"I am a scientist..."
Dennis Rancourt demolishes COVID, vaccines, and climate change, he's done his research like a proper scientist should.
Climate Change is a scam, there was no pandemic, and mRNA vaccines are the most dangerous medical product ever forced upon the public.
Potentially killing millions of people, likely many millions more.
The floodgates are buckling, the truth about what has been done cannot be hidden from the remaining unsuspecting public much longer.
And the establishment will unleash hell in order to prevent them from finding out.
Enjoy the talk, and share as widely as possible, make 2024 the year when everyone finally wakes up.
@VivekGRamaswamy Preach Vivek!
Remember Vivek and Trump are the only candidates that are self funded. Everyone else does what the highest bidder tells them to do!
14 Links vaccination and SIDS: Almost no SIDS prior to vaccine programs
https://t.co/yuN3Stkcvd
Over 600 cases of sudden infant death syndrome following vaccination were reported from 1990-1997.
https://t.co/wBWCejlrbV
Vaccination in infants less than 3 months is associated with an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome.
https://t.co/HzNzJQJDsw
Correlation between the number of infant deaths and the number of vaccines
https://t.co/8kTWWTsca6
Serious adverse events associated with whole cell pertussis vaccine, e.g. sudden infant death syndrome and enephalopathy, may have occured in metabolically vulnerable children.
https://t.co/sTEmDvXmcg
Sudden infant death syndrome and DTP vaccine timing may be linked.
https://t.co/MSxGKGVvmx
Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given
https://t.co/yuN3Stkcvd
Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010.
https://t.co/vVNfnvHxhX
Sudden Infant Death syndrome mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DTP was found to be 7.3 times higher than in the period 30 days after immunization.
https://t.co/M3aWwAfLrM
A case of sudden infant death associated with hexavalent immunization has been reported.
https://t.co/KEfoNo2UPx
Hepatitis B vaccination has been linked to anaphylactic shock and death in infants.
https://t.co/vzhipzu3mF
In 1985 twin boys simultaneously succumbed to sudden unexpected deaths two to three hours after vaccination with diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine (DTP). https://t.co/jmeYoI0FmL
Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination has been reported.
https://t.co/LzN7oPmET5
DTP vaccination may contribute to urinary tract disease and sudden infant death syndrome.
https://t.co/5O2P7BOoEh
At a murder scene, we accept the testimony of an eye witness, regardless if they're a janitor or a forensic pathologist. Their testimony is extremely valuable information. (Often determining the life of another). Why does their testimony matter most? Because they were there. They, more than anyone else, know exactly what happened. The same is true for parents of vaccine injured children. No one knows a child better than their Mother. We must accept and value the testimony of thousands upon thousands of parents who bravely tell their childs story. They know exactly when things began to change for their children.
If we care at all about the health of our nations children, we will stop gaslighting, shaming and belittling these parents. We need to stop protecting the most corrupt industry on this planet and start listening to the families that have everything to lose and nothing to gain.
Dr Plotkin (The Godfather of Vaccines) stated on the stand in a custody case- "as a scientist, I can't say vaccines don't cause Autism but as a physician I can."
He excused himself after revealing so much truth about the vaccine industry, when his job was to make vaccines appear safe and effective.
Oops.
Vaccines became my new obsession and I would procrastinate doing my grad school work because I had found another amazing documentary to watch or book to read on vaccines. And it's interesting, during my research for vaccines, I also came to believe many other things I had learned from western medicine were incorrect. So much so, that my friends in school lovingly called me the "voo doo nurse practitioner" and they would ask me all of the time on advice for natural solutions for peoples health problems. But interestingly enough, when the topic of vaccines came up, all of a sudden, I lost all of my credibility and my friends would say "well now you've taken this whole natural thing too far".
I went from "all vaccines for everybody" to "well, maybe not everybody should get every vaccine" to "well, i think vaccines used to be safe, but now there are just too many and it's not safe" to "How could ANYONE think that vaccines are a good idea? And I will NEVER give my children another vaccine and if that means we have to move or I need to home school them, then so be it".
If I could go back in time, my children would have gotten ZERO vaccines and I would have rejoiced knowing that I was doing the best thing I could to hep protect my children. But it took me a full YEAR to get there. All of my family (except my husband) thinks I have totally lost my mind and I am perfectly okay with that.
So here are my 3 takeaways:
1) Let's stop putting medical professionals on a pedestal. Because we don't know jack about vaccines. I mean it...we are not taught ANYTHING about them. Even my dad, who is one of the sweetest and smartest doctors I know and is very pro vaccine even admits that he had "maybe an hour" of vaccine education in med school.
2) Research until you are 100% confident in your decision...whether it's to give your kid every vacccine, or only a few, or none...but whatever your choice is, OWN that decision. You should not vaccinate out of fear, that is not being an empowered parent...it simply means you have not done enough research. If you're saying "Oh my little one's shots are coming up and I don't know what to do! I'm scared to give them and I'm scared not to give them" That means you have NOT done enough research because you are not confident in your decision...keep going until you reach a place of confidence but in the meanwhile, dont' vaccinate...you can always vaccinate later, you can't unvaccinate.
3) Lastly, don't give up on people. Keep speaking the truth. There is a time and a place to share what's in your heart and there's also a right and a wrong way to share it...but don't stop sharing.
When my children were babies, if ANY of my friends had come up to me and said "Amy, I know that you think vaccines are safe, but if you haven't looked at the ingredients in them, I really think you should", I would have listened. I may not have agreed with the person right then and there, but it would have planted a seed that "holy crud, there might be ingredients in there that aren't safe?" and I would have researched.
And yes, you will get people who think you're crazy. That's ok, just move on. There are people out there who are searching for the truth and will know it when they find it..but if you are not speaking the truth, they may never hear it."
**edited to add per request: if you have read this far and would like to share, that is fine by me!
Can anyone explain to me why—if he’s such a dictator—Trump didn’t act like a dictator for 4 years? Because so far, I haven’t heard one actual explanation.
While we’re on the subject, can you explain to me why—if TRUMP is the dictator—one of Biden’s first moves in office was trying to unconstitutionally force Americans to get an experimental shot?
1) Trump was never convicted of “insurrection”
2) No one involved in Jan. 6 was convicted of “insurrection”
3) Trump was never charged with “insurrection”
4) No one involved in Jan. 6 was charged with “insurrection”
5) Trump was acquitted on the 2nd impeachment on charges that related to the events of Jan. 6
6) The 14th Amendment Sec. 3 does not apply to the President.
That is all anyone needs to understand.
Children are sicker than ever. Our food , water, air and the ever expanding Childhood vaccine schedule are all to blame.
A national study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2010, zeroed in on the deterioration in children’s health over time. From 1988 to 2006, there was a doubling of the prevalence of four types of chronic conditions (obesity, asthma, behavior/learning problems and “other” physical conditions), which rose from 12.8% to 26.6% of American children and youth.
A 2011 Academic Pediatrics study “estimated 43% of U.S. children (32 million) currently have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions assessed, increasing to 54.1% when overweight, obesity or being at risk for developmental delays are included.” Pediatric autoimmune conditions are also on the rise. Autism, ADHD, asthma and allergies have doubled since that time, with autism now one in 30 children in some regions in the U.S.
“In 2020–21, the number of students ages 3–21 who received special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) was 7.2 million, or 15 percent of all public school students. Among students receiving special education services, the most common category of disability was specific learning disabilities (33 percent).”
Mounting evidence indicates environmental toxins such as heavy metals, pesticides and herbicides as the principal culprits, while studies link vaccines and toxic vaccine ingredients to a wide range of adverse health outcomes, including seizures, neurodevelopmental disorders and infant death.
As the medical, public health, and government circles remain silent on the social and economic fallout from these toxic exposures, American children have never been so sick.
X Has Already Won
Elon Musk closed the acquisition of Twitter, now X, in October of 2022. Once that deal was closed, a bunch of advertisers left the platform out of fear of their brands being impacted by the new “Freedom of Speech” rules that X was looking to implement.
The premise was that ads would be shown next to content that advertisers don’t want to be associated with, and because X would now allow more “improper” content, the chances of having a negative ad experience could increase.
After leaving the platform for a few weeks, almost all advertisers have come back, albeit with lower ad spends. However, earlier this year, X gave guidance that the platform is near cash-flow neutral, minus debt obligations. This means that even though the platform has suffered losses in terms of ad revenue, the company is close to being self-sufficient.
In other words, no outside cash has to be brought into the company to keep it alive, as long as the trend continues.
Fast forward a few months, and after controversial comments made by Elon and an effort by Media Matters to encourage advertisers to boycott the platform, advertisers left again.
However - just like the first time, after a few weeks, advertisers are beginning to come back. There’s confirmation that Netflix has started to spend ad money on the platform again, and per Elon at his recent conference in Italy, advertisers are beginning to come back to the platform en masse.
I think all of this points to something quite clear - the Overton Window is beginning to shift, and with it, a massively profitable endeavor for advertisers.
For those that are not familiar, the Overton Window is a term used to express what is “acceptable” to be discussed in a given time period. If you compare what is acceptable to be discussed on X today, vs what was acceptable on Twitter pre-acquisition, you can very clearly see that the “acceptable” topics are much more diverse and plentiful. This means that the Overton Window has shifted.
Another example of this is also on YouTube. A few days ago, Mario hosted a space with Elon Musk, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate, and other folks discussing Alex’s reinstatement and a bunch of other topics. These topics pre-acquisition would not be admissible under Twitter’s former rules. What’s really interesting is that after making this edited content available on YouTube, YouTube has a) not taken down the content from the platform and b) allowed monetization on the content.
This implies that advertisers are now becoming comfortable advertising on content that they weren’t comfortable with in the past.
What does this mean for X? It’s quite simple - X’s willingness to stand for Free Speech, even when the CEO makes statements that cause the business to temporarily lose revenue, is creating a brand new market for advertisers that previously did not exist precisely due to an unwillingness to embrace Freedom of Speech.
And because X’s entire approach has been to uphold Freedom of Speech and accept the repercussions that come with it, the platform has positioned itself as the premier place for content that will be generated on this principle.
This same content is a market that advertisers have had 0 access to in the past because of the unwillingness of platforms to embrace Freedom of Speech, and the skittishness of ad agencies to sully their brands with controversial topics. On top of this, it’s a market that is untapped, which will generate billions of views, and billions of dollars, for creators and advertisers alike.
I do not suspect we’ll see another advertisers boycott in the future because of this dynamic. There’s way too much money to be made, and now that the Overton Window has shifted to where the “public” is now “comfortable” with listening to dissenting and controversial opinions, advertisers will be tripping over themselves to advertise on X over the long term.
In my opinion, people respect the notion of being allowed to think for themselves, and because this has been subdued for far too long, there will be an avalanche of interest for content that is specifically challenging and controversial. Ultimately, this will be massively profitable for advertisers due to the engagement and attention it’ll receive from the public.
I posited when Elon bought the platform that X would win if they could make Freedom of Speech profitable, and I think we’re starting to see glimpses of this being the case.
THE PLACEBO LIE | EP 339 @DelBigtree joins @JanJekielek of @EpochTV’s ‘American Thought Leaders’ to detail his journey investigating v*ccines, and to expose one of the biggest lies ever told to the public. #ThePlaceboLie#ICAN#TipoftheIceberg https://t.co/5HkxRPdL2m