@BlueDartCares Sent details in DM
Though everything was already there in my post with screenshot of status tracking.
Kindly help and deliver it tomorrow morning hours.
@BlueDart_@BlueDartCares
Waybill No 18147899475, why this "Prohibited Area-Entry Restricted For Delivery" status. I am not in some cant area. Everyday 1000s of delivery comes to our society and many to my house also. I was expecting an urgent document. Please help urgently.
@UnreservedMERIT@cbseindia29 The more frustrating thing is they don't accept their mistake & try to resolve the issue for the betterment of students. Anyhow they try to prove only they are correct.
Maanviy aadhar se to koi sochta hi nahi...
They behave like they are opponents and try to win the game.
@VinayChaudhry4 Sir kaunsi duniya me ho? abvp ya koi bhi bhajpa related person kuch bol hi nahi sakta.
Rahi Pariksha pe charcha ki baat, maine bhi ye request ki thi ki ab "Parikhas ke Parinam par charcha" bhi kar leni chahiye, bacho ka kuch bhala ho jaayega.
@vineetJindal19@X@cbseindia29 Even my account got banned, for my post regarding the event by Nsarg. I said someone at Reddit is claiming it, pls investigate. X asked me to delete that post to restore my account and that too after 12 Hours. I explained to X and then it restored without deleting the post.
@vineetJindal19@X@cbseindia29 Ask that student to request X to restore the account with giving explanation. They will restore it, as it is not an offense in X terms, to ask questions to any department.
A student submitted an essay she wrote by hand. Her university ran it through an AI detector. The detector said she cheated. She is autistic.
Her name is Moira Olmsted. Adelphi University. February 2026. Turnitin flagged her essay as 100% AI-generated. She was disciplined.
Two other AI detectors classified the same essay as human-written.
She sued. She won. The court called the school's decision "arbitrary and capricious."
She is not the only one.
In May 2026, a high school student in Palo Alto was expelled after an AI detector flagged his work. He faced visa revocation. He filed a federal civil rights lawsuit.
A researcher at Griffith University just proved mathematically why this keeps happening. The paper is on arXiv. The finding is one sentence.
AI text detectors have a structural flaw that no amount of better engineering can fix.
Here is what the math says.
If a university wants its detector to catch 80% of cheaters, at least 750 out of every 10,000 innocent students will be wrongly accused. That is not a software problem. It is a theorem.
If the university tries to limit false accusations to 1%, detection power collapses to 6%. It catches 6 out of every 100 AI-written papers. The other 94 get through.
There is no setting where the detector is both fair and effective.
The reason is diversity. Every student writes differently. Non-native English speakers use simpler vocabulary. Shorter sentences. Clearer structures. So does AI. A Stanford study found that 61.3% of TOEFL essays written by non-native English speakers were misclassified as AI-generated. A separate analysis tested 14 commercial detection tools. Zero out of 14 reached 80% accuracy.
The students most likely to be wrongly accused are non-native English speakers, neurodivergent students, and anyone who writes with clarity and precision. The qualities that make their writing effective are the same qualities the detector mistakes for a machine.
Vanderbilt University understood this. They disabled Turnitin's AI detection in 2023 after calculating that even a 1% error rate across 75,000 submissions would produce 750 wrongful accusations per year.
750 students accused of cheating for writing like themselves.
The paper's conclusion is not that we need better detectors. It is that the diversity of human writing itself makes accurate detection mathematically impossible.
The same thing that makes your writing yours is the thing that gets you accused.
https://t.co/L91ldtXP05
@the_hindu@dawalelo substantial increase?
So how do you see it?
How effective was OSM?
And what about the cases where students' number in a subject got reduced even when they did not applied for revaluation of that subject.
@TheAnuragTyagi@nabilajamal_ Ye to inko pahle initiative lena chahiye tha, ab tak to kaam poora ho bhi gaya hota. Lekin wo chahte hi nahi ki aisa ho, kuch bhi kah lo, kuch bhi kar lo, ye nahi karenge. Inki naak neechi nahi ho jaayegi agar aisa inhon kar diya to?
@Nitinchaudharry@cbseindia29 I am somehow getting this feeling that the answer sheets were not given to teachers. These are evaluated by some AI which could not interpret the scanned copies of hand written sheets. Otherwise how would a real teacher would miss such a trivial thing.
@IAbhay_Pratap@cbseindia29 There r many reported incidents where just by 1 marks they r having failed status. Many have reported that even MCQs marked wrong, were actually correct as per Marking scheme. Still not given marks in revaluation. How fair? I think they are using AI for so many applications.