Mad

TIKTOK:

[Mad @madscaler1]

@IllusoryAnime Where do you have Naruto’s speed at?

[Mad @madscaler1]

@bruhj22 @Middffy Yh that’s an interpretation but another is he’s saying the truth and it’s backed up by other states made by characters about the same situation.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@HatePilll @Yonin7x Icl ur being non sequitur. You’re still assuming the conclusion. Erasing something without firsthand experience doesn’t prove Gremmy can create something with properties he doesn’t know. Those are two different claims.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@Yonin7x @HatePilll Disagree heavily. Nothing establishes Gremmy’s power as “conceptual content → reality.” Imagining non-existence doesn’t prove it either.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy @SenninEnergy was ur argument that Naruto tanked the explosion from the blast or the chakra drain attack? I you to clarify so he doesn’t keep attacking an irrelevant point.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy So ur essentially questioning something someone did not say.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy Once again ur not comprehending anything here really. The debate stemming from the comparison of Ichigo Kenpachi gives context as what is meant by tanking and durability. Ur question is irrelevant to the argument meant by Sennin.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy Evidence :

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy So the chakra drain thing is irrelevant to durability which essentially is what u guys are arguing especially when comparing to the Ichigo kenpachi thing.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy It’s not. It’s basically what he was essentially arguing - the blast did not damage but ur tryna get a getcho ya out as him with the chakras drain thing when it’s irrelevant.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy Are you intentionally ignoring when he this??!

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy But your question is irrelevant to his argument. You’re ignoring his actual point and introducing a separate argument that doesn’t refute it. That’s a red herring, you’re diverting the discussion instead of addressing what he actually argued.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy He literally specifies the blast here, that’s the entire argument. The chakra drain is irrelevant when discussing damage from the blast. Naruto was KO’d from losing chakra, not physical damage. Refusing to admit the blast did no physical damage is just disingenuous.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy He did say or at the very least meant that. Do you agree he took no damage physical damage to his body from the blast ?

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy Sennin’s argument is that Naruto didn’t take any physical damage from the blast. He was KO’d because his chakra literally his life force was drained from him. So yes, Naruto was knocked out as a result of losing his life force, but the blast did no physical damage to his body.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy Your straw manning him.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@0relevance @SenninEnergy Ur being very fallacious and disingenuous here.

[Mad @madscaler1]

@bruhj22 @Middffy Yes but assuming he was lying no evidence for that