The top AI agencies are closing $20Kā$50K+ deals
While youāre still explaining why $1,000 isnāt expensive.
Hereās what theyāre doing differently:
They donāt sell tools. They sell the cost of the problem.
Instead of saying: āweāll build an automationā
They say: āthis issue is costing you $8ā10K every month - we fix it in 30 days.ā
They donāt pitch features. They map money leaks.
When a client clearly sees theyāre losing $100K a year, a $20K system stops feeling expensive.
It feels obvious.
They also donāt build tiny one-offs.
They build systems that touch revenue, ops, or retention.
And they donāt argue price.
They show:
ā whatās broken
ā how long it takes to fix
ā what changes after
Thatās why thereās no negotiation.
Youāre not losing deals because you charge too much.
Youāre losing deals because youāre pricing the tool, not the outcome.
Stop selling automation.
Start selling what the business gets back.
Thatās when $20K stops being a scary number.
My leads agree to pay me six figures
before I build anything for them.
If your leads donāt trust you, hereās what youāre doing wrong.
Most people think trust comes after delivery.
It doesnāt.
Trust is built before the build, during discovery.
If your leads hesitate, ghost, or keep āthinking about it,ā
itās usually because youāre asking them to trust your skills
instead of showing them you understand their business.
Spend 3 hours finding the hidden money in a business
and theyāll ask you to build the solution.
Hereās how I approach discovery now:
1ļøā£ Scan the entire operation
Sales, ops, support, finance.
Anywhere time or money leaks.
2ļøā£ Put real numbers on the pain
Not āthis is inefficientā -
āThis is costing you ~$8K a month.ā
3ļøā£ Map where AI actually fits
Only where it removes friction or increases output.
No random automations.
4ļøā£ Show the before ā after
What breaks today.
What changes once the system is live.
5ļøā£ Lay out a clear roadmap
What gets built first.
What comes next.
How long each step takes.
When you do this right, selling gets easy.
Stop guessing what to build.
Run discovery that proves your value before you touch a workflow.
Thatās how you get hired to build.
I uninstalled the most powerful AI Iāve ever used.
Not because it failed,
because it worked too well.
Clawdbot isnāt a chatbot.
Itās a 24/7 digital employee.
What makes it different:
ā It never forgets (permanent memory)
ā You text it on Telegram/WhatsApp
ā It actually uses your apps (Gmail, Notion, Drive)
ā It runs nonstop on its own server
I made a dead-simple guide:
ā 3-step setup
ā $1,500 in free credits
ā runs for $0
Reply āClawdbotā and Iāll send it.
I went from charging $200 per project to $20,000+ systems as an AI agency founder.
Here are the shifts that actually mattered:
ā I stopped selling tasks No more ābuild a botā or āset up automation. ā
I sold outcomes the business cared about.
ā I learned one industry deeply - How they make money. Where things break.
What costs them time every day.
ā I built systems, not one-offs
One solution that fixed multiple problems at once instead of 10 tiny automations.
ā I priced on impact, not hours
When the system touched revenue or ops,price stopped being the main objection.
Thatās how one client went from $5K ā $15K ā $130K.
Same skills. Same tools. Different positioning.
Generalists compete on price.
Specialists get paid for clarity.
I f youāre stuck doing low-ticket work, donāt learn another tool.
Pick one industry.
Go deep enough that they canāt replace you.
My team thought I was insane for doing this
But I'd once turned down an offer worth $21,300 from a client.
And it was one of the best business decisions Iād ever made. Hereās why-
There are clients who will drain you more than they help you grow, and Iāve realised the signs late.
Today, I wonāt work with these 5 types of clients, even if they offer $50K+/month.
Learned this the hard way.
1. āAI will just learn on its own, right?ā
No. Testing is not self-learning. If expectations are broken on day one, the project is dead.
2. āCan you build a quick custom demo first?ā
Thereās always one more feature. They never buy. Thatās why I stopped free demos and take 50% upfront.
3. āWe need 100% accuracy.ā
In 2026, thatās not how AI works. I promise ~85% and aim for 90%.
Overpromising creates enemies.
4. Vague scope, high urgency.
They forget integrations, want daily updates, and reply late when you need feedback.
5. No respect for contracts.
Every time I ignored this, delivery time doubled.
High-paying doesnāt mean high-quality.
Alignment beats revenue, every time.
I turned a $300 client into an $11K+/month retainer.
Hereās the entire process:
They came in with:
- One small problem
- One $5K project
Most agencies would deliver, invoice, and move on.
Thatās where growth dies.
What I did instead:
ā Treated the first project as trust-building
ā Under-promised, over-delivered
ā Recorded every call and listened carefully
ā Noted every off-hand complaint
Over time they revealed:
Broken internal ops
No CRM No onboarding
No growth systems
I didnāt pitch tools.
I mapped outcomes and the cost of doing nothing.
Small projects scale when you sell systems, not features.
I have worked with clients who paid as less as $200 and as high as $132K+
And all the clients who paid high without insane negotiation, had one thing in common-
They donāt care how confident you sound.
They donāt care how smart your AI is.
They care about clarity:
What problem are you solving?
How does it make or save them money?
Why should they trust you?
If you want to hit $20K+/month consistently in 2026,
you donāt need more leads.
You need to make the value obvious before the proposal.
Thatās exactly what I teach inside my Skool community,
The systems, the strategies, and the actual processes that helped me scale.
Comment āScaleā and Iāll send you the link.
Why most AI agencies never pass $5K/month (and itās NOT about skill)
After helping 10+ AI agency owners grow past $10K/month, I noticed one big pattern:
Theyāre not failing because theyāre bad at AI.
Theyāre failing because theyāre playing the wrong game.
Iāve been there too, chasing projects, begging for clients, staying busy but broke.
Hereās the truth most people miss:
If clients pay your competitors 3Ć more than you,
it doesnāt mean your work is worse.
It means youāre making these mistakes š
Common mistakes keeping agencies stuck:
>> Selling āautomationsā instead of fixing money problems
>> Taking any client with a budget instead of decision-makers
>> Writing long proposals instead of showing clear results
>> Asking clients to ātrust youā instead of proving value
>> Charging for time instead of business impact
>> Avoiding hard conversations with bad-fit clients
>> Letting clients control the project
Dropping the price at the end and hoping it works
Staying busy without actually scaling
None of this is about talent.
Itās about positioning.
One of my clients closed $42,000 with an email setup we built
But 99% of cold email systems are cringe
It's completely done by a $37 AI powered tool
And I am sharing the complete blueprint with you for FREE today.
This is how this cold-email setup brought deals for me and my clients:
ā 1,000 emails sent daily
ā ~50% open rate
ā ~50 replies
ā 5-7 demos booked
ā 1-2 closed deals weekly
Want the exact playbook? Comment INSTANTLY and Iāll send you my exact templates and sequences to you.
I built a Zillow Property Analysis System that can add an extra $100K to real estate firms
Hereās what this system adds money to your account-
You define the type of property youāre looking for, the system scans Zillow for matching listings:
ā It evaluates the numbers to filter out non-viable deals
ā It ranks the strongest opportunities
ā It generates a clean, client-ready property report
ā It delivers the report automatically
Even if you close one extra deal per month You get $90Kā$180K extra per year.
Want the full system?
1ļøā£ Like this post
2ļøā£ Comment āZILLOWā Iāll send you the full breakdown.
15 minutes before a discovery call, I know more about the prospect than most of their employees.
Thatās why my conversion rate is consistently high.
Hereās the mistake I see founders make over and over again:
They call it āresearch,ā but itās really guessing.
They rely on ChatGPT. It hallucinates and makes them sound generic.
They rely on Google. It buries the signal under noise.
So they show up to calls curious, but unprepared.
And curiosity doesnāt close deals. Context does.
So, hereās what I do instead (15 minutes, every call):
⢠I use perplexity for research
⢠Search the prospectās name + company
⢠Pull their recent LinkedIn posts
⢠Scan news articles & funding updates
⢠Check recent hires & role gaps
⢠Look at competitor moves in their space
I applied it for a healthcare prospect.
I found a LinkedIn post the CEO wrote three months earlier about staffing challenges.
I didnāt āpitchā it. I referenced it naturally during the conversation.
The tone changed immediately. Thatās what preparation does. It builds credibility before you ever explain your offer.
My proposals donāt persuade. They feel like I get them like no one else.
Deep research isnāt optional anymore.
This is CRAZY- you can get a 40% open rate with just an AI avatarā¦
One of my clients closed a five-figure deal using nothing but this AI avatar.
We used HeyGen to create short, prospect-specific videos that felt like they were recorded just for them.
-> Name
-> Company
-> Pain point
All addressed directly in a 30-second clip. People donāt ignore that. They click it immediately.
I literally saw people charging $2000+ for this
But if you want the full workflow we used, including the avatar setup, outreach structure, and the exact personalization angle.
Comment āHeyGenā and Iāll send it over for FREE
2 years ago, I was busy every single day, But it didnāt give me any results and burnt me out.
Turns out, most people donāt fail for lack of effort.
They fail by focusing on the wrong things.
If youāre working harder every single day without having any clarityā¦
You will burn out and feel like turning over the table.
I felt the same, thatās why Iād paused for a while and started:
⢠Defining the real problem first
⢠Designing systems before scaling effort
⢠Choosing ONE direction
⢠Removing chaos before adding speed
Now, Iād rather move slow with clarity, than fast & lost.
I closed 8 out of 10 discovery calls with this sales prompt
$100K+ in revenue & 80% closing rate
I designed this after closing 45+ clients in the last 28 months.
And this one prompt alone has helped:
Hit $80K month recently
Turn cold leads into warm buyers in minutes
Remove their doubt about our what we offer
ā Comment āPrompt" and I'll send it to you for FREE.
I thought more clients meant making more money.
But it RUINED my business and kept me STUCK!!!
In 2023, 10-15 projects barely made me $3k-$7K
In 2024, just 2 clients made me $200,000+
And I didnāt have to work sleepless nights to scale,
What I did is dumbly simple -
I switched to:
Vertical specialization from generic industries
AI Growth Infrastructures instead of quick automations.
Hereās what actually scales your revenue:
ā Solve bigger problems, not more tiny tasks
ā Build long-term systems, not one-off automations
ā Work with one specific vertical, not āanyone who needs AIā
Going broad kept me poor (I was literally tugging at my hairs)
Going deep changed everything. (I started solving burning problems)
You donāt need more clients.
You need the right clients in the right niche.
One aligned vertical can change your entire trajectory.
This workflow turns any article link into a ready-to-post video in minutes.
So I documented the system and Iām sharing it FREE.
How it works:
ā Pick an avatar + voice
ā Paste an article link
ā It pulls key points
ā Writes a short social video script
ā Creates a scrolling background
ā Combines everything into one video
ā Waits till itās ready
ā Emails you the final video
No camera. No editing.
This cut my content creation time by 80%.
Want the Article-to-Video system?
š Comment āVIDEOā
Iāll send the full breakdown.
Last year, we hit an $80K cash month,
$100K in revenue generated - but I felt blank.
This was the milestone Iād been chasing for 18 months.
The FINALLY "we made it" number.
You'd think I'd be celebrating, or at least taking some days off to enjoy.
But honestly? I just stared at the dashboard and felt... nothing.
I felt a weird kind of exhaustion.
Success feels empty if youāve sacrificed your own balance to reach it.
Entrepreneurs often expect that ānext milestoneā to finally give them peace, only to realize burnout has stolen the celebration.
Iād burned out months before. Said yes to too much. Slept less, worked more.
And when the numbers showed up? It all felt like a blur.
Thatās when I realized that growth isnāt just about bigger revenue.
Itās:
ā Building better systems
ā Choosing better habits
ā Running at better energy
Now, ask myself these three questions to measure success:
Am I working with intention?
Are my systems running without me?
Can I actually take a day off, guilt free?
The $80K month was just a number. Finding balance, thatās the real win.
How about you?
What milestone didnāt feel the way you thought it would?
I went from $0 to $1,000,000+ selling AI infrastructures in 18 months.
hereās the exact 17-step system I followed:
-> Picked one vertical that had real operational pain (not āsomeone who was interested in AI,ā but actually bleeding time & money)
-> Talked to 10-30 founders in that vertical to understand their bottlenecks before writing a single line of automation
-> Listed the top 10 problems they kept repeating
chose the one problem that caused the biggest daily chaos -usually intake, follow-ups, or internal workflow gaps
-> Built a small working prototype in 48 hours (it didnāt have to be pretty, just functional enough to show the outcome)
-> used that prototype instead of proposals- demos sell faster than descriptions
-> made a simple offer: āwe fix one department first, then scale the system across your businessā
-> priced the first phase based on impact, not hours (my close rate doubled overnight)
-> I broke projects into clear phases so clients understood exactly what we were building and why.
-> documented everything - broken parts, repeated issues, client feedback - and turned it into an internal playbook
-> used that playbook to rebuild faster each time (what took 3 weeks now takes 4 days)
-> upsold naturally by solving the next bottleneck the system exposed
-> asked happy clients for referrals inside the same vertical (warm intros gave me easiest wins)
-> built a second infrastructure using all the lessons from the first - it closed in a fraction of the time
-> turned my entire process into a āGrowth Infrastructure Frameworkā so every new client followed the same path
-> kept improving the system publicly - shared case studies, failures, screenshots, numbers
-> repeated this until I had multiple infrastructures running across a few high-value verticals
Still spending 6+ hours on product launches? We created this in 60 seconds.
We built an automation workflow that reads product images, understands the product, and generates a complete launch package.
The system handles:
ā Multi-image analysis (front, back, side)
ā Agent-based strategy + copy + SEO
ā VEO 3.1 video generation via
ā Live processing + public URLs from Supabase
Comment āShopifyā and I will share the complete system with you