@peakfomo@realEstateTrent From what I’ve seen: providers of alternative weight loss services (both traditional & untraditional), law firms assessing the likely success of a lawsuit (SOP for virtually any new popular drug), content providers who benefit from convincing people they have superior knowledge…
@peakfomo@realEstateTrent Consider who propounds “Ozempic personality” and the $ benefits they gain from doing so. Dive deeper and you’ll learn that many users report improved mood and mood stability.
@CuriousLuke93x@Docs_Delphi Yep. Also, judicial restraint instructs judges to rule on the narrowest grounds that will resolve the dispute. The issues are presented in that order (narrowest to broadest).
@Luckydog617@BoozeyBeauty Judge Casper is presiding over US v Matthew Farwell. She also signed the protective order re distribution of federal grand jury materials in KR’s trials. So she’s at least somewhat familiar with this case.
@carriecherry75@andykopsa Cannone *was* terrible, esp during the second trial-very biased, mean, nasty, petty etc. But for all that, still just a person in a robe, not the roiling pit of evil draped with black fabric that is Gull.
@EveTrueCrime @oksanka_luky Obviously I don’t know what actually happened. Legally, sworn allegations are “proof” & judge decides whether they’re credible and meet the legal standard (incl intent). On their face (truth is assumed), the allegations appear to meet the legal standard under the Utah statute.
@oksanka_luky @EveTrueCrime This whole thing feels icky. I don’t like LM (🤮 by her take on RA), but contacting her hub’s employer & LM’s own prof contacts is a bridge too far for me. And you can’t violate an RO, even if you dispute that it was properly obtained. I feel like no one is addressing that.
@brendasbullshit@IUHabeas@Chelsea_Lauren@Wienekelo If attys miss a filing deadline in a crim case-esp a murder case w/ life in prison-a court will likely admonish the attorneys & not penalize the defendant . If the def can’t appeal because of attys’ actions, def has a strong arg for a new appeal bc his attys were ineffective.
@jan_jsz@LawyerYouKnow They elicited one point; no stapled cash at Donna’s, casting doubt on Katie’s testimony about DA & HA bringing cash to Charlie . It’s helpful, especially in combo with Katie’s unreliability. But the rest? No clue.
@redbeansnrice99 I reread multiple times and came to the conclusion that your responses lack clarity and you contradict yourself. The one thing that’s clear is that you’re a dick.
@ChrisCash702@redbeansnrice99@meghanncuniff It doesn’t have to be is my point. I hate the hypocrisy of claiming punishment is one thing (loss of liberty), when it’s actually another (violent assaults). If the people want physical punishment, we can lawfully implement it. It actually might be more of a deterrent.
@redbeansnrice99@meghanncuniff The legal consequence under our current system of justice is deprivation of liberty. That’s what our society agreed to. If you think rape or other violence is an appropriate punishment, write to your legislators and lobby for it.
@ItsMissShorty@LawTubeSean Absolutely they deserve the grace to grieve, and they can say whatever they like outside of court. But in open court during a judicial proceeding, the statements were improper.