@algekalipso What's the source to know that a large percentage of the population doesn't have a voice in their head? And you say also that those people naturally do not judge at all? Sorry to judge but that doesn't sound right...
@martinmbauer equation, as in classical mechanics but with an extra potential (the "quantum potential"). This is the starting point of the derivation for the pilot-wave or de Broglie-Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics. Bohmian mechanics!
@martinmbauer Nice! Another interesting point is that the Schrödinger equation can be rewritten as two real equations, one of them being the continuity equation for the probability current (which assures that the probability is conserved in time), and the other one being a Hamilton-Jacobi 1/2
BOGOTÁ 2025, del 15 al 17 de octubre
Hasta el 31 de mayo se encuentra abierta la convocatoria para presentar ponencias y pósters
Las conferencias y los talleres serán dictados por reconocidos especialistas en Bayes-IA-ML
https://t.co/eyM8dfarwa
@toninote@GastonGiribet Eso, tengo la misma pregunta. ¿Esto no aumenta la probabilidad de que la vida sea de origen extraterrestre? Después habría que barajar hipótesis de asteroides con AA solo de quiralidad izquierda, o que los de derecha se desintegraron antes de formar organismos que se reproduzcan.
@santisiri lo que me parece impresionante es que no te quiere decir directamente la solución, sino que te quiere llevar de la mano para que vos lo resuelvas
Bayes Plurinacional presenta la Escuela-Congreso 2024 con el apoyo de @Khipu_AI (la organización latinoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial) del 6 al 9 de agosto del 2024 en la Universidad Nacional de Salta (@RectoradoUNSa). Registre una propuesta en https://t.co/tT0a9pTB97
@csaez_math@kareem_carr Exactly. Frequentism is impossible in such circumstances, and causal reasoning (in such circumstances) can only be modeled in a bayesian way.
@kareem_carr The Bayesian interpretation is: to the most of my knowledge (the data available + an assumption that I can clearly tell you what it is) there is a 25% chance that event X will happen (or that statement X is true).
@GastonGiribet En realidad hay un gran grupo de filósofos de la mente (entre ellos Dan Dennett) que aseguran que el determinismo es compatible con el libre albedrío. Se llaman compatibilistas.
But seriously folks, this a short and juicy tirade in which I say:
(0) there will be superhuman AI in the future
(1) they will be under our control
(2) they will not dominate us nor kill us
(3) they will mediate all of our interactions with the digital world
(4) hence, they will need to be open platforms so that everyone can contribute to training and tuning them.