Malcolm Lerider

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

I agree with this.

https://t.co/0ly3hKzNhj

[Ricardo Prado @ricklock99]

With the network in its current state and its users effectively abandoned, NGD's priority is a recovery program for people who left assets idle for over half a decade.

Those tokens should be declared permanently lost, and everyone who migrated on time accepted that finality. Reopening it rewards inaction, spends resources on a non-problem, and feeds fresh supply back into the market as sell pressure.

The process makes it worse. A private Google Form with no transparent, formal verification is a black box and invites the same opaque migrations it is supposedly meant to prevent.

If the goal were honest accounting, the fix is simple: burn every unmigrated asset. That rewards the holders who actually showed up, provides a clean, verifiable supply, and closes the door on discretionary reissuance.

Given the unresolved questions surrounding FLM/FUSD, NGD should not propose anything until its own practices are explained.

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

This is not working. At all.

There are 21 council members against two founders.

Fix this or step down.

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

CALL TO ACTION

@Neo_Blockchain $NEO

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

Here is what the community need to do:

Demand the temporary committee roster.
Demand the business case for every line item.
Demand Da to break silence.
Demand the Council to explain, publicly, why it hasn't intervened.
Demand the Council to take control of the treasury from both founders.

Not in six months. Now.

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

@testertje777_OG @Linus9311550161 @snakey_rob It is insane.

Where is the business case that states these $1.2M expenses is bringing in more than $1.2M in value?

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

The Neo temporary committee by @erikzhang launched a "transparency" portal.

Let's look at what's actually on it. 👇

1/8

@Neo_Blockchain $NEO

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

The temporary committee was presented as a step up from what came before.

Looking at these numbers, I'm not sure how.

8/8

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

The community deserves answers.

→ Full headcount and role breakdown for the salary line
→ What the 106,540 NEO "infrastructure" transaction actually covers
→ Why https://t.co/nv77IlmlTu shows no details when the objective states to be transparency.

7/8

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

@randgroup Three repetitions minimum required to suggest a pattern and you are stretching for two over a span of 100 years?

Maybe try astrology?

[Malcolm Lerider @MalcolmLerider]

@DyorchainX Both proposals are negotiating positions. The community needs to stop picking sides and start demanding structure.