@AddisonOklahoma@GeneralMCNews Louder, for the idiots in the back. God help us all, if she continues on her current trajectory (being SHOVED down our throats) to a ballot. (After Charlie’s murder and the LACK of an aftermath, nothing would shock me. Not one https://t.co/WEgV4JvWVG CK 😞)
Ummmm, I wouldn’t show up to see her if she had my Publisher’s Clearinghouse check. Okay? WHY does the VP WANT to host an event with HER beside him?!! Never, EVER, will ‘I’ support a ticket with HER name on it! Between her & a Dem, I abstain. 🤮🙄🤬
Pleased to announce we are the #1 Podcast globally again!
(tied w/ Joe Rogan but he doesn’t count, he’s always crushing it).
Thank you to everyone worldwide who listens and fights with us. My team of 5 works really hard and we are beyond grateful.🙏
When Candace Owens first began questioning the mainstream narrative about the Charlie Kirk assassination I, admittedly, thought she was distracting from the truth about what happened him.
I listened to JD Vance and Stephen Miller on the Charlie Kirk show the week after talk about how these radical leftwing NGO groups are inciting and planning violence on conservatives. Could a radical leftwing group, like Armed Queers SLC have radicalized Tyler Robinson and coordinated and planned the attack? There was a decoy in the crowd, Tyler Robinson seems to have been coordinating with cars after the shot was taken, there was chatter online before the assassination, etc. I am still not completely closed off to the possibility that a leftwing group was responsible. I emphasize group. The "lone wolf" narrative seems very unlikely.
However, another group that had the motive and means to take out Charlie Kirk was the military industrial complex within the Zionist government of Israel, and this is where I was wrong about Candace Owens...
Candace questioned immediately the behavior of Bibi Netanyahu within 48 hours of Charlie being killed. Bibi went on Fox News within 24 hours to issue condolences and say that Charlie was a never wavering friend of Israel. Within 48 hours, Bibi was denying that Israel was involved in the assassination.
Candace then revealed the pressure, threats, and moral blackmail Charlie was receiving from his Zionist donors and friends over his shifting views on Israel, and his refusal to remove Tucker Carlson, who they considered "the most dangerous antisemite in America" from TPUSA events. Candace then revealed what happened at the Hamptons Meeting wherein Charlie was bullied over his shifting views and Tucker Carlson. Finally, Candace Owens revealed the text messages of Charlie saying that "because of the stereotypical behavior of Jewish donors... he had no choice but to leave the Pro-Israel cause."
What is interesting about this bombshell text message thread was that these same Zionist donors and friends accused Candace of making them up. Only to have Andrew Kolvet confirm they were from his own phone, and he submitted them to the authorities after Charlie was killed because he believed them to be relevant evidence!
Andrew Kolvet, along with a few others, received messages from Charlie saying that he was afraid for his life. Andrew clearly was concerned that Charlie's shifting views might've played a role in his death. Truth seekers of good faith are allowed to be concerned about the same.
Why were Charlie Kirks shifting views and support of Israel such a big deal? Charlie had proven himself to be a powerful political force. He and TPUSA had just run the ground game and flipped the 2024 election in President Trump's favor. Charlie had his pulse on the finger of young people in America more so than any other person. He had the ear of President Trump, and prevented the US from engaging in a regime change war with Iran the summer before he was killed. He was perhaps the most influential figure for the people in America. He was the lynchpin of the Right. Imagine, if he was no longer going to use his influence and platform to advocate for US aid and support of Israel?
Bibi Netanyahu and Israel have said that they have an existential requirement to win the information war in America. Israel is recruiting Christian pastors and churches across America to fight "misinformation about Israel" amongst young people in America. Who has the largest network of Evangelical Christian churches in America? TPUSA. Bibi Netanyahu has said that social media is a weapon of modern warfare. Bibi wanted and needed Charlie to advocate for Israel, and Charlie refused. In fact, he was advising President Trump to defy Bibi Netanyahu's wishes. What would a country be willing to do for survival? Governments do terrible things... We must be asking these questions.
Finally, we would have never even know about any of these things if not for Candace Owens. She put herself out there to reveal it all, and they have lied about her every step of the way. It started with Eric Bolling on the Patrick Bet David podcast saying that Candace hadn't been invited to TPUSA events for years and that Charlie had a silent break up with her. Both of these were verified to be false, even though a guy like Dave Rubin reposted Eric Bolling vouching for it.
Once I saw the lies and unfair attacks on Candace Owens for revealing true things about what was happening to Charlie my perspective started to change. What we witnessed was the same Zionist lobby who were attacking Charlie Kirk in the last months of his life, lying and slandering Candace Owens for speaking up about it. Then Megyn Kelly did too, and look at what they are doing to her. It is truly insane and eye opening.
All of that to be said, I am open minded about which group was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I just want to know the truth, and I know many people do. We have no problem questioning our own American government, why can't we do the same of a foreign nation?
After all that we've been through we are just supposed to trust governments now? We know that governments and the elite will do evil things to get their way. This is the way of the world. It is naive to think otherwise, and imprudent to not question what we are being told. If we don't have the truth, we have nothing.
PhDs are no longer impressive… Give me the 1st 100 rednecks in MAGA hats before the 1st 100 PhDs from Harvard, everyday of the week and twice on Sunday.
Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026
America 1st, Just Right™️
Lots of misinformation out on the interwebs, but this is NOT. I remember it happening and being madder than a wet hen! Don’t that just beat all?!? There ain’t words colorful enough. 🤬🤬🤬
🚨EXCLUSIVE: Charlie’s Parents Move to BLOCK Erika’s Personal TRADEMARK Power Grab —"Verbal Will" Also Under Fire As Parents CHALLENGE Erika's CEO Takeover at TPUSA! ⚡😱
The media is trying to sell you a story of a "united family," but the legal receipts tell a different story. While Erika Kirk was rapidly installed as CEO of Turning Point USA—claiming it was Charlie's "dying wish"—a massive legal rift has opened between her and Charlie’s parents, Robert and Marjorie Kirk.
Here is the intelligence update on the battle for the Kirk legacy:
1. The Trademark "Smoking Gun" (Serial No. 99427868)
On October 4, 2025, just weeks after the assassination, Erika Kirk didn't file for Charlie’s name on behalf of the charity. She filed for "CHARLIE KIRK" as a personal trademark for herself.
The Goal: Total personal ownership of Charlie’s name, voice, and likeness for everything from clothing to financial services.
The Conflict: Charlie’s parents are reportedly moving to block this. Under USPTO rules, you cannot trademark a deceased public figure's name if it creates a "false suggestion of connection" to their actual estate or surviving family without consent. His parents are refusing to give that consent.
2. The Probate Battle: Did Charlie Actually Leave Her Nothing?
While a viral satire video claimed Charlie left Erika $0 due to an affair, the actual legal friction is even deeper.
The "Verbal Will" Dispute: TPUSA claims Charlie gave verbal instructions for Erika to take over. Charlie’s parents are reportedly challenging this in Maricopa County, demanding a full audit of the Kirk Family Trust. This case is currently sealed but my source close to the investigation tells me there is very much a probate dispute behind the scenes in the courts.
The Assets: They are fighting to ensure Charlie’s millions in intellectual property stay with his bloodline (his two children) and aren't consolidated into Erika’s personal business entities.
3. We have identified a pre-opposition lock on this application. Charlie’s parents, Robert and Marjorie Kirk, have reportedly retained counsel to file a Section 2(c) objection. This prohibits the registration of a name identifying a recently deceased public figure without written consent from the heirs.
As Charlie’s immediate bloodline heirs currently challenging the "verbal will" in Arizona probate, the parents are withholding consent. They are effectively blocking Erika from owning the "Charlie Kirk" brand as a personal asset.
The Specific Trademark Targets (Serial No. 99427868): Erika’s filing seeks personal ownership over Charlie’s name for:Educational & Entertainment Services (Lectures, podcasts, video production)Clothing & Merchandise (The entire "Kirk" brand aesthetic)Insurance & Financial Services (Control over the estate’s monetary legacy)
2. The TPUSA "Succession" Dispute & The Audit. New intelligence from February 2026 reveals that the "unanimous" board vote that installed Erika as CEO is now under legal fire.
The parents are using reports of "financial impropriety"—specifically the $350,000 shell company transfer for the life insurance policy—to demand a third-party audit of the Kirk Family Trust.
This is a tactical move to freeze Erika’s ability to move IP or funds into her personal accounts.
Summary of Legal Friction
▫️ Trademark 99427868 -Erika Kirk (Individual) BLOCKED by Section 2(c) parental non-consent.
▫️TPUSA Leadership Board "Succession"Parents challenging "Verbal Instruction" validity.
▫️The Will Probate Challenge-Maricopa County filing for FULL ESTATE
Tag @RealCandaceO and RT everywhere. The truth is coming out, and the "Bride of Charlie" investigation is just the beginning.
Candace is slowly assembling the case the FBI should have put together after Charlie was killed. Along the way, she’s been mocked, attacked, sued and relentlessly smeared. But that’s always how it goes: ''First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win!''
People across the country and far beyond it, are sending in clues, they are all in this, connecting dots and sharing information. This story isn’t fading into obscurity. This will not be another Kennedy case, mark my words, Charlie Kirk’s case will be solved, one way or another.
And to those responsible, run while you can bitches. If the FBI won’t deliver justice, the American people will, and they won’t stop until the truth is dragged into the light!
I BELIEVE YOU Candace. EVERY word you’ve said, you’ve backed up with PROOF! YOU have proven. It is a TRUE SHAME when POLITICS are more important than a young man’s life.When politics are more important than CHILDREN.
This is a MUST READ about Erika Kirk.
Every single word of this is accurate and there is not enough money in the world that can force us to deny our human instincts.
@RealCandaceO EK ain’t sued CO because for WHAT?!? Outing her and every other person who DID WHAT WE ALL KNOW THEY DID. As much as CO has revealed (WITH receipts) don’t all of y’all naysayers think EK would have CO knee-deep in court filings??? Thank God for CO. SOMEONE who genuinely loved CK.