Sandy Rew

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@JesseKellyDC https://t.co/SczUzW9cgc

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@AndrewZywiecMD Perfect one for you- my daughter! Beautiful, fun and ready for babies♥️! Catholic 🙌🏼

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@IAGovernor

[Clinton Donnelly @CryptoTaxFixer]

I was listening to Ron DeSantis talk about eliminating property tax in Florida, and at first I thought, “There’s no way that works.”

Then I heard the details…and it actually made a lot of sense.

The idea isn’t to eliminate property tax for everyone.

It would only apply to primary residences , people who live in Florida full-time.

Snowbirds who come for a few months? They still pay.

Businesses and commercial properties? They still pay.

But, if you own your home and live there permanently, no more yearly tax just to keep what you already own.

And honestly, why should you be taxed every year on something you’ve already paid for?

I saw this in Sweden, property taxes are extremely low, and people can actually stay in their homes for life instead of being forced out when taxes rise.

In the U.S., especially in high-tax states, retirees on fixed incomes often get priced out of their own homes. Some are paying tens of thousands a year just in property taxes.

DeSantis said only about 20% of Florida property is primary residences. The rest is businesses, commercial property, and part-time residents, which makes the numbers more manageable.

The big question is how local governments replace that revenue, especially in rural areas. He mentioned possible state-level revenue sharing.

Personally, I think it’s a really compelling idea, and politically, it’s going to get a lot of attention.

What do you think?

Should homeowners pay property tax forever on their primary residence, or once you own it, should it truly be yours?

Curious to hear different perspectives

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@StuDoesAmerica @glennbeck Would love to hear more about the time Glenn was going to play an abortion live during his program. I assume you were there too- any details on that?? It’s been years ago.

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@SteveDeaceShow To quote Megyn Kelly- “don’t shoot in your own tent”. Good lesson for you, Steve.

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@MartyRew

[Starlink @Starlink]

Starlink Mini offers fast, reliable internet on the go—great for traveling, camping, exploring, boating, RVing, and more.

Easily navigate, stream, and stay connected without dead zones or slow speeds.

Order online in under 2 minutes.

[Mila Joy @Milajoy]

Democrat Stephen A. Smith says January 6th was likely an inside job.

(Well, duh.)

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Who called the hit on Charlie?

We need answers.

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@MartyRew

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

EXPOSED: Gavin Newsom is PAYING FOR BOT FARMS creating massive engagement and support that is ALL FAKE

Reviewing the comments, account after account is fake, random photos or no posts, all low or no followers and repeating the same phrases

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

EXPOSED: Gavin Newsom is PAYING FOR BOT FARMS creating massive engagement and support that is ALL FAKE

Reviewing the comments, account after account is fake, random photos or no posts, all low or no followers and repeating the same phrases

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@HawleyMO @NBCNews No!

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@Y2K_DOTCOM So true. ❤️

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@saar_betty

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@saar_betty

[Mike Benz @MikeBenzCyber]

catch me tonight on @greggutfeld to add salt to this guy’s chardonnay

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@RMConservative Omg 😩

[Mike Benz @MikeBenzCyber]

People are not appreciating the magnitude of the Ed Martin situation. The prosecutor is on top of the FBI. He runs all DC criminal investigations. He is the choke point for DC’s worst secrets. If Ed Martin is blocked, and Boasberg picks, Trump 2.0’s momentum is totally paralyzed.

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@PatUnleashed Nope 😜

[Sandy Rew @mamarew]

@SenMullin Please get the law passed stripping these judges of their power. ASAP

[Megyn Kelly @megynkelly]

F’ing A @dbongino THAT IS A PATRIOT RIGHT THERE. God bless him.

[Jeffrey A Tucker @jeffreytucker]

I'm concerned that many people do not understand the historical and institutional context in which the DOGE labor reforms are unfolding. They look at this as if these are some random, chaotic, arbitrary, strange, and even cruel measures to impose on a devoted civil service.

The reality is very different, and I'm not even sure that Elon entirely understands this. For more than a century, even dating back to 1883, the civil service has grown and grown without check from the elected branch, either the presidency or the legislature . The bureaucracies have ballooned from a few to 450 or so. The bloat and absurdities have grown too.

Get this: no one has ever known what to do about it. Not Coolidge, not Hoover, not Nixon, not Reagan, not Clinton, no one. No president has been able to crack this nut. The only reforms ever to have made it through are those that make the administrative state bigger, never smaller.

Countless cabinet secretaries have come and gone, always with the intention of making a change but leaving saddened, demoralized, outwitted, outgunned, and ultimately devoured.

No president has seriously taken on this problem because they simply did not know how. The unions are powerful, the intimidation from the deep institutional knowledge is overwhelming, the fear of the media as been powerful, and every single president comes to power vaguely feeling threatened by the intelligence agencies. The industries that have captured every single agency were also far too powerful to unseat or control.

This combination of institutional inertia has blocked serious reform for a full century. No one has dared. No one has even had a theory or strategy about what to do about this problem. It had become so terrible that most people in politics have simply surrendered, like homeowners who know there are rats in the basement and bats in the attic but long ago gave up trying to fix the issue.

All this time, the American people have felt themselves ever more oppressed, weighed upon, taxed and regulated, spied upon, brow beaten, and otherwise overwhelmed. Voting never made any difference because the politicians no longer controlled the system. The bureaucracies ruled all.

The Biden years underscored the point. We didn't even need a conscious and present executive. We only needed a figurehead to pretend to be president, just like the Soviet premiers in the old days. The institutions ran everything and the people controlled nothing.

How to deal with this? Trump alone figured it out in his last term: he simply took charge of the agencies in a limited way. There were screams of horror and plots galore. They performed a long stream of clever schemes to destroy him and show him who is boss, which is not the democratically elected president but the forces behind the scenes.

The job of the president, goes the message from all the insiders, is to PRETEND to be in charge but not actually do anything meaningful. Shut up, mug up, obey, and disturb nothing, let the administrative state do its thing without oversight or disruption, and then you will get your honorary library and bestselling autobiography and go down in history as great.

Trump refused the deal and look what happened.

Four years have gone by and Trump is back again, this time with a determination to slay this beast, one that he knows all-to-well. The efforts of DOGE and MAHA and MAGA are epic in scope, breaking a century of pathetic acquiescence toward the deep, middle, and shallow states, at last using moral courage to confront the problem head on, come what may.

They are profoundly aware that they MUST act fast and with some degree of ferocity, even recklessness, else we will default back to the status quo of leaders who pretend to be in charge while the embedded system runs things behind the scenes.

It has been this way for TOO LONG. The voters this time have demanded change, and mustered the faith to believe that change is possible. This is precisely what DOGE is attempting, to make good on a promise, a promise that for once the voters actually believed was credible.

They simply must succeed. There might never be another chance. The way of failure is the path everyone knows the US was on, toward economic stagnation, political scolerosis, and eventual irrelevance in the unfolding of the next stage of social evolution.