@jpthor@littlebunny1899@TheDivingPaaao Had the same issues on a linux laptop last week. My iPhone/ipad nodes worked fine.
Only get one chance to onboard users. Once you fix these and add ruji features Iβll move everything to vultisig
@Harmfultweeter@ThorTrades8 always aimed is quite the stretch. 10% makes 0 sense to me.
40-50% maybe? Fully depends on what kind of revenue the dapps start creating. RUNE will follow in due time. Currently its mainly speculation given minimal apps are up generating rev
@kylekrason@RujiraNetwork Doesnt help that a swap frontend isnt a complicated thing to build.
Regardless, if Ruji does well, naturally Rune should follow (assuming its driven by rev and not fully speculative). I think the future is bright
@kylekrason@RujiraNetwork not sure I see it as a TC mistake but I get it. with a 50/50 split, I see Ruji/Rune as the same thing
its hard to rebrand things at this point but I kinda foresee a merge in 1-2 years. As which point many of the issue discussed this week go away.
@kylekrason@RujiraNetwork 4.1 ruji leading/funding marketing might be the best bet here. new token/kid on the block has value and its the shiny new toolkit to drive revenue
@kylekrason@RujiraNetwork 1. besides security, this incentivizes buying rune and bonding with high APR (hopefully!)
2. I'm more excited for the auto bonding contract. one-click staking is important
3. Im pro TC FE (cough-cough ruji swap) but dont think it has the impact many do
4. dedicated marketing?
@weidai6502@KentonC137 @proof_steve @THORChain this is really my only issue with the proposed; otherwise im in favor.
I still think long term a ruji/rune merge with ruji/rune swap being the 0 affiliate front end makes the most sense
@SliceTank @KentonC137@kylekrason@THORChain@Thormax20 In my world view, rujira shouldnt be concerned with rev from swaps. It should be concerned with building the best core dapps and composable building blocks for builders on top of TC.
In the long term (1-2 years?), I see a ruji/rune merge which is why I posed this thought
@thinkwhysly@KentonC137@kylekrason@THORChain@Thormax20 For the record Iβm anti-merge until Ruji establishes itself and merge conditions make sense
But I think long term aligning everything under a single investable, rev driven token is logical
@thinkwhysly@KentonC137@kylekrason@THORChain@Thormax20 Yeah thatβs fair, I also was confused when I was introduced to TC. I just have doubts on how effective itβll be or who would build it
As much as both communities hate it; merging Ruji/rune or even just rebranding in some ways would address this with Ruji swap as the interface
@KentonC137@kylekrason@THORChain@Thormax20 What does "success of the front end" really mean to you?
To me the biggest barrier to buying rune is the access to rev through bonding. I will always buy TCY over RUNE because of this and find that to be a larger issue than a dedicated frontend.
@KentonC137@kylekrason@THORChain@Thormax20 Kenton, what are your thoughts on just leaning into Rujira swaps as the defacto TC frontend with no affiliate fee?
Serves the case mentioned above and attracts new users to the new dapps all in the same one-stop-shop.