Brian Anslinger

Local TV News expat. Married to an Oregon Duck. Bleeds Dodger Blue. Teaches about UFOs/UAPS. Retweets & Likes are not endorsements. Opinions are my own. #UAPx

[André Carson @RepAndreCarson]

I chaired the first open hearing on UAPs—Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena—4 years ago. At the time, UAPs were disregarded as science fiction. Today, some of the nation’s leading experts in policy, research, and science are engaged in serious conversations about transparency and oversight.

Thank you to the @disclosurefound for hosting this important gathering.

[Garry P. Nolan @GarryPNolan]

Why do we need a UAP Scientific Advisory Board?

As has been widely reported, the US government has asked Professor Avi Loeb, of the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University (see the main announcement at the end of this posting), to create a UAP Advisory Council. The members of this advisory group span a range of disciplines from astronomy, psychology, physics, biology, data analytics, psychology, entrepreneurs, and more. I am thrilled to have been invited alongside a notable list of scientists, academics, entrepreneurs, and others.

What follows are my personal thoughts and are not any official position of the UAP Advisory Council. Dr. Loeb has already elaborated on the formation of this Council, along with his views through postings on his blog and in public interviews.

Importantly, no one on the Council has been asked to sign any non-disclosure agreements. We are told that we are free to discuss matters that come before the Board, but without attribution of the source (Chatham House rules). By the same token, I am not obligated to answer any questions either. I plan to treat this effort like I do my day job in cancer immunology—not talking publicly about results until I am sure the answer is as close to correct as I can determine.

So, how did this Advisory Council come to be? Well, one answer is simple—through the dedicated action of thousands of individuals across decades, the coming forward of credible military and government officials in public testimony (sometimes under oath), the work of members of Congress and the Senate, along with testimonials of public witnesses, and much more.

Collectively, those actions have led to the extraordinary and courageous decision by President Donald J. Trump and his administration to release to the public US government-owned UAP-related files and information as vetted by a UAP Governance Board and other government agencies. As publicly announced, our group will report to the UAP Governing Board, which is under the direction of the Executive Branch.

Many people have openly wondered, “Why create a new Board when elements of the government or even commercial institutions already (allegedly) know the answer?” The UAP Advisory Council doesn't have any funding, and we don’t have subpoena power. We are all volunteers. We advise. Given that, there are some straightforward answers to the criticisms and commentary I have seen.

First, appreciate that the complexity of what UAP might represent is not definable in a single technological or cultural framework. It is so complex that even I, who have been steeped in the matter for over 15 years, have a hard time encompassing the breadth of explanations from “it’s real, and it’s here” to “it’s all misidentification”. My mind spins trying to make sense of it all.

What is clear is that the data released so far is not enough. The anecdotes are not enough. Sure, interesting videos, but where’s the metadata? What are the parameters of how the data was collected? Why are there extreme redactions of files and data? Why the incredible pushback? Where are the alleged retrieved technologies? There’s simply not enough to convince me when I put on my serious scientist’s hat.

Yet what I do know is that the question of what it might be will not go away while the data remains locked up. The answers to what any data might mean will require a comprehensive effort across disciplines that expand well beyond “nuts and bolts” science. Hence, the broad makeup of the team that comprises the UAP Advisory Council. Every person on the Board is, I believe, devoted to taking a logical and deeply skeptical approach to this matter. We will let the data guide us and cross-check each other.

For me, despite my widely known bias that I think there’s something deeper to the matter than misidentification, I remain like any scientist a trained sceptic at heart. I am terrified of making a mistake, but I’ve yet to reach a formal conclusion despite my public musings. I can believe a thing might be true, but as a scientist, I must believe enough in the possibility of an idea being true to justify my time and effort to prove it to myself— and more so to prove it to colleagues or the lay public.

There is data that, when contextualized as a hypothesis, becomes evidence that invites us to wonder whether the answer to “Are We Alone?” might be sitting right in front of us, but we choose to ignore it or let others tell us it should be ignored. Remember, data is only evidence towards supporting a conclusion when you pose a question (hypothesis) around what the data means. But evidence is not a conclusion. Evidence is what you put in front of a jury, where the data has been sufficiently scrubbed of doubt to allow one to decide what it means.

So, back to “Why do we need a UAP Scientific Advisory Board?” Well, we all want objective, and even subjective, expertise to interpret whatever data comes our way. Even if tomorrow a saucer landed in Times Square, we would still need a swath of expertise to interpret what opens the door, how it got here, and what might be the intent. Better to be prepared, in my opinion.

We obviously risk that this is a misdirection from some essential truth or that we might be being used in some elaborate disinformation campaign. We are also aware that we might be in for the possibility that there is simply nothing there but elaborate stories and misidentifications.

But I can tell you this—the risk is worth it. We have come further than ever before to open the door (or Pandora’s Box) to a potentially incredible opportunity. “Are we alone?” might be answered as “We are one of many.” Coming to know what others might have already learned about the nature of reality is, for me, well worth the effort to ask the question.

One way or the other, I believe humanity can handle the answer.
https://t.co/QZEUu6AZAa

[Los Angeles Dodgers @Dodgers]

2,500 reasons why Freddie Freeman is good at baseball.

[Lue Elizondo @LueElizondo]

Looking forward to seeing you tomorrow night Portland alongside NASA’s very own Mike Gold. Tickets available at the Aladdin Theaters website here: https://t.co/ahPH0RppL4

[Brian Anslinger @ManSlinger]

Looking for plans Sunday night? @LueElizondo will be in Portland, OR to discuss UAP with former NASA official Mike Gold at Aladdin Theater: https://t.co/7u5GIzjCaE

[Rep. Eric Burlison @RepEricBurlison]

My letter requires MITRE to tell Congress what it knows, what it holds, what it has held, what it has transferred, what it has destroyed or was directed to destroy, and which federal sponsors or classification authorities control any responsive records.

Read more 👇

[Brian Anslinger @ManSlinger]

@ChadMoriyama

[George Knapp @g_knapp]

On Friday, a few hours after the latest UFO/UAP release, we spoke with Lue Elizondo to get his take--the good, the bad, the ugly aspects of this odd process and where it might lead. https://t.co/3VGI7RVXiJ

[wow @wow36932525]

#UFOx #UFOtwitter #UAP #NHI

Mystery Wire with George Knapp, Ron Futrell
& Lue Elizondo (Fri May 22, 2026).

"Aircraft, bodies of dead pilots
do you see that anywhere in
the future of releases?"

Full source:
https://t.co/VAeaMu2LfX

[Eric Burlison @EricBurlison]

IMHO this is the most important record released today.

https://t.co/qHJQlfq1HE

[That UFO Podcast @ufouapam]

Highlights for me of the 50 videos in Release 2.0 from https://t.co/MspzmcRPod

This is a small sample of the videos i consider the more interesting.

Feel free to use and share

[Ryan Graves @uncertainvector]

The @DeptofWar has released the next tranche of UAP files.

[George Knapp @g_knapp]

NSA Releases Hundreds of Pages of Formerly Top Secret UMBRA UAP Records After Disclosure Foundation FOIA Appeal | Disclosure Foundation https://t.co/CdrThBuqfx

[Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell @JeremyCorbell]

Um… I’m not sure what to say about this. This is deeply disturbing. @G_Knapp and I put our best foot forward with the D.I.G. 🛸

I think y’all will learn a lot more about this VERY soon - publicly.

Sounds like James here should call the G-Man and me ☎️👀

[UAPWixy @UAPWixy]

🚨"Lue, you've seen the video's that haven't been yet really been released"- @rosscoulthart

"Absolutely & they'll blow your mind!- @LueElizondo

"And there is a hell of a lot, you & I know both know that there are much, much more impressive videos then we are seeing.."- Ross

"There's absolutely no question about it!"-Lue

H/T: @NewsNation

[Lynda TH7 @Dragonflynda]

This is my disclosure day.

I learned more about consciousness through prayer than anything else, through any talks, any books, any one discussing entanglement or otherwise. Distances and times mean nothing. Remote viewing has nothing on such experiences through prayer. Healings etc.

I once told someone in response about politics, UFO talk etc, that none of that is my mission here. I integrate a lot in my posts.

Prayer is my mission. I might never tell someone I’m praying for their healing, I might post a 🙏💫 etc and nothing more, I might like a post. You don’t know the depth of prayer going for you - and that is for “enemies” and friends, knowns and unknown. That is my mission.

[Joe Murgia @TheUfoJoe]

This one is pretty cool!

(UNDISCLOSED LOCATION)
01.01.2024

Courtesy Video

All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office

The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 39 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation.

[Department of War 🇺🇸 @DeptofWar]

https://t.co/rzCVvUU3mu

[Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell @JeremyCorbell]

Just now... sources in the White House as well as Congressional members tell me and @G_Knapp that the Presidential UFO file release will begin tomorrow.

We are told it will be slow and steady at first. Nothing shocking initially. Let's see where this goes! This is VERY encouraging - that this administration is following through. More data means more leverage for those of us fighting for UAP transparency.

SLEEPING DOG exists because our government chose silence over transparency - that might be changing.

https://t.co/k6QZirwsVc

[Ryan Graves @uncertainvector]

Seems like things are about to get more interesting.