Thanks @RAS_Soc for recognizing our work with the Subedi Prize! Congratulations to my co-authors @JeevanBani30804@manojsuji@CDWTibet Bina Khapunghang Limbu, Nabin Rawal, and Prakash Chandra Subedi. Winning article on #Nepal#reconstruction is Open Access https://t.co/wMEIfbnZqh
SINHAS 29(2) is now available for reading at Martin Chautari library and for purchase from the shop of our publisher Mandala Book Point in Jamal, Kantipath, Kathmandu.
TOC:
https://t.co/38eRLk1JgH
Coming March 6! Omer Aijazi, "Atmospheric Violence: Disaster and Repair in Kashmir" 10 AM PST, on Zoom. Register here: https://t.co/NDNbtJXOLH @DollyKikon @UCSCTHI
The problem with liberalism is that it rests on a fundamental contradiction that cannot be resolved. It will always fail, it will always collapse, and this explains everything about our current moment.
Liberals try to hold two commitments at once: on the one hand, they are firmly committed to capitalism; on the other, they express support for principles like human rights, democracy, equality, freedom of speech, environment and the rule of law. This duality is the core of liberalism.
But there's a problem. Capital accumulation requires cheapening labour and nature. This eventually comes into direct conflict with principles like rights and equality. And whenever this conflict appears, the liberal ruling class sides with capital, abandons their lofty principles, and throws workers and nature under the bus. Every. Single. Time.
This results in flagrant displays of hypocrisy. They run on nice-sounding platforms but end up either betraying their promises or actively working against their stated values. They'll slash public services, bail out banks, imprison journalists, beat up students, expand fracking, coup democratically elected leaders in the global South, bomb liberation movements, fund a genocide - they'll even trash international law itself - anything that's needed to maintain the conditions for capital accumulation.
At most, they may try to negotiate mediocre compromises, a few social policies here and there - some abortion rights, a tiny increase in the minimum wage - but nothing that might pose any serious threat to capital accumulation. Thus the soul-crushing slowness of liberal incrementalism. Ultimately they are unwilling to take any of the obvious steps that would actually resolve our urgent social and ecological crises.
This is why nobody trusts liberal politicians. This is why they come across as so fantastically insincere, and even sneering. This is why they feel so spineless and *empty*.
The center cannot hold. Liberalism will always collapse, inevitably handing power to fascists, and this is not acceptable. There is only one way to overcome this deadly impasse, and that is to mobilize a socialist alternative. A political movement that can unite the working-classes, overcome capitalism, deliver real economic democracy, and enable us to achieve rapid progress toward social and ecological goals.
Congratulations to @aslizeng, who has won the Ruth Benedict Prize from @QueerAnthro for her book "Violent Intimacies," and to Naisargi N. Davé, whose book "Indifference" received honorable mention.
https://t.co/9RFJzZmitY
We are very pleased to announce the publication of our latest issue:
Vol. 43 No. 2 (2024): Special Section - Himalayan Flashes: Regional Ethnography in Short Form
https://t.co/V3K3HlvMk9