Sławek Maloicki

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

Illegal migrants in Spain’s Ceuta have broken into and vandalized at least six schools, leaving behind damaged doors, smashed windows, garbage, alcohol bottles and human waste, less than a month before Spanish students return to class.

Ceuta's government estimates that around 11,000 illegal migrants remain in the city.

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

🇪🇸 Five stabbing attacks happened in a matter of four days in Barcelona, Spain.

Such occurrences have become a norm in many European cities largely due to irresponsible open border policies of left-wing governments.

The people of Spain are not safe under the Far-Left Socialist government of Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who is allowing mass immigration into Spain, with plans to legalize up to 1.3 million undocumented migrants.

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

If you are going to rely on coal... Convince the rest of the world to abandon it. Brilliant.

[Szymon Janus @sjanus_pl]

Żeby się wam za dobrze nie spało.

Wiecie o tym, że Fundacja PZU (@GrupaPZU, pozdrawiam) finansuje podcast "Fakt, nie opinia" Instytutu Narutowicza?

W pierwszym odcinku niejaki Bilewicz opowiada antypolskie bzdury razem z niemieckim historykiem Grzegorzem Rossolińskim-Liebe (finansowanym zresztą przez Niemców), o rzekomej kolaboracji polskich burmistrzów z nazistami.

Tak, za wasze pieniądze polski instytut promuje antypolską, wielokrotnie obaloną, propagandę. Wprost pluje się Polakom w twarz, oskarżając o współudział w holokauście.

A co to ten Instytut Narutowicza? Obecnie rządzący nie mogli zdzierżyć istnienia Instytutu Dziedzictwa Myśli Narodowej im. Romana Dmowskiego i zmienili nazwę na Narutowicza. Niestety nikt nie jest w stanie wskazać czym była "myśl polityczna" Narutowicza.

Dyrektorem w instytucie została niejaki Adam Leszczyński. Członek Krytyki Politycznej, założyciel https://t.co/SsgBGqS19g.

Jego zastępcą jest za to wyjątkowa antypolska gnida - Przemysław Witkowski. Tropiciel "faszyzmu", ekspert od "ekstremizmów", sam będący antifiarzem powiązanym z rosją. Publikował na prorosyjskim portalu Strajk oraz donosił na polskich dziennikarzy na Białorusi.

Ktoś zapyta w PZU ile zapłacili za ten antypolski ściek?

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

The international mainstream media barely wrote anything about it but Russia killed 27 Ukrainian civilians in ballistic missile, glide bomb and suicide drone strikes just yesterday:

Zaporizhzhia - 12 killed
Donetsk region - 6 killed
Poltava region - 5 killed
Dnipro - 4 killed

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

Civilians have been killed during an evacuation in Kherson Oblast

Volunteers found the bodies of a man and a woman on a rural road.

They were trying to evacuate on a moped when they came under fire.

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

🇳🇱 Outrage in the Netherlands as videos go viral of police attacking anti-migration protesters in Loosdrecht

People had gathered in front of a planned ad hoc asylum center that will house 110 men from the Third World in the small town of just 8000 inhabitants

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

A 14-year-old has been arrested in NYC after stomping on a 15-year-old girl’s head for refusing to give him her phone number

🇺🇸

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

New peer-reviewed research just dropped… and it’s awkward.

A study released today using actual U.S. station data (1899–2025) finds no significant trend in summer daytime highs and even declines in some temperature extremes.

Let that sink in.

Because the Fifth National Climate Assessment confidently told us extreme heat is accelerating.

The data, however, begs to differ.
https://t.co/kOXMQ7THZj

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

A man has finally been charged for knocking out an Irish woman who was out on town with her friends on a Saturday night in Cork on Nov. 23rd.

The man is named Abdelilah Habbouly.

He was immediately released on bail

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Muslims have destroyed thousands of churches across the Middle East and forced 2 million indigenous Christians to flee their homes.

They consider Christians infidels who must convert, pay jizya, or be killed.

Zero outrage by leftists or Muslims!

[Jonathan Cohler @cohler]

The Emperor Has No Clothes: How the IPCC Built a 38-Year Climate Empire on a Circle of Lies
Summary of my talk at ICCC16 on April 8, 2026.
The papers underlying this analysis are available at https://t.co/TiXR6dk7Uk.

For nearly four decades, the world has been told a story. The story goes like this: the Earth is warming at an alarming rate, humans are causing it by burning fossil fuels, and unless we spend trillions of dollars to stop it, catastrophe awaits. Governments have reorganized their economies around this story. Children have grown up afraid of it. Scientists who questioned it have been ostracized.

There is just one problem. The scientific foundation of that story — every single number the IPCC uses to tell it — is physically meaningless. Not uncertain. Not debatable. Physically meaningless, in the same way that the average of everyone's phone numbers in Washington, DC is meaningless. You can calculate it. The arithmetic works out fine. But the result tells you absolutely nothing about reality.

This is not a fringe claim. It is a mathematical and physical demonstration, built on peer-reviewed papers and the foundational principles of thermodynamics. And once you see it, you cannot unsee it.

The First Lie: A Temperature That Does Not Exist

Everything begins with the Global Mean Surface Temperature, or GMST. This is the single number — usually expressed as an anomaly from a pre-industrial baseline — that the entire IPCC enterprise is built upon. When you hear that the Earth has warmed 1.2 degrees since the industrial revolution, you are hearing about GMST. When climate models project warming of 2 or 3 or 4 degrees by 2100, they are projecting changes in GMST. When the Paris Agreement sets a limit of 1.5 degrees, it is a limit on GMST.

So what exactly is GMST? Here is where the story starts to unravel.

Temperature, in physics, is what is called an intensive property. That means it describes the state of a specific physical system — a system that has boundaries, that is in or near thermal equilibrium, that has a single governing equation of state. You can meaningfully talk about the temperature of a cup of coffee, or a room, or the ocean at a particular depth, because each of those is a defined physical system. What you cannot do, without violating the laws of thermodynamics, is aggregate temperatures across systems that are not in thermal contact with each other and call the result a "temperature."

The Earth's surface is not a thermodynamic system. It is a patchwork of thousands of local systems — deserts and rainforests, polar ice sheets and tropical oceans, mountain peaks and valley floors — none of which are in thermal equilibrium with each other. Averaging their temperatures produces a number, yes. But that number is not a temperature in any physically meaningful sense. It has no equation of state governing it. There is no physical law that connects it to anything. It is, as physicist Christopher Essex and colleagues demonstrated rigorously in a 2007 paper, simply not a temperature.

This is not a technicality. It is the kind of category error that, in any other field of science, would end a research program immediately. Averaging intensive properties across non-equilibrium systems is like averaging the zip codes of everyone in New York City and then using the result to give someone directions. The arithmetic produces a number. The number means nothing.

The International Organization for Standardization recognized this implicitly decades ago. ISO was tasked in 2002 with defining all important terms related to climate change — and to this day, "global average temperature" does not appear in their completed definitions. The omission is not an oversight. ISO's mandate requires metrological rigor, and "global average temperature" cannot survive it.

Neither the IPCC nor any climate agency has ever produced a rigorous physical definition of GMST. They use it constantly — it appears in virtually every chapter of the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report — but they have never defined what physical quantity it represents, because no such definition is possible.

The Second Lie: Models Built on Nothing

If GMST is physically meaningless, what are the IPCC's climate models actually doing?

The answer is uncomfortable. Every major climate model used by the IPCC — the ensemble known as CMIP, the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project — is tuned to reproduce historical GMST trends. These models have hundreds of adjustable parameters, and those parameters are set so that the model's output matches the observed GMST record. This is called validation: you adjust the model until it fits the data, and then you declare that the model has been validated against observations.

But if GMST is not a physically meaningful quantity, then tuning a model to reproduce it is not validation. It is curve-fitting against a number that has no physical content. The model learns to reproduce a mathematical artifact, not a physical reality. And because these are coupled global circulation models — where temperature interacts with precipitation, wind, ocean currents, sea ice, and dozens of other variables — the corruption spreads everywhere. Every projection the model produces, for every variable, inherits the original meaninglessness.

The implications are staggering. Every temperature projection. Every sea level projection. Every extreme weather projection. Every carbon budget. Every remaining-emissions calculation. All of it flows from models validated against a quantity that does not physically exist.

The Third Lie: An Ocean That Was Never Measured

Recognizing that surface temperature records were contested and unreliable, the IPCC developed a second line of evidence: ocean heat content, or OHC. The argument was straightforward — if the planet is accumulating energy from the greenhouse effect, that energy must be going somewhere, and most of it should be going into the oceans. Measure the ocean's heat content over time, and you have a direct measurement of the planet's energy imbalance.

This argument sounds compelling. It rests on a program called Argo — a network of roughly 4,400 robotic floats deployed across the world's oceans, each one diving to 2,000 meters and rising back to the surface every ten days, transmitting temperature and salinity profiles along the way. Argo is a genuine scientific achievement, an engineering marvel that has produced an enormous amount of valuable oceanographic data.

But here is what Argo was actually designed to do, according to its founding documents from 1998: observe the evolving physical state of the upper ocean, track regional patterns of heat and salinity, support weather forecasting, and complement satellite altimeters. Global ocean heat content and Earth's energy imbalance are mentioned nowhere. The program was not designed for that purpose, and its design is fundamentally unsuited to it.

The problem begins with basic physics. When an Argo float ascends from 2,000 meters to the surface over six to ten hours, it collects roughly 1,000 temperature measurements along the way. But the float is drifting the entire time. By the time it surfaces and phones home via satellite, it may be fifty kilometers from where its deepest measurements were taken. Those measurements are all assigned to the surface GPS position — the only location that is actually known. The actual underwater trajectory is entirely unknown. Every single data point below the surface is assigned to the wrong location.

Then the interpolation begins. Those 12,000 real measurements per month — already spatially misassigned — are used to fill 45,000 three-dimensional grid cells covering the global ocean. The vast majority of the ocean is not measured at all; it is calculated. The polar regions, coastal zones, and marginal seas are largely excluded. About half the total ocean volume, including all water below 2,000 meters, is simply ignored. The calculations use correlation functions that blend measurements from water masses hundreds or even thousands of kilometers apart, destroying any local information the floats actually captured.

The anomalies computed from this process — the differences from a historical baseline — then run into the same fundamental physics problem as GMST. Temperature is an intensive property. You cannot meaningfully average temperature anomalies across non-equilibrium volumes of ocean any more than you can average them across the Earth's surface. The resulting number has units attached to it, and the arithmetic is consistent, but it does not represent a physical reality.

When all the genuine sources of uncertainty are properly quantified — the untracked trajectories, the interpolation errors, the deep ocean ignorance, the polar gaps, the mismatched measurement frameworks — the true uncertainty in the derived Earth Energy Imbalance figure is greater than plus or minus one watt per square meter at 95% confidence. The IPCC's AR6 reports it as 0.7 plus or minus 0.2 watts per square meter. The actual uncertainty is roughly five times larger than the signal being measured. The result is statistically indistinguishable from zero.

The Fourth Lie: Satellites Adjusted to Match the Fiction

The IPCC presents its ocean heat content figure and its satellite-derived energy imbalance figure as two independent lines of evidence that agree with each other. This agreement is cited as powerful confirmation that the Earth is accumulating energy at the rate claimed.

What the IPCC does not prominently advertise is how that agreement was achieved.

NASA's CERES instruments — satellites measuring the radiation budget at the top of the atmosphere — produce raw measurements with an absolute uncertainty of roughly three to five watts per square meter. The signal the IPCC claims to be measuring is 0.7 watts per square meter. The satellites, on their own, cannot resolve it.

So what was done? The CERES data were adjusted — via a least-squares optimization — to force agreement with the Argo-derived ocean heat content estimate. The IPCC's own AR6 documentation acknowledges this directly: the CERES fluxes "were adjusted, within the estimated uncertainties, to ensure that the net TOA flux was consistent with the estimated Earth's energy imbalance based on ocean heat content measurements."

In other words: they adjusted the satellites to match the floats, and then cited the match as independent confirmation. That is not science. That is circular reasoning with extra steps.

This is not unprecedented behavior in the IPCC ecosystem. Kevin Trenberth, one of the architects of the ocean heat content framework, wrote in a now-famous 2009 email obtained through the ClimateGate disclosure: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in August shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong." When the satellites disagree with the models, the satellites are wrong. When the satellites are adjusted to agree, that agreement is cited as confirmation. The game is rigged by construction.

The Fifth Lie: The CO₂ Fingerprint That Was Never There

The final pillar of the IPCC's case is carbon dioxide attribution. Yes, CO₂ has risen in the atmosphere. Yes, human industrial activity emits CO₂. But the IPCC goes further, claiming that the rise in atmospheric CO₂ is almost entirely anthropogenic — that natural processes cannot account for it, and that the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO₂ provides an unambiguous human fingerprint.

This claim rests on the Bern model, a mathematical framework describing how CO₂ moves between the atmosphere and natural reservoirs. The Bern model has a particularly alarming feature: it predicts that a substantial fraction of CO₂ emitted today will remain in the atmosphere for centuries or millennia. The IPCC's AR5 report states that fifteen to forty percent of emitted CO₂ will persist in the atmosphere for more than a thousand years. This is the foundation of carbon budgets and net-zero targets.

The Bern model has been falsified by evidence that has been sitting in plain sight for sixty years.

When atmospheric nuclear testing peaked in the early 1960s, it injected a massive pulse of radioactive carbon — bomb carbon-14 — into the atmosphere. This pulse has been tracked continuously ever since. If the Bern model were correct, that pulse should decay slowly, with a substantial permanent fraction remaining. Instead, it decays as a single exponential with an e-folding time of about seventeen years. The bomb carbon is gone. It cycled through the system and was absorbed — completely — in roughly half a century. The multi-exponential Bern model, with its permanent airborne fraction, is simply wrong. CO₂ does not persist in the atmosphere for millennia. It cycles through in years to decades.

The isotopic evidence tells the same story. The carbon isotope ratio in atmospheric CO₂ — the quantity called delta-13C — is supposed to be declining as fossil fuel CO₂, which is isotopically light, mixes into the atmosphere. The IPCC treats this decline as the smoking gun of human causation.

But a 2024 peer-reviewed study by Prof. Demetris Koutsoyiannis examined the actual isotopic data carefully and found something the consensus narrative cannot accommodate: the net isotopic input signature to the atmosphere has been essentially unchanged since the Little Ice Age. The value has remained stable — globally, across all major measurement sites, throughout the entire period of industrialization. A changing human fingerprint should show up as a changing net signature. It does not. The isotopic composition is consistent with natural biosphere dominance and an undetectable human contribution.

The reason is not mysterious. The biosphere — plants, soils, oceans — cycles roughly twenty-five times more carbon per year than human industrial emissions. Natural processes are overwhelmingly dominant. Human emissions are noise on top of a vast natural signal. And temperature, not human activity, drives the dominant part of that signal: warming causes the biosphere to exhale more CO₂, which raises atmospheric concentrations. The causality runs from temperature to CO₂, not the reverse.

5 x 0 = 0

Step back and look at the full picture.

The IPCC's case for human-caused climate catastrophe rests on five interlocking metrics: GMST, the climate models tuned to it, ocean heat content, Earth's energy imbalance derived from ocean heat, and CO₂ attribution. Each one is presented as an independent line of evidence. Together, the IPCC says, they constitute overwhelming proof.

But they are not independent. They form a circle. GMST is physically meaningless. The models are tuned to GMST and inherit its meaninglessness. Ocean heat content is computed through a process that violates measurement physics and is statistically indistinguishable from zero. Earth's energy imbalance is derived from ocean heat content and confirmed by satellites that were adjusted to match it. CO₂ attribution rests on a model falsified by nuclear bomb data and an isotopic fingerprint that does not exist in the observations.

Each element of the chain depends on the others. None stands independently. The IPCC calls this "multiple lines of evidence." But five times zero is still zero.

What This Means

None of this proves that the climate is not changing, or that human activity has no effect on the atmosphere. Climate changes continuously, and has for billions of years. What it demonstrates is that the specific metrics the IPCC uses to quantify the crisis — every number that drives the policy, every figure that justifies the spending, every projection that frightens the public — are built on a foundation that does not survive contact with basic physics.

The International Organization for Standardization could not define global average temperature because it fails metrological requirements. Four different AI systems, presented with the mathematical arguments, reached the same conclusion independently. The emperor has no clothes — and even the tools his court built to defend him can see it.

For thirty-eight years, an enormous scientific and political infrastructure has been constructed on top of these metrics. Trillions of dollars in spending have been justified by them. Careers, institutions, and international agreements depend on them. Questioning them has been treated as heresy.

But physics does not negotiate. A number that has no physical meaning does not acquire one because important people find it useful. A measurement indistinguishable from zero does not become evidence of a crisis because a satellite was adjusted to agree with it. A model falsified by sixty years of bomb carbon data does not become valid because it has been cited ten thousand times.

The work is done. The papers are published. The mathematics is there for anyone who wishes to examine it. The question now is not scientific. It is whether the institutions that built their empires on these numbers will acknowledge what the physics has always been trying to tell them.

The emperor has no clothes. He never did. And it is long past time to say so.

The presentation "The Emperor Has No Clothes" was delivered at the 16th International Climate Change Conference, Washington DC, April 8–9, 2026.

👇👇👇👇👇

[Dr Robert Ian Holmes PhD @1000Frolly]

Hansen, easily the biggest fraudster in history?
Oh boy where do I start?
This is an activist who got his PhD by claiming that Venus is hot due to a so-called "Greenhouse Effect"!
What an absolute JOKE.

This activist got promoted to be the head of GISS, where he tampered with the data for decades, to force it to fit his fake CO2-driven models.

Hansen's data tampering has been documented (since 1999) at Real Science;
https://t.co/BxhH5U7HtF
https://t.co/Hjbeo1smma
https://t.co/RCkSJqLmUF
https://t.co/4uZa4TgR5V
https://t.co/50YB3OeQI8
https://t.co/QaRbHj24VC
https://t.co/Z6VsbAvDwu
And at Milton Conservative;
https://t.co/2jDJnRvwFA
Nov 2015; massive new NOAA climate data fraud exposed by journalist Günter Ederer on the site Principia Scientific, data checked by Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert;
https://t.co/gQw64LtcYk
The methods employed were;
• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.
Real Climate Science has found a ‘special +1c anomaly temperature fraud’ which was apparently especially concocted for the Paris COP21 meeting in December, 2015;
https://t.co/77MdQ154Jj
Now you can get the global temperature you want to order – exactly when you need it!
Incredibly, the ‘scientists’ at NASA even knew what the October 2015 temperature would be – within 0.01c – even BEFORE they had calculated any of the data!
Another site has been monitoring all the data tampering in all the datasets since 2006;
https://t.co/jlaU47XyJ9

The UK’s CRU have also recently switched from HadCRUT3 to HadCRUT4 to try and bump up the record, because 3 was cooling strongly. They have fraudulently lowered 1998 by 0.1c in HadCRUT4 and boosted 2007 by 0.25c to make it appear that 1998 was not the hottest.
See the adjustments that were made after 2008 here;
https://t.co/BpBV4UIPSI MaturityDiagram
Here is HadCRUT3 and 4 compared;
https://t.co/kUHy13Rd53
The most reliable long-term record we have is HadCRUT3, which shows just 0.3c of warming in the last 75 years; that is - a rate of warming of 0.4c per century.

An overview of the 'adjustments' to NOAA's NCDC temperature record can be found here;
https://t.co/GVUf8u1HFz
Only the changes done since 2006 have been documented; even so this has amounted to about 0.2c over the 20th century. The effect of the changes is to make all temperatures recorded prior to 1945 cooler and all those after 1945 warmer, resulting in a much steeper rise in 20th century temperatures.
Data fraud at the NCDC;
https://t.co/GVUf8u1HFz
Data fraud at NOAA with poorly-sited US stations;
https://t.co/emEQVFnwgi
Data fraud at the UK’s MET;

https://t.co/7vGrIuQT04
Anthony Watts; https://t.co/KP61RGegTb
Data fraud in Brazil; https://t.co/Xm5QWhGuUC

Even the Russians have documented the fraud of their datasets by the UK’s MET and the CRU;
https://t.co/sKqC2wzK9p
https://t.co/7vGrIuQT04
Data fraud in Australia at BOM;
https://t.co/ku29zdxzEK
https://t.co/K9mKeBZBHP
https://t.co/4KjW082Sqh
https://t.co/izp8BMADXA
If just the raw data itself is used, Australia's hottest year was 1885.
Data fraud at New Zealand’s NIWA;
https://t.co/T3BeRJ0Qxt
Switzerland have been caught too; Science journalist Markus Schär of the Swiss news weekly Weltwochediscovered the Swiss Meteorological Service (SMS) tampered with its datasets as well.
https://t.co/wbHx3ulCuH
More tampering has been found, this time in Paraguay;
https://t.co/f6rzhWDVYh

And in the Arctic;
https://t.co/gK5tWhRzJA
GAST temperature fraud in detail as reported by Dr Idso, Dr Wallage and Dr D’Aleo;
https://t.co/eQj7qnikAF
Investigations are now being carried out into all this data fraud in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and in the UK.

Activist Hansen is arrested YET AGAIN;
10:52 AM · Apr 20, 2026

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

29 Muslim men charged with the repeated rape and sexual exploitation of a single 13-year-old Girl in West Yorkshire's Calderdale area.

This is another horrific chapter in Britain's grooming gang scandals — groups of men, overwhelmingly of Pakistani Muslim heritage, systematically targeting vulnerable young British girls over years.

The victim was just 13 when the abuse allegedly began, part of a pattern seen in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, and now Calderdale where authorities repeatedly failed to act decisively due to fears of "racism" accusations.

These aren't isolated incidents. Decades of official inquiries and convictions show the same profile: organized networks exploiting girls with gifts, drugs, and violence, while too many in positions of power looked the other way to protect "community relations."

[Adam Gwiazda @delestoile]

🇧🇪 Quaregnon. Rodzina zmarłego przed rokiem Samira Benbouali jest zszokowana i oburzona. Podczas odwiedzin grobu ich męża i ojca zastali w sąsiedztwie chrześcijańską mogiłę, w części cmentarza, którą rodzina uważała za parcelę muzułmańską. „To jest jak zdrada”
„Zgodnie z naszymi przekonaniami i wierzeniami coś takiego nie powinno nawet istnieć. Kiedy modlimy się za muzułmanina, a tuż obok stoi katolik lub protestant, modlitwy nie trafiają do naszego bliskiego.”

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

Russians have published a video showing a drone strike on a Ukrainian passenger train in Kherson

The attack may be part of the so-called “Kherson Safari,” a sadistic “entertainment” of Russian drone operators targeting civilians and civilian vehicles from the occupied left bank of the city as a form of training.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

🚨#BREAKING: The woman who was randomly shot in the face 6 times and st*bbed to de*th while she was walking her dog in Atlanta GA has been identified as 40-year-old Lauren Bullis.

The suspect, “Olaolukitan Adon Abel” was also allegedly in the process of se*ually assaulting her before neighbors came to the scene.

Olaolukitan is charged with 3 other "completely random" shootings and the de*th of another woman.

We do not have to live like this.

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

🇷🇺🇵🇱 Russia launches a propaganda campaign aimed at whitewashing Soviet crimes and denying responsibility for the Katyn Massacre

On the Day of Remembrance for the victims of the Katyn Massacre, an exhibition about “Polish Russophobia” was opened in Katyn. The Russians are once again claiming that the mass murder of Poles was committed by German troops and that the grounds for "Russophobia in Poland" are fictitious.

On April 10, the anniversary of the Katyn Massacre, an exhibition titled “Ten Centuries of Polish Russophobia” opened at the Katyn Memorial Complex, the very site where around 22,000 Polish officers were executed in 1940 by the Soviet secret police, the NKVD, on orders from Joseph Stalin and Lavrentiy Beria.

The exhibition, organized by the Russian Military Historical Society, includes a section on Katyn, where organizers claim that archival materials allegedly point to Nazi Germany’s responsibility for the massacre.

Other sections focus on the removal of Soviet monuments in Poland and the country’s decommunization policies, which the organizers describe as an attempt to suppress political views and erase history.

The exhibition's authors also claim that "modern Polish Russophobia" is represented in the form of Polish support for Ukraine in the war against Russian invaders.

The exhibition also claims that Poles were allies of Adolf Hitler during World War II, and that all campaigns by the Russian army to seize Poland were carried out solely to “liberate Russian lands from Polish rule.”

The Kremlin propaganda exhibition argues that "Russophobia in Poland" has no serious basis for its existence.

The Russian Military Historical Society is a state organization founded by Putin in 2012, and the new exhibition in Katyn wouldn't have been unveiled without orders from the Kremlin.

Russia is now denying responsibility for the Katyn Massacre again, like it did between 1943 and 1990.

[Jens Christiansen @jenshigh]

NO, DENMARK DID NOT RUN ON 100% WIND AND SOLAR FOR AN ENTIRE MONTH!

A headline story is all over the internet right now, claiming that Denmark ran on 100% wind and solar for all of March 2026. This is obviously fake news.

Denmark relies heavily on imported electricity when the wind stops. This also happened for entire weeks in March.

Additionally, biomass was generating a large share of the power continuously for the entire month.

I don't know where this fake news comes from, but it sure is spreading fast. Please share this post so we can debunk this false claim!

[David M. McIntosh @DavidMMcintosh]

Illegal immigrants killed 13,000 Americans in 2024.

The total number of homicides in the US in 2024 was 20,162.

That's 64% of all murders.