FORMER FINANCE PROFESSOR TAD SMITH: "After 25 years teaching finance, I realized at 58:
If the money printer grows 8-10% annually and the S&P 500 returns ~9%, it’s just treading water. True wealth comes from outpacing the printer.
That’s the #Bitcoin journey." 👏
🚨NEW: One full minute of Elizabeth Warren trying to find ways to squirm out of the lies she told about Joe Biden being mentally fit to run for re-election.
She fails. Miserably.
From @grok: Wickard v. Filburn was a landmark United States Supreme Court case decided in 1942 that significantly expanded the federal government's power to regulate economic activity under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The case involved Roscoe Filburn, an Ohio farmer who grew wheat on his land. Under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, the federal government set quotas on wheat production to stabilize prices during the Great Depression. Filburn exceeded his allotted quota, growing extra wheat for personal use on his farm, such as feeding his livestock. The government fined him for overproduction, arguing that even though the excess wheat wasn’t sold in interstate commerce, it still affected the national wheat market by reducing the amount Filburn would otherwise have purchased.
Filburn challenged the fine, claiming that his wheat production for personal use didn’t involve interstate commerce and thus fell outside Congress’s regulatory authority. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Robert H. Jackson, disagreed. The Court ruled that even small, local activities—like growing wheat for personal use—could have a substantial cumulative effect on interstate commerce when aggregated across many farmers. This interpretation broadened the scope of the Commerce Clause, allowing Congress to regulate not just direct interstate transactions but also activities that indirectly influenced the national economy.
The decision (317 U.S. 111) marked a turning point in constitutional law, solidifying federal authority over a wide range of economic activities. It’s often cited as a key precedent for expansive federal regulation, influencing cases on everything from civil rights to healthcare. Critics argue it stretched the Commerce Clause beyond its original intent, while supporters see it as a practical adaptation to a modern, interconnected economy.
🇷🇴🇩🇪 German MEP (AfD), asks the million dollar question:
If the Romanian people chose Georgescu, why did the EU cancel our elections and ban Georgescu from running?
We all know why but we still need to confront them with their crimes
🚨 #BREAKING: Maui Police Chief John Pelletier, who gave the order to TRAP VICTIMS IN THE LAHAINA FIRE, has now been named as a co-conspirator in the Diddy case
Pelletier ALSO happened to be the Incident Commander during the Las Vegas shootıng.
Pelletier FORCIBLY took a Diddy victim at gunpoint from Vegas to California to be r*ped by Diddy by posing as a sheriff executing a fake warrant, according to the suit.
Even after these incidents occurred, Pelletier was STILL named Chief of Maui Police, and the devastating fires happened shortly after.
Many questions have loomed as to whether or not children went missing after the fires, where entire families disappeared without a trace.
The government disputes this claims, and they have not been verified.
This story goes MUCH deeper than what we already know.
It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history.
Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals.
Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study!
Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway.
It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data onBextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal.
As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted.
After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.
He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years.
No worries, they don't fake research studies when it's concerning vaccines. 😳
BREAKING: US REP BYRON DONALDS TO INTRODUCE BILL TO MAKE THE STRATEGIC #BITCOIN RESERVE PERMANENT TODAY
THE LAW MANDATES THAT "NO FUTURE PRESIDENT" CAN SELL AMERICA'S BTC
HERE WE GO 🚀 🚀 🚀