Desde los líderes mundiales hasta las principales economías, la atención está fija en nuestra nación no solo por nuestros recursos, sino por nuestra soberanía, estabilidad y futuro. Guyana se encuentra en un momento decisivo en la historia.
From global leaders to major economies, attention is fixed on our nation not just for our resources, but for our sovereignty, stability, and future. Guyana stands at a defining moment in history.
Venezuela debería sentirse orgullosa de su país, no intimidar a uno más pequeño por territorio. Las disputas se resuelven con respeto y derecho internacional. Respeten la decisión de la Corte Internacional de Justicia. 🇬🇾☮️🇻🇪 #Venezuela#Guyana#Esequibo#Essequibo
Guyana is about 214,969 km² in size, stretching across vast rainforests, rivers, and rich natural landscapes. From coast to interior, every part of it belongs to Guyana. 🇬🇾
“Mi Mapa de Venezuela” is a propaganda page spreading misinformation about Guyana and Essequibo, sharing fake maps and reposting Guyanese content without credit. Guyana continues to defend its territorial integrity and the truth online.
@sepehoy21@victor3007 The ICJ is not “interference” it is the agreed mechanism under the 1966 Geneva Agreement to resolve the dispute peacefully. The case is about the legal validity of the 1899 Arbitral Award, not “all or nothing.”
@sepehoy21@victor3007 The claim doesn’t match the record. The “good offices” process ended because both sides couldn’t reach agreement, not due to one-sided refusal. The Essequibo dispute predates ExxonMobil and oil discoveries by decades. The ICJ case is state vs state.
@sepehoy21@victor3007 Guyana is the state in the ICJ case, not ExxonMobil. The company is not a party to the dispute and does not control the legal process. State legal strategy is handled by Guyana itself. The ICJ case is Guyana vs Venezuela nothing more, nothing less.
@sepehoy21@victor3007 Citing territorial disputes doesn’t prove the ICJ is controlled by powerful states. The Court has ruled against major powers before, including the US in Nicaragua v. United States. The ICJ decides on law and evidence, not strength. That’s exactly why states use it.