A tale of the 2 Spares. Andrew was sacked from being a senior working royal but yet got a new house, kept his security & money to look after himself. PH voluntarily stepped down as a senior working royal & was left homeless, security withdrawn & cut off financially. The major complaint of the unroyals et al is that he was disloyal to the firm by going on Oprah, for writing Spare & Netflix. What did you expect? How did you expect him to survive with a wife & young child? To those who use his actions as a crutch to vilify him, I ask you the same question & say ‘ get over it’, change the record & see that he had no choice. You backed him into a corner. He had every right to tell his truth. You’re all protecting Andrew now so he stays mum even though his actions have been far worse than that of PH. Why do you not vilify Andrew? What are you covering up? What secrets does he hold? It’s time for the truth to be made public
Please dear squaddies, Yall remember how we made #PrinceOfPegging a thing for months. Do the same for the paedophile motherphucker.
Drag him to filth with the hashtag.
#DanWoottonKnew 🤯🤡🤢🤮
"It's not where you start but where you finish that counts." - Zig Ziglar.
Sending positive energy to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in Brussels. They have come a long way since leaving the Royal Family and are making a real difference to the lives of many people globally. 👑👑
Prince Harry made it clear in Brussels. Every child deserves to be safe, everywhere. Period. And Meghan, despite everything happening with her father, showed up for grieving families. That takes courage. I’m incredibly proud of her. Social media companies need to be held accountable.
The U.K. needs to start asking questions of the Govt & the Firm as to why H&M are delivering on the work the unroyal family are paid to do but cannot achieve. Why are we paying them billions of £’s when it is only H&M who successfully deliver the soft power they deem to be the core role of the monarchy? Answers anyone? MP’s?
@NSome1ne@danwootton Dan is flipping out, I think, bc he's realized if TM is prosecuted, there will be discovery. If there's discovery it's in TMarkle's interest to expose his treatment, ie being effectively held in psychological hock, by Brit media & RF. Wonton knew abt the allegations before MM.
@danwootton GFUS and when you are done, GFUS again.
..........
Meghan was told by the MET POLICE that the "allegations" against Thomas Markle Sr. were under investigation, and she was also told, according to reports, not to talk about it.
It's not Meghan who failed; it's the MET POLICE who failed. They didn't investigate or report it to the authorities in the US, Philippines, or Mexico; they stayed quiet.
And most of us know why.
......
Dan Wootton is pathological liar. He knew.
Harry and Meghan spent the night in Brussels ahead of Harrys' speech today.
We just know Harry is being the attentive husband he has always been and wrapping his arms around her. Meghan is a strong woman but she is also a caring human.
#WeLoveYouMeghan ❤️
Meghan looking absolutely gorgeous 🤩🥰. She isn't hiding isn't ashamed isn't excusing. Meghan is here put there fighting for a better World for children. And you can keep on bullying her and attacking her. She knows who she is, she knows what's important.
The Duchess of Sussex has arrived at the European Parliament in Brussels with Prince Harry, where she is attending an online child safety event. It is part of the couple's wider campaigning work supporting families who have lost a child due to online harm through social media. DoS was
expected to make a speech at the event but sources close to the Sussex family say the past two weeks have been emotionally challenging and PH will deliver the speech. Our thoughts and prayers are with her. Our support remains steadfast.
Monday’s Hot Take
What Did Dan Wootton Know?
Dan Wootton wants to know why Meghan Sussex didn’t tell the Met, her private secretary, her communications secretary, or the media about allegations concerning her father.
There’s one inconvenient problem with that attack: the Met already had the fucking letter.
The Met says it received Roslyn Loveless’s letter in January 2019 and passed it to the office of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Meghan says she was assured the allegations were being investigated. She was also reportedly advised against speaking publicly because doing so could jeopardize any potential investigation.
So what exactly was she supposed to report to the police? Why is Wootton interrogating Meghan instead of asking what the Met did with information already in its possession?
Now let’s turn those questions back on Dan.
The Sun has admitted that Loveless spoke to the paper about her concerns in 2018. That means the newspaper heard about those concerns before the Met passed the letter to the Sussexes in 2019.
Wootton was working at The Sun and was promoted to Executive Editor later that year. Yet he now claims he never knew a single thing about allegations concerning Thomas Markle during his time there.
Really, Dan?
The Sun says nothing could be published or investigated further because there wasn’t enough solid evidence. Who made that decision? Was Wootton informed? Was the story dropped because the evidence couldn’t support it, or was it buried because it fucked up the narrative the British press had already decided to sell about Meghan?
Wootton continued putting Thomas Markle in front of cameras to attack his daughter. He even asked Thomas whether Meghan had “always had the capacity to lie.”
Thomas was useful when he could be presented as the heartbroken father abandoned by his cold and dishonest daughter. Serious questions about him would have complicated that profitable little storyline, wouldn’t they?
Now Wootton is branding Meghan a liar because she initially recalled the letter being received in 2018 when the Met’s records place it in January 2019. Her spokesperson acknowledged that she may have been mistaken by a few months and accepted the Met’s time stamped record.
That is called correcting the record. It is not proof that somebody lies about everything.
Wootton expects “I knew nothing” to settle every question about him while treating Meghan’s corrected recollection as a confession of dishonesty. Apparently, “recollections may vary” only when the recollection belongs to Dan.
And since Wootton wants to judge somebody else’s character, his own record is fair game.
Laurence Fox made degrading remarks about journalist Ava Evans on Dan Wootton Tonight. Ofcom found that Wootton’s limited challenge failed to mitigate the offense and instead exacerbated it. GB News suspended him, and he later left the channel.
This is the man we’re supposed to accept as the fearless referee of everybody else’s character?
Wootton has spent years grafting off the Sussexes, turning their family pain into content and feeding his audience its daily dose of Meghan hatred. Keep them angry. Keep her name in the headline. Keep the clicks coming. Then dress the whole rotten operation up as fearless, independent journalism.
That’s not courage. That’s a fucking business model.
Dan Wootton is no neutral referee. He’s a bully with a platform, a mean girl with a microphone, and a grifter whose credibility deserves scrutiny too.
Stop putting Meghan Sussex on trial and answer the damn question, Dan.
What did you know, and when did you know it? @danwootton
There was no advance announcement and no formal role for him to perform.
One witness summed it up simply:
“He just wanted to show some respect.”
NEW:
The Quiet Meaning of Prince Harry’s Remembrance Sunday — https://t.co/4oEBR3uLSX