Malrob

Christian, Conservative, Rejector of Climate Change, Believer in reliable cheap power by coal or nuclear, no DM

[Glenn Grant @GlennGr17517162]

@GuntherEagleman

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

🚨 Three innocent young women dead, and the men accused of killing them had 14, 39 and 72 PRIOR ARRESTS between them.

That's 125 ARRESTS combined. Every single one was a chance to keep these guys off the street.

The system let them walk anyway. Catch and release, cashless bail, soft-on-crime judges.

The media manufactures outrage over MONKEY noises and hurt feelings for DAYS. These women's names barely made the news.

If you're arrested 72 times, you should NEVER see daylight again.

AND OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS TRASH!

[🕊 @jamesforpeace]

Scepticism of the Russell Brand rape conviction is warranted

Russell Brand was convicted of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault and sentenced to 10½ years. The rape conviction rests on the 2009 allegation by the complainant known as Woman 5. A jury verdict deserves respect, but the evidence on the most serious charge is thin enough that reasonable observers can still doubt it.

Woman 5 was a young fan. On her evidence and that of a friend who was with her, she was selected or pointed out in the foyer of the Hammersmith Apollo shortly after Brand’s show and invited backstage. She told the court she willingly took part in a threesome in the dressing room with Brand and another woman she did not know. A friend described seeing her use her mouth on Brand’s anus while the other woman performed oral sex on him. She had a boyfriend at the time; she later said she refused full penetrative sex that night because of him but still joined in the oral and group activity. She later called the episode a “huge mistake” and said she had not painted herself in a good light.

This sequence is relevant to Brand’s account that the later anal sex was also consensual. Within minutes of meeting him she engaged in highly explicit group sexual activity that included oral sex and rimming. That is not ordinary or reserved sexual behaviour. It is the kind of enthusiastic, boundary-pushing activity that makes Brand’s claim—that she agreed to anal sex when they later met at his house—more plausible on its face than it would be for a complainant whose prior contact with him had been limited or non-sexual. Days later she went to Brand’s house knowing, by her own account, that they would have sex. The encounter began with what she described as consensual vaginal sex; she alleged it became rape when he turned her over for anal penetration without her consent, ignored her requests to stop, and afterwards told her to clean up the mess.

Friends and family later gave evidence that, near the time, she had described the anal act as non-consensual and painful and had said she asked him to stop. A sexual-health nurse’s written statement, read to the court, recorded that Woman 5 had told her Brand “had anal sex without a condom and she didn’t want that and didn’t consent to that.” The wording is narrower than a blanket claim of non-consent to anal sex itself. The jury appears to have placed considerable weight on the fact that she told multiple people a similar story soon afterwards. That is not proof the story was true. A person can give a consistent but inaccurate or incomplete account to friends, family, and a nurse. Self-blame, embarrassment about the earlier threesome, or a desire to explain pain and regret can all produce a coherent narrative that later hardens into an allegation of rape. Pain, bleeding, or discomfort after anal sex is also not diagnostic of non-consent; it is a common consequence of rough or insufficiently prepared anal sex even when both parties have agreed to it.

Yet in 2023, after the Channel 4 Dispatches film and while journalists were seeking further accounts, she wrote privately: “I’m not sure my story has much in it. I was an idiot, young and stupid, probably as much to blame.” That is not the language of someone who had already settled on a clear narrative of rape. She formalised the allegation only later.

A detail frequently cited in support is a text exchange she recalled from the Edinburgh Festival months later, in which Brand is said to have called her “dirty,” she replied that he had treated her “like an animal,” and he answered “I’m sorry.” No phones or records survive. A boyfriend from the period saw that Brand was texting her but could not recall the content. Friends later heard her account of the messages; none independently confirmed the wording. Much of the media has nevertheless reported the exchange as established fact rather than an uncorroborated memory.

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

Hamas filmed themselves killing Jews and celebrated it on October 7, 2023. The vast majority of Gazans cheered. That is who they are. Gaza is burning because of what they did that day.

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Why do most Christians stand by in silence while other Christians are being killed? Why won’t Christians get off their butts and vote? What are they waiting for? Their house to burn the ground? Do they not see it will be too late then.

[אור חיים @orchaimbar]

אני מזהיר רק נתניהו ולא אחר יוכל להנהיג את המדינה שלנו!

[The Truth Seeker No. 1203562 @seeker1203562]

JULIE Y MELISSA NO FUERON VÍCTIMAS DE UN MONSTRUO… FUERON VÍCTIMAS DE UN ENCUBRIMIENTO DE ESTADO.

Dos niñas de 8 años fueron violadas y filmadas mientras la policía belga registraba la casa y oía sus gritos.

Dutroux ya había sido condenado por violar a niñas y lo soltaron antes de tiempo. El juez que empezaba a destapar la verdad fue apartado del caso.

Michel Nihoul organizaba fiestas con VIPs y élites. Testigos X declararon sobre redes de poder, orgías y asesinatos de niños… y muchos de esos testigos aparecieron muertos en circunstancias “extrañas”.

La investigación no falló por incompetencia. Fue saboteada para proteger a la élite pedófila belga. Julie y Melissa murieron mientras el sistema los protegía a ellos.

¿Hasta cuándo vamos a seguir llamando “errores” a lo que fue un encubrimiento?

Comparte esto. Que no puedan volver a enterrar la verdad.

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

FRENCH AUTHOR CHARGED FOR CRITICISM OF ISLAM

Michel Houellebecq is a French novelist, filmmaker and singer.

He is known for his 'controversial' views on Islam and demographic replacement.

He has said that Islam is "the dumbest of religions" and has warned "when entire territories come under Islamist control … [violent] acts of resistance will take place"

He has also said:

"the wish of the population with French roots" was "for the violence to decrease, for [Muslim immigrants] to respect the law and people. Or, another good solution, for them to leave."

The Union of Mosques of France filed a legal complaint alleging Houellebecq of "encouraging violence" through his remarks.

In 2015, he published a novel titled 'Submission', imagining France under a Muslim president whose election leads to sweeping political and social changes.

He did this just a day after the the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. One of the victims of that murderous terrorist attack on freedom of speech just so happened to be a friend of his.

A judge has now charged him with "complicity in incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence"

Houellebecq’s attorneys told Le Monde that the "[incriminating] remarks have no dimension of incitement, not even implicitly" and said their client
"[regrets] the increasing judicialization of intellectual debate."

When far left groups and Muslim organisations take people to court to get a politically motivated judge to charge them for speaking freely, that signs the death knell for feedom of speech.

Resist them while you can with every ounce of determination and with every resource you have, or risk losing those freedoms forever.

[Prue MacSween @macsween_prue]

The three stooges, @AlboMP @TurnbullMalcolm & Bobo Bowen pumping up their egos, backslapping fellow grifters & con artists at the Cop Out love-in. High on taxpayer coffee they are lining up for Aussie taxpayer appeasement millions. What they don’t realise is that history will be unkind to them & they will be ridiculed once the climate of reality hits & it’s discovered they have all been played.

[LifeNews.com @LifeNewsHQ]

Passion of the Christ Actor Jim Caviezel Calls Abortion America’s “Great Sin” https://t.co/otxaJuJUo3

[Melinda Richards 🇦🇺🇺🇸 @goodfoodgal]

Sorry….but it’s so obvious…

Not even the looney left can defend it by the “you support rapists” decree.

It’s just too in your face.

[Kirralie Smith @KirralieS]

Victoria- the totalitarian state.

Watch for yourself. Avi was not disturbing the peace. This cop had a bee in her bonnet and is a complete embarrassment.

Australia is in trouble!

[Malrob @malrob17]

@bathelshoshana1 A

[LifeNews.com @LifeNewsHQ]

This is a premature baby born at 22 weeks.

No clump of cells, no parasite, no piece of tissue.

A baby. A human being.

[Malrob @malrob17]

@oliviakelly62 Yes

[NoMoreGulags @FreedomAus80100]

The e Safety commissioner is now recommending to ban VPNs

I recommend we ban her and replace her with nothing

[Alexandra Marshall @ellymelly]

Let me get this straight.

Labor brings in hundreds of thousands of people we don't have room for.

Then uses tens of millions of taxpayer dollars building houses for them.

Then raises taxes on Australians - who didn't ask for any of this.

And if Australians complain about the taxes or their living conditions declining due to mass migration - they're accused of being racist.

Nice work, Labor.

Why not make migrants pay an extra entry fee to fund the construction of homes - or better yet - stop bringing people into a housing crisis.

[Anna Lulis @annamlulis]

Meet Jack. An abortionist tried to kill him, but he survived and was delivered alive. God had different plans. 🙏

[Malrob @malrob17]

@oliviakelly62 Yes

[SaltyGoat @SaltyGoat17]

Muslims live safely in Christian countries

Christians get slaughtered in Muslim countries

In case anyone wasn't clear on the difference