Crowned in velvet, strutting in heels,
Declaring royalty with theatrical zeal.
“I'm the original Queen Bitch!” he cries,
While common sense quietly rolls its eyes.
Long may he reign... in his own disguise. 😏👑
@LHandwoven@KaiseratCB So in a stadium full of thousands, you are dumb enough to believe that PH couldn't get a ticket to go to it if he wanted to?? I'm not a celebrity and my family is attending the WC.
Correcting the Record — Royal Edition
The Royal Family’s Real Estate Problem Is Apparently Less Interesting Than Harry’s Mortgage
For years we’ve been told that Prince Harry’s finances are somehow a matter of national importance.
His mortgage.
His Netflix deal.
His book deal.
His speaking engagements.
His security costs.
His business ventures.
If Harry buys a house, it’s news.
If Harry refinances a house, it’s news.
If Harry sneezes near a bank, somebody in the British press is probably writing a story about it.
We’ve watched years of headlines dissecting every dollar the Duke of Sussex earns, spends, borrows, saves, or invests.
And yet somehow, when questions arise about royal housing arrangements, peppercorn rents, royal property deals, and who benefits from them, the volume suddenly gets turned way down.
Funny how that works.
Recent reporting has raised fresh questions about Prince Andrew’s ability to generate income from subletting cottages connected to Royal Lodge while benefiting from a peppercorn-rent arrangement.
Now let’s be clear.
This isn’t about claiming wrongdoing where none has been proven.
It’s about asking why certain financial stories receive relentless scrutiny while others seem to receive a fraction of the attention.
Because if we’re going to talk about money, let’s talk about all of it.
If we’re going to talk about accountability, let’s apply it equally.
If we’re going to ask questions, let’s ask them of everyone.
What makes this so absurd is that Harry no longer receives funding from the Sovereign Grant.
He doesn’t receive public money to support his lifestyle.
He lives in California.
He earns his own income.
He pays his own bills.
Yet somehow his mortgage has become one of the British media’s favorite long-running soap operas.
Meanwhile, stories involving royal estates, royal properties, royal housing privileges, and long-standing financial arrangements often seem to generate significantly less outrage.
Why?
Why is a private citizen’s mortgage more interesting than questions involving royal property arrangements?
Why is Harry’s bank account endlessly fascinating while other financial questions are treated like awkward family business nobody wants to discuss?
The answer might make some people uncomfortable.
Because for years, Harry and Meghan Sussex have been the industry’s most reliable source of clicks, outrage, engagement, television segments, YouTube videos, and newspaper traffic.
Their finances get examined under a microscope.
Everyone else’s finances often get treated with a magnifying glass left in the drawer.
That’s not balance.
That’s not consistency.
And it sure as hell isn’t equal scrutiny.
If the media wants to investigate royal money, investigate royal money.
All of it.
Not just the parts involving the couple you’ve built an entire cottage industry around attacking.
Because from where I’m sitting, the question was never really Harry’s mortgage.
The question is why some people keep counting Harry’s pockets while looking the other way when the spotlight lands a little closer to the palace gates.
Funny as hell how that works.
TL:DR?
The #RacistRoyals ARE racists
The #ToxicBritishMedia cosign it
RF/BM want to punish the Superior royal for loving & marrying a successful Black woman w/self respect who birthed him kids that have his brother's wife dyeing her daughter's hair & makes the RF look subpar
@UnJourSansMoi@theroyaleditor Notice we don't hear any more about royal displays at the Chelsea flower show?? I thought when they didn't want CAMFED to have a display that was supposed to be the end of H&M? 😂 OG squaddies iykyk.
@Mack121@SageKnowsAll@benjic_parody Yeah except she never went by her billionaire Nigerian fathers last name and goes by her mother's 2nd or 3rd husbands name.
Had the royal family left Prince Harry and Meghan be, went on about their pretend-to-serve BS, the Prince Andrew scandal wouldn’t have shown their mafia like tactics so crudely.
People are sickened over how they use the UK media to smear the Sussexes to coverup Andrew’s crimes.