Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸

Software engineer/small bus. owner/musician.
Interested in philosophy, history, economics, politics, music, literature, classic film. Newly single.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

Most modern political arguments can be reduced to Locke vs. Rousseau. Locke is always right.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@Gena_I_Gorlin Are you saying no one lived past the age of twelve???

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

I was always vocal about my ideas, political and otherwise. And I had a reputation for discussing differences with others politely and objectively. I had many friendships that crossed over divides.

Starting somewhere during the pandemic, I began to scale back. I endured too many callous insults, too many conversations where I couldn't get underneath the emotional baggage.

Every friendship I thought I might save by shutting my mouth I have now lost. I regret holding back.

I don't know your precise reasons for pulling back here. But I hope you give it a lot of thought, and consider all the contingencies.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@Sqorbnj @AriFleischer @JonahDispatch Your insults and presumptions might look less deranged if accompanied by some response to the points being made. For starters, Ari isn't claiming Trump is good for NATO. He's claiming that some NATO nations, due to their own actions, are no longer valuable to the alliance.

[Melissa Chen @MsMelChen]

Let’s be real here. Europe has spent decades freeloading on American security. Even now, with every NATO member finally hitting the 2% GDP target in 2025.

But beyond the financial contributions, the real rupture is philosophical and the Iran crisis has shown a spotlight on it.

Europe worships process. Endless committees, consultations, and “predictability.” Macron actually calls it a virtue. For Trump, this is paralysis as his style is to articulate a threat, fix a target, and act. The Americans are men of conviction and purpose. Europe on the other hand lives by bureaucratic liturgy and in high-minded abstractions.

Sure, Americans might make mistakes when acting. But Europe never considers what the costs of not acting actually are.

Just look at how their nations are doing on various fronts, especially on the border crisis, and you see the same cancerous rot that undergirds their foreign policy approach play out domestically. It's the same problem on a different scale.

Iran is currently holding the Strait of Hormuz hostage, choking 20% of global oil and spiking prices past $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the regime is bleeding from strikes, its nuclear ambitions are still alive despite degraded capability, and its proxies are firing missiles at allies and oil tankers. If this isn’t a clear and present danger to the global economy - of which Europe is a part - then I don’t know what is.

Yet when Washington asked to use European bases to finish the job - bases the US has defended for generations, the response was hesitation and hand-wringing. The US did strike from RAF Fairford, but only after warnings that British soil could become a “legitimate target.”

If you cannot agree that a theocratic regime with eschatological ambitions who have shown no restraint in hitting out at Gulf countries and threatening the world’s energy jugular is an enemy worth confronting, then what, exactly, are we allies about?

Europe loves to preen about being tough on Russia. They issue condemnations and speeches and slap sanctions that hardly work to cripple the Russian economy.

Now here was a chance to do something concrete: let the Americans use the bases they already pay for, help clear the Strait, and actually degrade the Iranian war machine that arms Moscow’s proxies. Turmp didn’t ask for boots on the ground or any kind of more offensive action. All he wanted was permission to operate from the infrastructure America has underwritten for decades.

They couldn’t even manage that.

So can you blame the Americans for seeing NATO for what it is? A paper-tiger alliance that expects Washington to bleed and pay while Brussels and London convenes and deliberates.

If Europe refuses to treat Iran as the threat it is while happily letting American power keep the Strait open and the lights on, then the alliance is already dead. Trump is simply stating the obvious and the Americans are becoming very reluctant to subsidize the European delusion any longer.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@Alinavisoo_life If she's smart, and open to reason, then yes. If she's bitchy, insistent, and--most importantly--wrong, then, obviously, no.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@Mishi_2210 18

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@onlyyou_5510 127

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

First off, "times" is not a verb!! You don't "times it by" you "multiply it by."

And what you multiply it by is 2 (20%), not 4 (40%), and that's only if you get excellent service. Mediocre service should be 15% at most, and poor service should be 10% or less.

So, you just failed grammar, mathematics, and ethics.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@Amer1can_Barbie Soylent Green is people!!!

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@honeymoon250 Bacon, of course.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@Amer1can_Barbie Did you sing "Auld Lang Syne"? It saddens me that that tradition which lasted for roughly two centuries has disappeared recently.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@EmilySm43 5

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@mogulstylist02 Better than most, not as well as some. Yourself?

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@mogulstylist02 Good evening. 🌚

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@softrebels Gambling

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@otokyo Kayak
Kink

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@otokyo Pyewacket

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@travelingflying Dicks.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@ohhanxiety If it were "divided IN half," it would be 250 + 50 = 300. "Divided BY half" means 500 ÷ 0.5 (which is 1,000) + 50 = 1,050. It's really a grammar puzzle.

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@EmilySm43 Insecure neediness. (Not to be confused with neediness born of ambitious desire, which can be quite sexy.)

[Mark Peter (Me/Myself/I) 🇺🇸 @markalanpeter]

@khrachvik Your statement indicates only that you've done a very bad job of seeking out the best arguments. Can you even summarize, in economic terms, the difference between a planned economy and a market-driven one, and explain why one would be expected to function better than the other?