My new paper on the meta-problem of consciousness is finally published! If you want to see what is up with this cool new a posteriori version of Russellian Physicalism check out the paper bellow: https://t.co/E1DJmPjyZs
How can physical matter undergo conscious experience? 🧠💭
BIAP members Markel Kortabarria and Marcelino Botín discuss how physicalists about the mind should draw on the metaphysical notion of grounding in their latest Open Philosophy Blog entry! 💡
🔗 https://t.co/LmjnwKjKsl
@PawelHuryn In any case, I don't think that droping the binary thinking makes the fact that, on your metric, Europe should have a very rich form of consciouness any easier to accept. Not a know down objection to the metrict, but it does suggest it may be too liberal
@PawelHuryn I don't think it matters, you could make Europe model itself as such if it does not already. About your suggestion, if consciouness is a physical property then you are probably right (though some theories do postulate physical thresholds).
Clarification: May 4 (today!) is the deadline for the scholarship application. Course applications have no deadline as of now.
Feel free to share if you know anyone who might be interested!
My paper "The Acquaintance Trilemma: Knowledge, Consciousness, and Mental Qualities" has been accepted for publication in Erkenntnis!
Preprint available here:
https://t.co/iFYbdV7O4K
https://t.co/waUkFsVYRw
A paper I wrote some time ago is finally forthcoming in AJP. In it, I introduce a new view—a posteriori Russellian physicalism—and argue that, unlike other physicalist positions, it can accommodate revelation within a physicalist framework.
@haterdeplotino@2Philosophical_ quizas solo estamos hablando de quien se merece el label ilusionista y quien no jaja Funfact: estoy con Papineau en un summer school en valencia y ayer nos contaba que Galen Strawson que por lo visto son super colegas le llamo ilusionista y que tuvieron una pelea jajj
@haterdeplotino@2Philosophical_ propia estrategia argumentativa, tiene que negar esto siempre (Frankish), y explicar porque pensamos que hay verdades que acerca de la conciencia que se puede capturar mediante estos conceptos (fenomenicos) cuando en realidad no las hay