Postdoc @uwcip; social psych PhD @USC. I study misinformation correction and how people make judgments of truth and risk. Otherwise probably in the ⛰. She/her
@anish_koka It’s also not fair to say the control group is the best at one year. It’s definitely not significantly different than high dose AMT on that graph and potentially not low dose.
@anish_koka The mean for high dose AMT-130 at 12 months is different between the two graphs because the Ns change. The first graph has N=17 at one year, the second has N=14. Not familiar enough with the context of these graphs to know why that is - second one might be interim data?
Join us on October 16 for our Science for Society webinar! A panel featuring Lisa Fazio @lkfazio, Mubashir Sultan, and Maddy Jalbert @MaddyJalbert will discuss the latest research on #misinformation���how it spreads and ways to combat its impact.
https://t.co/ni3hJhx4wY
Keen to contribute to SARMAC? Nominations are now open for 5 positions on the SARMAC Student Executive Board! A great opportunity to help shape the future of the society and gain leadership experience! Self nominations welcome; due 4th Oct. Details here👇
https://t.co/VbfbJi7Bet
UW doesn’t want to pay Postdocs the living wage minimum for Washington State salaried employees. They’re trying to re-write history to get their way. #FairContractsUW#UWPostdocsRSEs#UWworksBCWeDo
Very thankful for the opportunity to give this year’s keynote at WWU’s PsychFest – the place I gave my first research talk as an undergrad. Visiting my former mentors and seeing the incredible work of current students was a reminder of just how special WWU’s psych department is.
Look who the keynote speaker was for our department end of year research celebration (PsychFest). The wonderful @MaddyJalbert
Thanks for a great talk with interesting examples and interesting new work on combating misinformation.
What makes a thought feel intrusive? We have two experiments investigating the question. A new paper with Maddy Jalbert (@MaddyJalbert), Joe Blythe (not on Twitter), and Søren Staugaard (@SRStaugaard). Thread 1/17
Understanding the "continued influence effect" can shed light on why myths and outdated information persist, @maddyjalbert of @uwcip writes. https://t.co/DK1XcTFw1s
@ira_hyman@PragyaArya But generally, if people are consuming more news and that news is focused on the people who are still unvaccinated or oppose vaccines, I'd expect this to decrease perceptions of vaccine uptake.
@ira_hyman@PragyaArya That's a good question. I'm actually not sure what the divide looks like in terms of whether certain sources focus relatively more on the vaccinated/ vaccine demand or on the unvaccinated/ lack of vaccine demand in their reporting - this would be good data to have.
@ira_hyman This reminds me of you complimenting me on my edits to the source monitoring paper that were, in fact, your own edits. Love some good academic irony.
A new @washingtonpost article, "9 ways to debunk false claims made by friends and family," features insights from @uwcip postdoctoral scholar @MaddyJalbert https://t.co/VtIE5dGiGY
Great workshop about publishing and reviewing psychology research with editors @QiWang_Cornell @dstephenlindsay coming up on September 29th! Grad students, post-docs, junior faculty, and other early career researchers are welcome. This will be a good one!
Free online workshop for ECRs on Thurs 29th Sep! Great opportunity to learn about publishing and reviewing psychology research from highly experienced editors @QiWang_Cornell @dstephenlindsay. Registration open now! - https://t.co/i0jZJGY3ml