So far I’ve had midwives & students contact me from the following hospitals… (*EDITED LIST)
Cornwall
Plymouth
Torbay
Exeter
Bristol
Bournemouth
Chelsea & Westminster
Jersey
Kent
Leeds
Newcastle
Glasgow
Edinburgh
Ayr
Sussex
Highlands
*melrose
*dundee
*wishaw
*nottingham
*east Kent
*portsmouth
*homiton
*taunton
*poole
*doncaster
*derby
*grimsby
*scunthorpe
*pinderfield
*raigmore
*aberdeen
*lancaster
*nottingham
*stoke
*leister
*Gloucester
*bath
*London hospitals
*Norfolk and Norwich
*barnstaple
*chelmsford
* Isle of Wight
*nhs Tayside
*nhs Fife
*manchester
*musgrove
*barnstaple
*Northern Ireland
*lincoln
*winchester
* north Tyneside
* north Wales
*wirral
*oxford
* Birmingham
All expressing similar themes
Bullying
Silencing
Harassment
False allegations
Gaslighting
Silenced
Lack of union input
Vexatious referrals to NMC or university
Whistleblowing detriment
Loss of career
Loss of NMC registration
DBS referrals
Lacking of reference for future jobs
False allegations such as
*abuse of legal process
*stealing drugs
*patient death
* racism
*drug errors
*sexual harassment
Further concerns
*sexual assault
*obstetric violence
*GDPR breach
*threatened
*flexible workers/reasonable adjustment staff bullied
*students not signed off
*students bullied by mentors
*students screamed at by midwives
*whatsapp groups set up by managers disclosing staff privacy & private information
*Practice themes
Malpractice
Policy pushing
Dangerous staffing levels
IOL in birthing low risk suites
No awareness of coroner process
Lost body parts
Women having unnecessary c sections
Women left labouring alone
Non clinical UNQUALIFIED STAFF delivering babies (😳)
Deleted records
Amended records
Students left to deliver care unsupervised
Midwives suspended without reasons
NMC referrals never disclosed to midwives
Meetings without union reps - trickery.
All PETRIFIED to speak out.
Welcome to midwifery. @GuerrillaCarl@ArturNadol7566@KenZeroHarm@YvetteCooperMP@andyburnham@JohnSwinney@AConstance23
I’m really not sure that portraying white working-class lads as racist far-right gammons for the last decade while using diversity policies to discriminate against them in virtually every institution is the best way of encouraging them to fight and die for Britain.
I am calling on various parts of the establishment to now ease off on their rhetoric about Restore Britain.
The Telegraph, Labour MPs, Farage, the Daily Mail, Lib Dems, the Guardian. Whoever.
It is putting our people at risk - directly leading to one being hospitalised for burns today, and endangering others.
Challenge our ideas, criticise our policies, debate us on our platform.
But to keep referring to our party as somehow 'nazi' or a whole other string of insults is evidently riling up these wild mobs.
Pushing for mass deportations is mainstream politics, backed by millions and millions of Brits. That is NOT 'nazism'.
Nobody, and I mean NOBODY, should be physically attacked in the street for peacefully campaigning.
This has to end.
Why is a Level 2 and 3 plumbing course free in the UK for an asylum seeker and some migrants, but not for me, who is English 🏴 and born here?
I am a 27-year-old British bloke who already has Level 1 plumbing and just wants to finish Levels 2 and 3 so I can work the trade and leave my Production Operative role for a real career.
Cost to me: £4,000–£6,000.
The same courses are free if you have refugee status here, free for an asylum seeker who has been here 6 months waiting on a decision, or refused and appealing for 6 months.
Also free immediately for several other statuses and if you are on a low income it seems.
Why is this country backwards? 🇬🇧
We did.
He wasn't looking at the road.
He was looking down.
But that still wasn't the strangest part.
The attorney paused the footage and zoomed in on the passenger seat.
Then asked:
“Didn't he testify that he was alone?”
He had.
But somebody else was clearly sitting beside him.
And once they figured out who that passenger was…
the entire lawsuit became about something very different."
Accepting these men into our country is a political choice, it always has been. Do NOT forget that. It is a choice.
A choice to put the wellbeing of young Afghan and Somali men ahead of British women and children.
A choice to allow those men to roam our communities, enabling them to harass and abuse local British residents. Rape. Murder. Sexual torture.
A choice.
A choice to house them in luxury accommodation when our own people starve and freeze.
A choice to grant them refugee status, allowing these parasites a comfortable life living off the British taxpayer.
A choice to give them NHS care, dental treatment, benefits, social housing.
It is all a choice.
It’s one that our rotten political class took - Labour, Conservative and Reform politicians made their choice.
They imported these men. They housed them, cared for them, fed them.
That’s their choice. They must live with the consequences. I will never forgive them. Nor should you. They made their choice.
I have made mine. I launched Restore Britain for ONE reason.
To put the British people first.
Not Afghans, or Iranians, or Africans.
British people.
And listen to me when I say this.
A Restore Britain Government will deport every last one.
Man, woman and child.
If they came illegally, we will remove them - with no apologies or fear. They will leave our home, and the boats will stop.
That I promise you.
We will take our country back.
Jason Arday’s death is tragic. But please spare us the sanctimonious complaints that he was merely an ‘obscure’ academic who was the victim of a racist witch-hunt. The probing and questioning and exposure were entirely legitimate.
Arday was plainly guilty of plagiarism. He had also made a series of fantastical claims about his life and career. He ended up being appointed as a professor at one of the world’s most august seats of learning – where his students, who had worked extremely hard to get there, were paying large fees for the privilege of being taught by him.
Far from being obscure, Arday had happily engaged with the media over many years, often repeating his false claims. He appeared on numerous TV shows and guest edited Radio 4’s flagship Today programme. He even carried the Olympic torch.
Moreover, he had secured a major publishing deal for his autobiography, which was set to be released in Britain and the US just as the scandal broke. By no measure was this man ‘obscure’.
When a fellow academic in Plymouth began to question his credentials, Arday (or someone close to him) made a complaint to the police. When a journalist from Times Higher Education started investigating, he was subjected to a police inquiry and also received a threatening letter from the leading libel solicitors, Carter Ruck.
Arday and those around him were clearly not averse to hounding others when they felt like it.
It’s very possible that Arday did not have sufficient support measures in place when he was finally exposed – but that’s on others. The investigation and questions amounted to legitimate journalistic inquiry.
This was never just about Arday’s fabulism. It was also about the increasingly controversial philosophy of DEI, the obsession of our political, corporate and educational institutions with pushing that philosophy, and how it might have led to someone with Arday’s subpar credentials being appointed in the first place.
These are all valid questions to ask – and, by asking them, journalists are simply doing their jobs.
@BarkJack_ If first child’s birth was monitored why were there no doctors signatures on the Buckingham Palace announcement , like other Royal births. ?
If an adult feels they can only exist comfortably and authentically in this world by dressing in the opposite sex's clothes, having surgeries and taking hormones, or in adopting one of the many gender labels, I wish them safety, happiness and health, as long as they're not harming anyone else. You, however, seem to think that for a trans-identified man to be 'comfortable' and 'authentic', everyone in the vicinity must abandon their freedom of speech and belief to accommodate his 'identity'.
Women are not validation props, comfort blankets or support animals. We aren't a rest home for men who don't like being men. If a person's happiness and self-esteem resides entirely on whether or not they can compel everyone around them to lie, whether out of fear or pity, I would respectfully suggest they are unlikely to have a very comfortable life, and are about as far from being 'authentic' as it is possible to be.
We are in a very dark place. The football World Cup is on & this council has spent tax payers money going to court to make it illegal to fly Our flag on Our streets.
Starmer did not shed a tear for the girls in Southport
He did not shed a tear for Wayne Broadhurst or Rhiannon Whyte.
He did not shed a tear for the women attacked by migrants he brought here.
He did not shed a tear for Henry Nowak.
In the end he only shed a tear for himself.
Britain had a moment of silence for George Floyd. Our politicians kneeled en masse to show their outrage at his killing. "I can't breathe" became a slogan.
George Floyd died on the other side of the world. He wasn't British.
Henry Nowak *was* British and his treatment by the police was shocking and negligent in the extreme. Yet there is no minute of silence. There is no coordinated public campaign. There is no kneeling at sporting events.
And we all know why.
During the summer of BLM, some people said "All Lives Matter". This was treated as the highest form of racism and anyone who said this was immediately cancelled. Why? Because the people in charge don't actually think all lives matter in the same way.
They have created a racial hierarchy of victimhood where a career criminal who died through mistreatment by police in a foreign country with 0 evidence of racism like George Floyd is automatically sanctified because of the colour of his skin.
And Henry Nowak, a British man, one of ours, is automatically dismissed and ignored because of the colour of his.
This is the ugly fruit of so-called "anti-racism", an obsession with race that has created a two-tier society which treats people differently because of the colour of their skin.
This needs to stop.
Folks Many have commented on the Murder of Henry Nowak without knowing the Full Facts; Police arrived on blue & twos to a very fast moving & confusing situation & were greeted with a False Allegation & acted on that Lie; hindsight is a gift none of us have & certainly not the police;
It’s right & appropriate that @HantsPolice responded with the full facts when they could & as were seen by the responding officers; we live in a world of the Blame game; often with minimum facts or accurate information some immediately apportion blame;
@HantsPolice were unable to respond to the criticism during a live criminal trial due to the Sub-judicial law; ie you cannot comment about a trial in any negative way when it’s ongoing trial; so nothing was being hidden as legally they could not respond in anyway; despite the media reporting on the case daily which they are entitled on doing so on evidence given in an ongoing case; ie only the facts given in open court;
Put yourself in the shoes of those responding officers turning up at a chaotic scene with someone shouting allegations (now known as lies) & not being aware that a man had been stabbed; they were probably acting on instinct as they tried to fathom what had actually happened;
Have the public got the right to ask questions of this incident? absolutely as the police are accountable to the public for any actions that they take be they rightly wrongly or in an honest belief that they were acting in trying to protect the public & making split second decisions with little to no information all of these questions & superstitions will now want & need answers;
The suspect here was Not the victim but in fact the Individual who lied to the police who clearly did not know that that was the case in the initial seconds that they arrived; they were deceived;
What was the Immediate concern of the officers? that there had been a racial attack? & if so was that their over riding concern? Could they have dealt with this matter differently? & if so how? These are the type of questions the @policeconduct will now Independently investigate;
Those wishing to see the Officers BWC Footage will be disappointed at this stage as that is with the @policeconduct & that is right we cannot have the Social Media Jury giving their verdicts on just a short video clip without reading & hearing from all of the witnesses in this matter;
The attending officers have been subject of a huge amount of abuse & condemnation & that should be reserved until we know the full facts of this matter as the dreadful headlines probably haven’t told the True Story just the salacious condemning parts;
When the public are told of true facts probably by @policeconduct then that’s the time for comments & views when all the true facts & circumstances are known;
The person we should all be condemning is the Murderer; the Lier along with his mother who took the knife the Murderer used in this monstrous & pointless killing & hid it in her house;
He has been convicted of Murder & his Mother of assisting an offender & I hope that they each receive very long & appropriate sentences;
I also saw many negative comments of when the judge gave the Jury his directions; he gave them the offence of Murder or Manslaughter to consider; I can tell you that alongside every Murder charge will also be the alternative charge of Manslaughter; the first requires an Intent to Murder & the other is a Killing without Intent!
The Jury in the end absolutely got the verdict right; that of Murder where a fixed term of Imprisonment is passed & I’d suggest that will be in the region of 23/26yrs as the aggravating factors are high & the mitigating factors are low in this case in my opinion!
The Murderer will have to serve the entire sentence that is passed called a Tariff as there is no early release when a person is convicted of a murder!
I hope my overview helps put this case into some sort of perspective!
Thanks & God Bless Mr Henry Nowak & his Family😞
A foreign billionaire just did the job the entire British press wouldn't.
@elonmusk asked the question every newsroom in this country should have been screaming for months. Who are the officers that handcuffed a dying boy and let him bleed out in the street? Who are they, and why are they still in a job?
Not the BBC. Not Sky. Not GB News. A bloke in Texas with no stake in this country.
They had the story. They let it die. He picked it back up, called it unconscionable, and offered to fund a wrongful death lawsuit.
The answer to his question? Silence. Still.
This is Henry Nowak. First year student. Walking home from a night out with his football team. A wounded teenager telling officers he couldn't breathe, and the response was handcuffs, not an ambulance.
A boy dies like this on a British street and it should never have left the front page. It should have been the reckoning that didn't stop until someone answered for it. Instead it took a man who owes us nothing to drag it back into the light.
Not one officer named. Not one suspended. The watchdog is investigating now, and only now, because the pressure came from a website and not a single news desk in this country.
Ordinary people never needed permission to care. They raised over £40,000 for Henry at a charity football match in his memory. That is the Britain that still has a pulse. The one that doesn't wait to be told who's allowed to matter.
When the richest man on earth has to do your journalism for you, what exactly is the British press for?
So let me ask you the question they wouldn't. Did you see Henry's name on the news? Or did you have to find it here?
Henry Nowak. 18 years old. Walking home. He should have made it.