Voters may not recall correlation between policies and outcomes
Political narratives can exploit that through plausible narratives that reattribute outcomes to steal credit & shift blame
But with new govt is in office, narrative fades to reality and voters penalize incumbent
Big picture: politics is not only a competition over which policies work. When causality is hard, it is also a competition over plausible narratives. That can weaken the role of true policy quality.
Very happy that my paper with @frbilo found a wonderful home.
This was our second-year paper, and in many ways where research started for us: many conversations, whiteboards, arguments about politics and narratives, some frustration, and lots of fun.
What is it about? 👇
We also study analogy-based narratives, truth-telling preferences, and heterogeneous voter feedback.
These extensions can constrain persuasion, restore an edge for the better policy, or backfire by deterring the better politician from playing dirty.
@mtt_brs Yes, there is an old finding that incumbents lose consensus on average (Paldam, 1986), and this is getting larger over time (checked data myself as motivation for some work). We have a take on a possible why in a paper (https://t.co/Ba1tHqNFXb) and in another work in progress.
@jburnmurdoch Our take on (one of the) why. When politicians compete on claiming who is the best, incumbents face a natural disadvantage: they have to take some blame for what goes bad, while challengers are unconstrained in claiming they could do much better.
Paper: https://t.co/Ba1tHqNFXb
Recently published paper in the @JPubEcon :
"The Limits of Social Recognition: Experimental Evidence from Blood Donors"
Vol 231 (Mar 2024)
by Lorenz Goette (@LorenzGoette , @NUSResearch ) & Egon Tripodi (@EgonTripodi , @thehertieschool )
https://t.co/p7d6k6CCXo
📣 (Please RT)
@LorenzGoette
and I are hiring a predoc, for 1-2 years. Dive into research, learn the tools of modern experimental work and get ready for grad school applications. To apply: https://t.co/ls37NBMOWD
@econ_ra
1/4
📣 (Please RT) @LorenzGoette and I are hiring a predoc, for 1-2 years, to support our experimental agenda. Dive into research, learn the tools of modern experimental work and get ready for grad school applications. Link to application: https://t.co/qt8El0Tyk8 @econ_ra 1/4
We are incredibly excited to kick off a three-day Ph.D. course on Subjective Beliefs, Attention, and Economic Behavior @CEBI_UCPH in Copenhagen. We have an amazing group of Ph.D. students from all over the world attending the course! @cp_roth @Ingar30@SettSonja@JoWohlfart
Three truths about social media platforms, no matter who owns them.
Truth 1: Moderation is required or trolls destroy the platform. Further, without temporary bans or content removal to educate first time offenders on the guidelines they violated, more people become trolls.
V excited to release a new paper with @LorenzGoette, after so many years working on it!
Does social recognition promote good citizenship?
We study this question in 🇮🇹 with repeat blood donors.
📃 https://t.co/DNfyMxDSDu
🧵Hear me out: 1/12
Teams like @OESatGSA @BIT_Americas run 100s of nudge RCTs to improve govt. New paper by @sdellavi@ElizabethLinos show significant +ve effects of these low-cost nudges across all trials. But why is effect size smaller than in academic papers? Learn more...https://t.co/jl9651Njs9