MakingSense

Logos Rising.

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

1.Was there a pandemic involving a lethal pathogen that spread globally? Prove it!

2.What is the false positive rate of PCR on a scale from 25 to 45? What cycle threshold did US testing facilities use?

3.Explain the mechanism of action by which an injectable product could cause immunity against a respiratory infection?

4. Why were the official Pfizer post marketing release data showing 1,223 deaths in first 90 days ignored?

5. How can a regulator safely recommend a new product be injected in children (or anyone) but not know what is in the vials?

6. Remdesivir failed its clinical trials killing 53% of recipients in the treatment arm. How did you make this drug the ‘standard of care’ for Covid? Of those hospital deaths attributed to Covid, how many died due to kidney/liver failure?

7. How is it that the furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 matches a sequence Moderna patented years before?

8. Researchers have demonstrated that the COVID-19 vaccines were a military program disguised as a civilian one. The COVID-19 vaccines were obtained by the DOD under an OTA and are not legally pharmaceuticals but military prototype medical countermeasures, which are not regulated by the FDA and can contain literally anything. Is this true?

9. What qualifies you to make the claim that natural immunity, a capacity built up in humans over hundreds of thousands of years and a cornerstone of established medical orthodoxy, was *inferior* to being injected with an experimental technology that had failed animal trials?

10. Explain why you never quote from peer reviewed studies that don’t fit your narrative of which there are thousands.
For example the Cleveland Clinic study which featured 70,000+ subjects and which clearly shows the more injections people receive, the higher their susceptibility to illness?

[Barbara78 @dragonduclos]

L’ancien chancelier allemand Gerhard Schröder révèle dans une interview magistrale et retentissante comment des opportunités historiques pour mettre fin à la guerre entre la Russie et l’Ukraine ont été délibérément sabotées.

Il parle "d'un système pour prolonger la guerre. Il ne s’agit pas de liberté ou de démocratie. Tout tourne autour du pouvoir géopolitique, de l’affaiblissement de la Russie à tout prix et de milliards de profits militaires. Quiconque parle de cessez-le-feu est qualifié d’apologiste de Poutine".

"Ce n’est plus une démocratie, c’est une dictature de l’opinion publique."

Les preuves rassemblées par Schröder et le journalisme d’investigation sont accablantes.

A lire ⬇️

[Pat Morrissey 1215 @dr_morrissey]

Roy Butler’s death to be raised at Irish Medical Council inquiry this week https://t.co/wRrA9PZ5cb

[dejanira @dejanirasilveir]

🚨EL DESASTRE de la Identificación Digital de la India es una ADVERTENCIA para el mundo ⚠️

🔴HACKEARON el sistema digital de la India. Más de mil millones de personas se vieron obligadas a participar en un sistema biométrico que vinculaba la alimentación, las pensiones y la atención médica a una única identificación digital. ¿El resultado? Una CRISIS HUMANITARIA

⚠️Los delincuentes piratearon y clonaron identidades, dejando a familias pasando hambre, a ancianos sin pensiones y a enfermos rechazados en los hospitales.

⚠️ESTAS SON LAS CONSECUENCIAS DE UNA SOCIEDAD DIGITALIZADA:
Con sólo presionar un botón, simplemente cancelan su cuenta. Ya no puedes comprar comida. Ya no puedes hacer nada ⚠️

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

Would Aer Lingus have installed Starlink if still state-owned? I think we know the answer to that…

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

A cunning move by Aer Lingus 😉

[Eugene Garvin @critical_class]

Can I suggest some additions:
- the capture of academia as part of SDG4.
- the depopulation agenda, which spans a number of the SDGs.
- the wealth transfer from West to East (multiple SDGs) and under SDG8 - growth in the East/South, de-industrialisation and de-growth in the West.
- drive increased borrowing/national debt as part of pursuing net zero and related initiatives.

Apart from that, it looks really good.
I think @sandiadams2030 would approve.

[J.K. Lunden @Jklunden]

🚨 WHO’S REALLY DECIDING WHAT GOES INTO OUR CHILDREN’S CLASSROOMS?

Irish primary school teacher traces the links from EU, UN and WHO strategies to what’s appearing in your child's school and libraries.
🔗 in comments

Parents need to see this.
WATCH & SHARE. 👀
#VileBooks
#IrishEducation #ParentalRightsAn

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

At the heart of the rot is the 2030 Agenda/SDGs, a framework that promised a better world but which has demonstrably failed despite having been adopted across the entirety of the policy making apparatus of state. If the Irish Government was a stick of rock and you cut a piece off, you’d see the multi-coloured motif of the SDGs going right through it. At 80%, we are in the top 15% globally for SDG compliance, which might get the champagne corks popping in Iveagh house but offers cold comfort to the hundreds of thousands of Irish people struggling to afford life’s essentials.

The promise of the Sustainable Development Goals was utopian: end poverty, reduce inequality, deliver affordable housing, improve health and education, protect the environment and build peaceful, ‘inclusive’ societies. But nature teaches us that the brightest colours do not always promise the sweetest rewards: as with certain types of plants and animals, they can instead signal the deadliest poisons.

11 years after Ireland set out to become a model ‘SDG state’, the Ireland of 2026 stands as a sobering testament to the gulf between utopian promises and lived reality, between bureaucratic targets and tangible progress and between the ambitions of those who govern and the everyday struggles of those they govern.

Nor can economic adversity be offered as an excuse. Quite the contrary. Despite unprecedented national wealth, soaring public expenditure and the deep integration of the SDGs into national policymaking, Ireland finds itself afflicted by a toxic combination of democratic dehydration and technocratic poisoning.

Take a few of the goals:

SDG 1 - No Poverty: Despite being one of the world’s wealthiest countries, poverty and material deprivation persist in Ireland. According to the CSO, 687,784 (12.6%) people are at risk of poverty, whereas Children at risk of poverty now number 211,150 (16.9%). People experiencing enforced deprivation is at 824,249 (15.1%) with 36.9% of households, nearly 1/2.5 unable to save monthly. In a typical classroom of 22 pupils, 9 are from such households. Yet we are amongst the wealthiest of countries? At 80% SDG adoption and in the light of our uniquely strong headline economic performance, poverty should be eradicated by now. But instead, it’s growing. The most choking statistic is child consistent poverty, which increased from 4.8% in 2023 to 7.8% in 2025 - a massive increase of 62.5%.

SDG 2 - Zero Hunger: Food poverty is also a deteriorating reality, with families in 2026 relying on charitable food assistance. The persistence of vulnerabilities in food sovereignty are difficult to explain: an incredible 70% of Irish flour is imported from the UK, despite our food-production heritage. Current controversy over plans to add folic acid to UK flour has jolted Irish public health administrators into adopting similar measures rather than invite trouble in respect of disrupted food supply chains. Why don’t we have control over the food we eat, 10 years after the SDGs were adopted?

And on and on..,

There are 17 Goals, so no space to go through them all here, but I will include one more, namely SDG 4 - Quality Education.

Ireland faces persistent teacher shortages, pressure on school places and declining performance in reading and mathematics. Yet while these fundamental problems remain unresolved, successive governments have sought to embed the UN’s Agenda 2030 into education policy and curriculum reform. Under SDG Target 4.7, schools are increasingly expected not merely to educate children, but to promote sustainable development, global citizenship and prescribed social and environmental objectives. To become activists in other words.

Ireland’s ‘ESD to 2030’ strategy explicitly seeks to mobilise young people and equip educators to advance societal transformation. Why are an otherwise world class education system’s priorities being redirected away from academic excellence towards spurious global values?

[Bernd Kaiser @Bernd_Kaiser_BD]

Deutschland rettet das Weltklima, Donald Trump rettet die deutsche Autoindustrie – allerdings in den USA! Während man uns hierzulande das Märchen vom grünen Wirtschaftswunder erzählt, feiert Audi-Chef Gernot Döllner lieber mit dem US-Präsidenten in Georgia ein neues 4-Milliarden-Dollar-Werk.
Satte 4.500 neue Arbeitsplätze und 200.000 dicke SUVs pro Jahr – „Made in America“ statt in Baden-Württemberg.

Und in der Heimat?
Da zieht Audi zeitgleich für die deutschen Standorte die sogenannte „Schlechtwetterklausel“.
Bis zu 7.500 Arbeitsplätze sollen gestrichen werden, während 15.000 Mitarbeiter im Werk Neckarsulm um ihre Existenz zittern.
Der Konzern schreibt zwar ungeachtet der Krise 1,1 Milliarden Euro operativen Gewinn, flüchtet aber vor den absurden deutschen Rahmenbedingungen:
Lohnstückkosten, die 15 Prozent über dem Euro-Schnitt liegen, erdrückende Steuern und exorbitante Strompreise, die jede industrielle Produktion im Keim ersticken.

Audi ist dabei nicht allein.
BMW baut 8.000 Stellen ab und investiert 1,7 Milliarden in den USA, Mercedes pumpt vier Milliarden in sein US-Werk in Alabama, während hierzulande der Rotstift regiert.
Die Deindustrialisierung ist keine Verschwörungstheorie, sie ist handfeste Regierungspolitik.
Wir vertreiben unsere Kernindustrie mit Bürokratie und ideologischer Energiepolitik ins Ausland und wundern uns dann, dass der Wohlstand schwindet.

Glückwunsch an die politischen Geisterfahrer in Berlin:
Das Projekt „Wirtschaftsstandort Deutschland abwickeln“ läuft absolut nach Plan.
Der Letzte macht bitte das Windrad aus!

#Audi #Deindustrialisierung #Energiewende

https://t.co/9ghlXgJJnm

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

@EricLDaugh EU is dying.

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Western economies around the world are uniformly stagnating, and most heavy industries have been forced offshore.

This is because once-universal baseload power has been systematically degraded and decommissioned. It was once abundant, dense, cheap and reliable, and yet no viable substitute has been found.

The pursuit of intermittent, diluted sunlight and wind has become the costliest failure in human history, projected to cost $275 trillion to meet Net Zero. This was a public relations target dreamed up to forge a new pan-globalist society upon the ashes of our once-predictable lives.

The supply chain for this transformation has been handed wholesale to Beijing. China now controls roughly 90% of all photovoltaic components, refined critical minerals, and solar hardware. It is an unprecedented transfer of Western wealth that has cemented China's position as the greatest manufacturing power in history.

There is a great flaw, though. In place of high-density generation sits an intermittent wind and sunlight apparatus, which is fundamentally incompatible with a modern power grid. Traditional coal, oil and gas still provide 81% of global primary energy after almost 40 years; while wind and solar sit at just 6%.

More than a million wind turbines and an estimated 9 billion solar panels now degrade open farmlands, ridgelines and coastal vistas. Integrating these unreliable sources presents a colossal, additional $21 trillion global infrastructure burden to re-engineer the power grid.

Manufacturing jobs are being hollowed out across the West, striking at the very heart of high-density, energy-intensive sectors like electric arc steel, aluminium smelting and fertiliser production.

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

@peterjdunne1 @Nick_Delehanty https://t.co/JEVLw1bKRB

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

@peterjdunne1 @Nick_Delehanty Activists and ‘Global Citizens’.

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

@NaturalWomensIE have been running street demos and campaigns on the capture of Irish Education for a number of years.

Their YouTube channel is a goldmine of research based analysis.

Parents are busy these days, but kids only get one childhood. Irish parents should Get educated and active in opposing the dismantling of a world leading education system, happening in broad daylight.

https://t.co/AA5TWmzCDT

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech

The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world

They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys

In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom

Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was established 38 years ago, ostensibly as a neutral agency to gather objective scientific information on climate.

Instead, it became the focused, driving force behind the greatest environmental and social upheaval in modern history. From day one, the IPCC was a highly politicised body. Founded entirely by United Nations agencies - the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the UN Environment Programme - it gave the UN complete administrative control over the climate agenda.

The sheer complexity of the machinery combined with the aura of technical secrecy is precisely what insulates it from scrutiny.

The WMO bridges the gap between raw meteorological data, international political agendas and the media. By linking thousands of land stations, ocean buoys, aircraft and satellites, its role is to share critical weather and water data. However, this infrastructure was co-opted into a public relations framework.

Consequently, the world has been bombarded with overhyped weather hysteria for almost 40 years. Mainstream news outlets routinely prioritise speculative, worst-case climate models over empirical observations, maintaining a permanent state of crisis designed to shape public compliance.

Climate management bears no relation to the UN’s foundational charter of resolving international conflict; this is a textbook case of bureaucratic mission creep. Nor are UN agencies passive coordinators. Through the WMO, they ensured a crisis framework became the baseline for all weather reporting.

Local weather outlets and national agencies now operate inside an ecosystem heavily influenced by overarching, high-alarm targets, broadcasting continuous warnings of global boiling, sea level rises, and a 'Code Red for Mankind' - with UN leadership acting as the chief amplifier.

The IPCC did not recruit independent scientific staff; instead, its administrative apparatus became active in sponsoring and selecting studies that supported the carbon dioxide hypothesis. Research raising questions or doubts was minimised or discarded. Critics found their work starved of publishers, and in some cases, university tenures were threatened.

This environment birthed foundational, highly charged studies designed to lock in future warming projections. Among the earliest was the 1999 'hockey stick' graph by Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes, which erased historical temperature variations to present a sharp, unprecedented upward spike in the twentieth century.

For decades, the institution promoted worst-case scenarios. A prime example is the IPCC's 2011 report warning of a 5.5-degree temperature rise - a prediction so extreme that mainstream scientists have finally conceded it was implausible and quietly withdrawn it. Yet the pattern of reliance on flawed models over real-world observation had already been set.

Armed with this manufactured crisis, the UN called for the rapid dismantling of hydrocarbon fuels - coal, oil and natural gas - which had lifted humanity out of stagnation and powered the Industrial Revolution. Almost every aspect of modern civilisation, from transport networks to manufacturing plants, relies entirely on these dense, inexpensive, and reliable energy sources.

The proposed replacements - intermittent wind and solar - have proven fundamentally incapable of providing raw baseload power. Yet the push to phase out hydrocarbons has marched forward regardless, driving the planned decline of heavy industrial production, severe economic downturns, and widespread job losses across Western nations.

By establishing the IPCC, the UN created a centralised machinery that successfully synthesised climate science into a global political weapon - sacrificing empirical reality on the altar of bureaucratic expansion.

[JoeLange @JoeLange]

Trump’s deal with Putin for diesel, is bigger than most people think.

It cut the legs out from under the EU and Zelensky to keep the war going.
The war is being FORCED to an end because the EU cannot afford to pay for a war, with no help from the U.S.

When Trump made a deal with Putin for diesel, he exposed the EU’s hypocrisy because they have purchased natural gas from Russia throughout the war.

Funding both sides.

Trump cut off aid to Ukraine and is now funding Russia.
He welcomes the “criticism” from the media and the neocon military industrial complex.

Why?

Because he holds the “evidence,” proving that Zelensky and his cronies have stolen half the taxpayers money given to them.

That exposure is coming and it will FORCE an end to the war.

But that’s only part of what Trump is doing.

This Russian “deal” is strategic for the future.

Think much bigger.

Trump is setting up the world, for the greatest economic expansion ever.
It’s going to be far greater than anybody can imagine and it will also happen very quickly.

If massive economic expansion is the goal, what does the world need?

A massive “expansion” in “cheap” energy, minerals and resources.

Trump’s team working behind the scenes, have been making trade deals involving very important “resources.”

Now here comes a story, where the curtain is being peeled back, to reveal a much bigger deal coming with Russia.

“Putin's top aide Yury Ushakov confirmed after Steve Witkoff's latest meeting with Putin that "Other large-scale joint economic projects, which offer significant prospects for bilateral cooperation, were also discussed in detail; some of them are now nearing the implementation stage." This followed Putin courting the return of US investment to Russia's resource sector in early 2025 and Kirill Dmitriev recently confirming talks on nuclear-powered data centers.”

Don’t miss these two important data points:

“some of them (deals) are now nearing the “implementation” stage”

“Putin courting the return of US “investment” to Russia's resource sector in early 2025”

They have been working on these resource “deals” since early in Trump’s second term and they are now nearing “implementation.”
Not “sales” to the U.S.
Shared “investments.”

Do you understand how important these trade deals with Russia are?

Trump is destroying the cabal’s generational narrative, that Russia is our enemy.
At the same time, he is destroying the neocon military industrial complex theft of taxpayers money and fear of war.

A U.S. and Russian alliance, centered around massive trade deals and cooperation, ends the propaganda fear narrative needed to promote constant war.

Putin is not our enemy and never was.
He was fighting against the same cabal puppets that Trump is now busy taking down.

Putin isn’t just offering to “sell” resources to America.
It’s a much bigger deal and it will be a huge “safeguard” to prevent conflict in the future.

What kind of deals are Trump and Putin making?

“US stakes in Russia's energy infrastructure and companies”

“Russia's globally significant critical mineral deposits remain woefully underexploited, but with US stakes in this industry through the above mentioned sequence and separate capital injections, it can be brought online relatively quickly for accelerating the US' diversification from dependence on China.”

“Per Dmitriev's recent disclosure, talks on nuclear-powered data centers represent another promising opportunity for both countries.”

“Critical mineral processing facilities and data centers can also be powered by hydroelectric dams, not just nuclear power plants, and the US can obtain stakes in all four - the facilities, centers, dams, and plants.”

“The mineral deposits in which the US recently invested in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan can reach jointly owned processing facilities in Russia through the Trans-Siberian Railwayand then onward to the global market.”

https://t.co/Lj6tJvrVlm

Two global powerhouses uniting in peace and prosperity.

[Barbara - Shining a Light @BarbarasBack]

"COVID-19 injections meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction..."
NOT all the C19 injections were the same...
Time for ALL the 'vaccinated' to check their vax number here: https://t.co/BtlvCBYKlX
May God have Mercy on you all 🙏

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

@FineGaelBrux “We do!”

[Promethean Action @PrometheanActn]

Chatham House warns Trump could come out of the midterms "unshackled from electoral constraints."

Rubio: "We're no longer going to be defensive."

@SJKokinda on why the midterms can't stop him 👇

[MakingSense @MakingSenseInfo]

Books published by Irish Journalists after major crises.

Banking collapse: 19
Covid: 2