Ash Dozer

[Leader John Thune @LeaderJohnThune]

To quote the New York Times, “Many Americans Say the Democratic Party Does Not Share Their Priorities.”

Men in women’s sports. Abortion up until the moment of birth. Open borders. Defunding law enforcement.

Democrats are getting more extreme.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

@Rep_Walkinshaw The voting system has weaknesses. Should we just sit tight and wait for the weaknesses to be taken advantage of, or should we fix them now and avoid the fraud that can, will, and has happened?

My vote is for fixing the weaknesses and strengthening voting integrity.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

@ColinWr29337470 @SenFettermanPA Because it’s that simple?

Most the world realizes it’s much more complicated than a single finger point.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

When the rent is too damn high it’s easy to hate the landlord making money off you. But when you’re a renter…you never have to make a repair, you never have to sock away $100K in cash for a down payment, and if your place burns down, you can just walk away.

Before you bitch about landlords, ask yourself: could you save up $100K right now to make a down payment? What about $10K repair when a pipe bursts? Or your government leaves 50 years of brush to BURN YOUR CITY DOWN? These are all things a property owner has to deal with. Risk, liability, maintenance, taxes, loss of liquidity, ever-increasing insurance costs, and no ability to evict someone who stops paying rent. Landlords earn maybe 5-12% margins off your rent. Consider it a tip for doing all the hard stuff of home ownership for you.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

HOLY CR*P 🚨 Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon talks about how back in 2017 Los Angeles was forced to admit in a lawsuit they had OVER 1 MILLION ILLEGAL VOTERS on their voter rolls

That’s not all

- LA Voting Rolls have 144% of the total number of eligible residents
- San Diego County earns has 138% registrations, meaning 810,966 ghost voters at the time
- California had a minimum of at least 1,736,556 ghost voters

We know this number has only skyrocketed to levels we can’t even comprehend

California Democrats are rigging their elections

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

@LRPH84 @JMGregorchuk Mine this year isn’t far behind your last years at $798. 😏

[John Solomon @jsolomonReports]

Hey @bariweiss, when Biden admin announced China obtained 40 million of Great Britain’s publicly available voter files @CBSNews covered it seriously. But when DJT announced China got 240 million of Americans voter files your team dismissed like it was no big deal. Why?

[Rose Smith @itsrosesm]

You don't have to believe the President's Speech. That's YOUR Choice. Not Broadcasting it takes that Choice away. That's what the Communists do

[Jennifer Van Laar @jenvanlaar]

How does this explosive story on @GavinNewsom awarding a no-bid contract to @JenSiebelNewsom's friend's nonprofit, Baby2Baby, only have 14k views after 18 hrs? Is it being suppressed?

Here's some incredible investigative journalism from a longtime Sacramento reporter. For all of you who think CA doesn't have real journalists, please read.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

@ThrillaRilla369 Very well said, and very true.

[OutspokenSamantha @Outspoken_Sam]

CNN, ABC, NBC and other major networks admit to refusing to air the President's address last night.

Instead, they read the information for their audience and decided what they needed to hear.

This isn't being informed. This is being controlled.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

@SaltyGoat17 Thanks ABC NBC CBS.

It reminds me of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, the harder the Ministry tried to suppress information, the more people went looking for the truth themselves. Same thing here.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.

[Ash Dozer @malamutesarefun]

Pretending that our election processes have no weaknesses is neither accurate nor helpful.

Documented vulnerabilities exist in election software, network security, voter data handling, and registration processes. Ignoring them does not make the risks disappear, it allows problems to persist or grow.

The responsible approach is to identify these weaknesses clearly, assess their real risks, and implement targeted fixes.

Doing so strengthens the technical integrity of our elections and builds greater public confidence in the results.

When voters see that weaknesses are being acknowledged and addressed, trust in the system increases.