LoveEthereal

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." ~MLK Jr.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@benonwine So how does Musk taste down there?

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

They lied, likely paid by the conservative right, who are filming them to spread baseless propaganda about the left whenever elections don’t go their way. If you actually looked into the facts, you’d see that. It’s interesting how the right claims they want to stop this fabricated election fraud.

If that were true, why not report the names of these homeless? Why not submit them to the registrar’s office so it can be investigated? Because it’s a lie. It’s already being debed — if they reported names, it would be easy to verify, but they avoid doing so on purpose, knowing that finding these people again on the street would be nearly impossible.

Fact Check: NO Evidence 'Skid Row' Woman Voted For Karen Bass For $5 -- Registered In Inglewood, Not Los Angeles https://t.co/eNXFWZqIBv via @@YahooNews

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

There’s no evidence this woman voted for Bass. Public records indicate she’s registered in Inglewood, not Los Angeles, which means she couldn’t have voted in the Bass–Caruso race.

Fact Check: NO Evidence 'Skid Row' Woman Voted For Karen Bass For $5 -- Registered In Inglewood, Not Los Angeles Lead Stories https://t.co/cbd82n5bM6 via @LeadStoriesCom

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

Absolutely fabricated. Seems more likely these people were paid by conservatives to lie and claim they were paid to vote, further spreading false disinformation about some made-up scheme of Democrats cheating, intentionally pushed by the right when the election doesn’t go their way.

Fact Check: There is NO evidence this woman voted for Bass at all. Public records show she’s registered in Inglewood, not Los Angeles — meaning she couldn’t vote in the Bass–Caruso race.

Fact Check: NO Evidence 'Skid Row' Woman Voted For Karen Bass For $5 -- Registered In Inglewood, Not Los Angeles https://t.co/eNXFWZqaLX via @@YahooNews

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

There is NO evidence this woman voted for Bass at all. Public records show she’s registered in Inglewood, not Los Angeles — meaning she couldn’t vote in the Bass–Caruso race. This is just another propaganda story manufactured and pushed by conservative propagandists and recycled by right‑wing accounts with zero verification.

Fact Check: NO Evidence 'Skid Row' Woman Voted For Karen Bass For $5 -- Registered In Inglewood, Not Los Angeles Lead Stories https://t.co/cbd82n5bM6 via @leadstoriescom

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

There’s no truth to the claim that Skid Row homeless people were paid to vote for Karen Bass in the Los Angeles mayoral race.

The story about Shanekka Renee Johnson saying she got $5 on Skid Row to vote for Bass is also false. The Los Angeles County Registrar’s office confirmed she isn’t even registered to vote in the city. Official records show she is registered in Inglewood, not Los Angeles, meaning she could not have voted in the Bass–Caruso race at all.

Carolla keeps repeating debunked nonsense ever since he went full MAGA. This “homeless woman paid $5 to vote for Karen Bass” story was false — manufactured and pushed by Spencer Pratt, then recycled by right‑wing accounts with zero verification. As usual...

There is NO evidence this woman voted for Bass at all. Public records show she’s registered in Inglewood, not Los Angeles — meaning she couldn’t vote in the Bass–Caruso race.

Misinformation isn’t an accident. It’s a strategy.
#StopTheLies #TruthMatters #ViralLies #KarenBass #CAElection

☑️Fact Check — Woman Claiming She Was Paid to Vote Bass Is Registered in Inglewood, Not L.A.
https://t.co/eNXFWZqaLX via @@YahooNews

☑️Fact Check: ‘Skid Row’ Woman Who Says She Was Paid $5 To Vote For Karen Bass Is Registered To Vote In Inglewood, Not Los Angeles.
https://t.co/cbd82n5bM6 via @leadstoriescom

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@SonofLiberty357 @elonmusk I doubt you even live in California

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

This claim is false. California didn’t ‘make voter ID illegal.’ The new law only stops cities from creating their own extra ID rules. State law still allows ID checks in the federally‑required cases (first‑time voters who registered without ID), and voters can still show ID voluntarily.

Nothing in California law bans voter ID — it just keeps election rules consistent statewide.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

This is misleading. California didn’t ‘make voter ID illegal.’ The new law only stops cities from creating their own extra ID rules. State law still allows ID checks in the federally‑required cases (first‑time voters who registered without ID), and voters can always show ID voluntarily.

So no — ID isn’t illegal. California just kept election rules consistent statewide, instead of thier inconsistantly being different rules from city to city.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

Awww I wonder what megalomaniacs dream about..... 😴💤
#TrumpSleeping

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

Yeah, and just like that, with no helmet on. He won't be standing for long (ie NO OXYGEN IN SPACE!)....and let's be real, with his cankles, he can barely stand as it is.

Conservatives with their strongman / tough guy fantasy.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

I'm not sure what any of this has to do with communism!? That word gets thrown around so often at anything remotely liberal, progressive, or culturally different that it's practically lost all meaning. Disagreeing with something doesn't make it communism.

As for "woke," it's remarkable how the term has evolved from awareness of injustice into a slur for empathy, inclusion, diversity, anti-discrimination, and concern for marginalized people.

Jesus preached compassion, challenged hypocrisy, defended outcasts, welcoming the foreigner, inclusion rather than exclusion, and criticized the powerful for neglecting the vulnerable. Today, many would probably call that "woke."

Isaiah 5:20 warns: "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil." Looking at how "woke" is used today, that verse feels surprisingly relevant.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@BOJANGLES6253 @krassenstein Every claim you made is wrong. And to top it off, personal insults are a sure sign of someone who can’t argue facts.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@krassenstein

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@AmericaPartyX Riiiiight....

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

If God really sent legions of angels for Donald Trump, he shouldn’t feel “protected” — he should run. In the Bible, angels don’t show up to babysit evil. They show up to end it.

People keep saying “God sent His angels to protect him,” like angels are heavenly bodyguards for anyone who claims divine favor. But Scripture says the opposite.
When God sends angels, it’s overwhelmingly to STOP evil, not shield it.

Receipts:
📖 Genesis 19 — Angels destroy Sodom & Gomorrah because the city was violent, abusive, oppressive, and hostile to the vulnerable — (not because of “gay sex.)” Their sin was injustice, cruelty, and the attempted assault of strangers/visitors.
📖 Exodus 12 — The Destroyer strikes Egypt’s firstborn 📖 2 Kings 19 — One angel wipes out 185,000 soldiers 📖 1 Chronicles 21 — An angel brings a plague
📖 Acts 12 — An angel strikes down Herod
📖 Revelation — Angels unleash judgment and bind Satan

Biblically, angels are:
⚔️ warriors
⚔️ agents of judgment
⚔️ enforcers of divine justice
⚔️ destroyers of corruption

They are not political props. They are not PR teams. They are not sent to protect someone who deceives, manipulates, persecutes, sows chaos, or demands worship like a golden calf.
So when people claim “God sent His angels to protect this man,” while he’s doing the very things Scripture condemns, they’re not quoting the Bible — they’re contradicting it while worshipping the man who loves gold, and himself above all. Why would God send angels to protect a man who is full of evil actions.

The biblical reality:
✝️ God sends angels to confront evil, not defend it.
✝️ God sends angels to tear down corruption, not prop it up.
✝️ God sends angels to stop injustice, not bless it.

If someone wants to claim angelic protection, their life should reflect the righteousness God actually honors — not the kind He repeatedly sends angels to judge.

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@stevinr20 @BasedMikeLee @BuiltbySara That joke is hilarious!!

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@JillSaidIt @LePapillonBlu2 @gonewiththedogs

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@LePapillonBlu2 Thank you!

[LoveEthereal @madriorama]

@MarsUniversityX Musk is identifying a very real problem—institutional bloat and the inefficiency of "jobs for the sake of jobs." But his proposed solution dismisses the invisible, structural work required to keep large-scale systems from collapsing under their own weight.