I remember Sjokz 10+ years ago in LOL Esports. She was ~30 and enjoying her spot as the EU Hot Girl in Esports. Never got married and showed no intent to get married.
Now she's a childless pro-abortion leftist who probably supports open borders.
What a tragedy.
This is exactly why I retired from esports.
Based Christian Perkz makes a 100% common sense take and his spineless fag "friends" and teammates none go to defend him.
Also 40y old childless bag Sjokz gets offended, probably had few abortions herself lmao
Dave Chapelle: "Ever since that guy Charlie Kirk got murdered, I feel better."
Do you feel better that a father was brutally murdered, leaving his wife widowed and children fatherless?
Chapelle as a black guy says he feels better that white man is dead.
I mock anyone who thinks Chapelle is a "based" guy.
Protect your own, not your enemies. Dave Chapelle will get himself in trouble in the future. When he does let the left destroy him, then laugh at him.
After Dave Chappelle was attacked on stage by a violent leftist lunatic in 2022, Charlie Kirk defended his free speech and condemned the violence.
Today, Dave Chappelle returned the favor by gloating over how happy he is Charlie was brutally murdered.
Never give leftist snakes who will backstab you any benefit of the doubt. They will exploit the olive branch you extend and the free speech you ardently defend to murder you and celebrate it.
Understand what time it is.
Woman are so cooked.
Listen to Sjokz, gleefully brag about her support of baby murder and the pride she has for what happened to Perkz.
This chick thinks she is a leader and champion of women’s rights because she supports the murder of unborn children.
One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"
And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.
It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.
Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.
In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.
So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?
This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.
If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.
And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.
This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.
This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.
Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.
The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.
And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.
Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.
In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."
In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".
Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.
We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.
What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.
Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.
2 days after losing the 1986 midterms, Reagan signed an amnesty deal with Democrats
The "deal" granted citizenship to 2.7 MILLION illegals, turning California permanently blue
We better not repeat this mistake
Spot on a lot the lack of organization we see from anons.
Having been on the ground it abundantly common for these young men to meme but not volunteer anywhere in politics. Therefore they accomplish nothing.
Ted Kaczynski's critique of Conservatives:
Progress is a lie. Civilization is not advancing into some magical utopia. Rather, all differences are being smoothed out and civilization leveled into an indistinguishable sameness — this is the function of technology.
Ted writes:
"the loss of traditional values and of local autonomy is an unavoidable result of technological progress."
The error of Conservatives is to believe that moral "immorality" or "big government" are the fault. The reality is more so that:
Our people have been fully subservient to the technological system for so many generations that it is now impossible for any of us to conceive of a world beyond absolute servitude to its expansion.
The root of moral and political discussion is merely how to more optimally increase the efficiency of the system, never to go beyond it.
The false binary of “liberal” vs “conservative”, of “red team vs blue team” is a necessary surrogate activity that convinces individuals that they personally have power. Give slaves the illusion of freedom and they will never rebel.
Promise a future of infinite comforts and the concept of rebellion will be deleted forever. Quell any potential resistance before the idea can be generated.
The people serve one god alone and its name is "Progress". It is a jealous god that seeks to absolve all unique expressions of identity, all elements of divinity in the world, so that it alone is worshiped.
Jaques Ellul writes that "technology has become autonomous from the machine". It is the force of optimal efficiency in itself. We collectively experience the force as civilizational decline yet term the force as advancement.
Individuals must be made to feel that they have authentic agency. However, they “can decide only in favor of the technique that gives the maximum efficiency. But this is not choice.”
Ted asserts, therefore, that the system automates efficient expansion through the provision of various “surrogate activities” to complete.
“These include scientific work, athletic achievement, humanitarian work, artistic and literary creation, climbing the corporate ladder, acquisition of money and material goods far beyond the point at which they cease to give any additional physical satisfaction, and social activism when it addresses issues that are not important for the activist personally, as in the case of white activists who work for the rights of nonwhite minorities.”
Twitter Anons have a hyper fixation on the surrogate activity they self-identify as “retaking positions of power” through “meme warfare”. They post endlessly into the void with their collection of dolls (wojack images) about whatever trending topic is manufactured by the force of efficiency (ai algorithms). The Anon then confuses the quantity of imaginary numbers as assured victory.
Subjects that had absolutely no meaningful value just the day before become the sole methodology to gain “power”. Political change comes exclusively from posts, NEVER in-person organization. In fact, any who do advocate for authentic organization are immediately labeled as “federal agents” and immediately deleted.
The Anon scribes essay after essay about "the death of beauty", the degradation of his cultural values, the nostalgia for the 1900s, the erasure of his race. Notice how he resigns himself the exclusive activity of "noticing". It is "noticing" alone that is enough for a grand victory. It is verboten to actually do anything. Any action is terminated before it can be conceptualized. It is forbidden to move.
We are paralyzed and we worship our self castration as ideal state of victory. Older generations are no different.
The Anon prefers to blame the Boomer for all of his woes, but it is more likely his addiction to various surrogate activities that has crippled him from the ability to realize any positive future. The conservative Boomer is just as clueless to his participation in his own decline.
“For example, those who have an unusually strong drive for social status may spend their whole lives climbing the status ladder without ever getting bored with that game.”
The entire base identity of the conservative appears to be infiltration of institutions to advance to the top in the hierarchy. These hierarchies are not legitimate expressions of traditional, Aryan identity, but rather uniquely crafted illusions to suit every man so that he complies with his own slavery.
Boomers have trapped themselves into a structure that has optimized the destruction of both themselves personally and their generations in perpetuity. Saturn eats his children. A mother sacrifices her child to Baal/Moluch.
Modern man is completely incredulous to his own ritualized worship of his god. He has absolutely no knowledge of his subservience.
The worship is carried out with efficient perfection. It cannot even be said to be an unconscious ritual. The concept is lived perfectly but is nonexistent within the framework of his reality.
I remember Sjokz 10+ years ago in LOL Esports. She was ~30 and enjoying her spot as the EU Hot Girl in Esports. Never got married and showed no intent to get married.
Now she's a childless pro-abortion leftist who probably supports open borders.
What a tragedy.
This is exactly why I retired from esports.
Based Christian Perkz makes a 100% common sense take and his spineless fag "friends" and teammates none go to defend him.
Also 40y old childless bag Sjokz gets offended, probably had few abortions herself lmao
Trump 2024:
• Mass Immigration (legally)
• Trans Kids (with parental consent)
• No New Wars (except with Iran)
• Free Speech (except antisemitism)
• Pro-Life (but not at the federal level)
• Tax Cuts (for corporations)
The most important election of our lifetime!
I got flak for saying Trump betrayed his base after starting the Iran War. Now with even suggesting amnesty he's a traitor to the nation and must go.
Leaders with no loyalty to their people deserve no loyalty from their people.
Trump now suggesting his deportation policies were "too harsh", and that he wants to "work something out" with Democrats to grant amnesty to illegal farm and hospitality workers.
What a betrayal.
I've tempered my criticisms of Trump, to not make the jobs of friends in the Administration harder. Lots of appointees are doing great work, especially in the State Department.
But Trump squandered his political capital on the unpopular, unwinnable Iran war; and now is cucking on the one issue that his base bothered to show up and vote for during the disastrous midterms.
If one party can let in millions of people, and another removes only a few hundred-thousand at most, then you don't have a country anymore.
Amnesty gives the enemy a tool of permanent demographic disfiguration, which dilutes your political power.
If you stop the inward flow of migrants, but do not reverse mass migration, it's like turning the taps off in your flooded house but refusing to bail the water out.
For America to survive, the deportations must continue. If Trump isn't willing to do that, he isn't the man anymore.
@triothugs I will be genetically successful while she's a genetic dead end. I hope you don't pass on your genetics either after seeing this big brain take of yours. Idiocracy as a future doesn't appeal to me.
Funny how he dropped the "I am just as American as you" act as soon as he was elected.
Now he pronounces his name in Arabic, says arabic slang, and talks about Islam openly. He also started Habibi PAC, to fund Islamic power in the government.
These people are not your friends
Folks, @EWErickson is right that H-1B holders can’t vote. That’s exactly the point. The H-1B isn’t a temporary worker program anymore, it’s a citizenship pipeline.
Since 1990, roughly 2,000,000 Indian nationals have naturalized through it. Six plus years on the visa, then a green card, then five more to citizenship. They’re not guests. They’re voters. And when they vote, 62% back Democrats. 19% Republicans.
That’s the October 2026 Carnegie survey. In 2020, it was 68 to 22. The margin hasn’t closed, it’s widened.
Abbott begged the tech companies to come to Texas. He helped turn it blue. It will likely stay blue. As went CA due to mass immigration, Texas will now follow…
Folks, Greg Abbott did this to himself. He begged the tech companies to come to Texas, and he had them bring their H1b employees, most of which are from India. 70 to 80 percent vote democrat.
He pleased big business and got himself voted out.
Did you ever wonder why the US Border Patrol was not mass deporting illegal aliens out of Houston or Dallas wholesale?
His chickens have come home to roost.
"Bringing back jobs to America." - Bull Shit.
I present to you: a list of every American headquartered company with over 5,000 employees in the country of India alone.
This list continues to grow rapidly every year.
It’s such a shame that, after the Black Death, European countries chose to wait 200 years for their populations to recover from losing 30–60% of their people instead of simply importing 50 million non-Europeans.
The massive labour shortage led to a dramatic acceleration in the decline of serfdom in Western Europe, because serfs were in demand and could negotiate higher wages, better working conditions and the freedom to move.
The selfish serfs’ choice to improve their lives, instead of thinking about GDP growth and importing millions of non-Europeans to help the economy, also forced the already poor feudal lords to invest in new machinery and tools so they could employ fewer people and offset rising wages.
All because of their racist agenda of not wanting to import 50 million non-Europeans.
Was literally explaining the, "society falls when old men don't plant trees they will never sit under" to my neighbor (boomer)
He said he didn't get it and why would he plant trees if won't be around to see them