensive folly to ask Britons to die for a region that has zero relevance to us whilst our own country is being handed over to foreigners against our will. If the British establishment tries to conscript us for a war with Russia, they are in for a nasty surprise.
Piddington 2024: “Ahhh it feels good to virtue signal and vote for something that makes me feel morally just. Such a lovely feeling. I’ll go for a nice, safe walk now in my 100% white English village and bask in my own moral grandstanding.”
Piddington 2026: “Hang on a minute, you can’t bring these savages here! Surely they can go in the working class towns so we can carry on feeling virtuous whilst avoiding the left wing savage importations we voted for? What the hell is going on?!”
@RAC_Care 24 hours on the side of the road. We told you we have no food and limited water, freezing cold in a van and nothing from any of you. It’s a joke. We’ve been promised a hire car, a hotel for the night, breakdown recovery vehicle and nothing! Never ever go with the RAC
95% of all taxpayers earn less than £100,000 per year. They will all be in favour, and this policy alone would make the country more productive - spoke to my sister today and she's reducing work to stay under £100k.
The only losers from this policy are people who don't work.
But the parents who are on benefits DO NOT WORK - so they can - and I can’t stress this next bit enough - LOOK AFTER THEIR OWN KIDS?!?! Wtaf?!
If you were to do this - then surely the people who NEED 30 hrs of free child care would be families with both parents in work who are paying in more than they take out but still close to the margin and feeling the pinch.
These Labour shit-for-brains MPs are so intolerably inept.
If I say this man is "from a rapey paedo culture", I'm a racist. But he can defend himself in court by saying he's "from a rapey paedo culture". Make it make sense.
🚨NEWS: It has been revealed that while Kier Starmer was director of public prosecutions 13,000 rape gang members and paedophiles were let off with warning letters
[@rapeganginquiry ]
Decades telling British people that having kids is low status. Telling girls that to get pregnant is the worst thing that can happen. Social pressure to get half of all young people to go to university to then become heavily indebted, with it being a total waste of 3-5 years of their prime years.
Decades terrifying people that the world is going to burn up. Decades telling people the world is overpopulated and therefore immoral to have children—but this doesn’t apply to non Western countries. Decades of an economic system that prioritises putting people in work over family formation.
Yeah. Guess what? People stop having babies.