Stand-in so good… almost like it was all planned 🤪
🇲🇰 Jane "aidKiT" Apostoloski
The missing piece we were looking for 🔥
Welcome to the family, @aidKiT_CS#jazdabrute
Hello, today my contract with @brute_gg1 has been terminated by mutual agreement.
I would like to thank the organization, the players, and the BRUTE fans for this period.
I am now a free agent and I want to continue my career as an In-Game Leader. I’m more motivated than ever to achieve success on my path! I have a lot of confidence in both my individual firepower and my game sense.
If anyone is interested, feel free to contact me via DM or through my agent -> @Kuba__Chmiel
Thank you for every retweet and every kind word.
Ahoj, nabízím coaching pro lidi, kteří se chcou zlepšit. Mám zkušenosti s týmovým hraním, 2x MČR semifinále, 3. místo MSR, a přes 4K elo na FACEITU poslední sezónu. Coaching přizpůsobím podle toho co ty konkrétně chceš a potřebuješ zlepšit. Pokud máš zájem, neboj se ozvat do DMs
Pierwszy mecz na HLTV w nowym składzie (i mną na AWP) wygrany!
Dużo błedów popełniamy przez które rundy uciekają, ale kurwa je naprawimy :)
GG WP
Jutro meczyk na LEO o wyjscie z grupy Nodwin
@brute_gg1
Can we stop pretending that teams signing up for 2 simultaneous events is ok?
That's a place to start. You can not play simultaneous LAN events where you have "scheduling conflicts"?
How about that?
Why are you in two simultaneous LAN events if you can't play both and know you likely need to forfeit some matches in one of them?
Answer:
Because you know that even if you have to forfeit it won't affect your own chance of going to the major (statistically).
This is the reason for whats going on in Asia and it is the reason for what FaZe is doing in EU.
Therein lies the gaming of the qualification and that is what should be addressed.
How about something like if a team forfeits mid event due to "scheduling conflicts", all past wins and future matches in the event will be turned into forfeit defeats as well?
That should do the trick.
TYLOO only plan like this because they gamed the system and came to the conclusion that it was net-positive in the current model to act like this.
FaZe behaved even worse in my opinion. They straight up knew when entering HLC Belgrade that they couldn't play PGL Bucharest opening matches then and still opted for HLC because the punishment they looked into was not hard enough, we have to assume.
Why are they not just given 3 forfeit defeats and the -75 pts or so it would cost them?
Why are they allowed by PGL to potentially go net-positive in PGL Bucharest, making it worth for them to take the piss on the other teams behaving ethically correct (in my opinion).
I hope changes will come 🙏
Hello, I am currently LFT after we partways with Brute
Second Star (flex – Anchor / Star)
- HLTV match experience
- LAN tournament experience
- Multiple seasons ESEA Advanced + Playoffs
Available full-time / part-time
DMs open
RT appreciated 🫶
POV: just walking down the street…
…next thing you know - BRUTE 💀
Picked up.
Put to work.
No excuses.
🎵 TERRAPIE - WE ARE SINNERS (excerpt)
#jazdabrute
Oh… and we almost forgot…
We can’t leave our new lineup without a coaching staff 🤫
New leadership. Higher standards. Clear ambition.
Team BRUTE welcomes 🇸🇪 Swedish head coach André “BARBARR” Möller - former 1.6 pro with experience from Valorant’s top league (VCT). A coach who helped to shape talents like hampus, SunPayus and draken.
With @BARBARRcs setting the direction and Erik “The eLiVe” Sith continuing as assistant coach & analyst, our foundation gets stronger than ever.