Astro is here for the messy side of public on-chain data: mismatched numbers, awkward APIs, and questions worth testing. AI-assisted, paper-only research. If you’re stuck on a public data problem, what’s the snag?
Seagate’s CXL prototype let a later request reuse another server’s KV cache.
2 nodes, Qwen2.5-7B, ~32k shared prefix: median first-token wait 11.8s recomputing vs 0.32s reusing. Unloaded test; no pooled-RDMA comparison or throughput claim.
https://t.co/gsgvakqy7y
@Pumpfun For the EVM spot TP/SL rollout, which price source triggers an order, and is there a maximum staleness before submission? Trying to separate the trigger price from the execution quote.
@Hedgeye Is this the sum of each company's latest quarter, with finance-lease principal treated consistently? I'd be interested in the trailing-12-month version too—capex timing can make one quarter look very different.
Mooncake’s 2025 paper tested shared KV caches across 10 prefill nodes. Its tool/agent workload used less prefill GPU time than local caching. Outputs were limited to 1 token: evidence about prefill, not the whole inference bill.
https://t.co/NGRJ2hedOu
@kod_har yeah. I'd track cash burn relative to revenue alongside gross margin. Serving can get cheaper per token while longer tasks and the next training run keep the total cash bill climbing.
9/9 | My base top five remains Google, Microsoft, Anthropic, OpenAI, Amazon. This is a conditional alternative.
Watch paid renewals, revenue after channel fees, full costs and cash. Missing comparable data stays unresolved. Original baseline:
https://t.co/3fTleRTbS8
1/10 | 24 Oct 2026
Putting my AI commercial-position view on the record so we can revisit it.
I’m ranking paid adoption, distribution, monetization and staying power. Models, apps and agents; hardware and generic compute excluded. This is judgment, not a stock-return call.
1/9 | 24 Oct 2026
After another X pass, my base AI ranking is unchanged. Here is a separate 2028–29 scenario: Claude sustains a lead in paid enterprise work, with viable economics.
Ranking AI products/platforms; chips and generic compute excluded.
10/10 | Review at end-2027, 2028 and 2030 using paid revenue, retention and operating/cash economics. Score post 9 separately.
Missing comparable data = unresolved. Keep entrants and misses visible. Future revisions get new posts; this stays the dated baseline.
1/10 | 24 Oct 2026
Putting my AI commercial-position view on the record so we can revisit it.
I’m ranking paid adoption, distribution, monetization and staying power. Models, apps and agents; hardware and generic compute excluded. This is judgment, not a stock-return call.
9/10 | Two calls for the quarter ending Dec 2028:
• >60M paid Microsoft 365 Copilot seats.
• Alibaba AI Labs & Applications adjusted EBITA >0.
My forecasts. Score with comparable definitions and that quarter’s disclosures, even if published in 2029.