INSANE FOOTAGE: Thousands of migrants continue crossing from Morocco into Spain’s Ceuta enclave, as local officials reportedly urge Madrid to declare a national emergency.
"Strange how so many powerful men are pedophiles"
Actually, intelligence agencies identify pedophiles and then put them in positions of power so they can control them with blackmail, this has been happening since way before Epstein
You can tell a lot about an individual by whether they ask if they can reinvent themselves or start afresh at a certain age. If growth is all that you have ever known, you know it is never-ending, the only true constant. There is no age limit. The very limit you perceive has been prescribed by mainstream society. The question you should be asking is - who are you living for? You can start at any moment, at any time. You just need to follow through and have the guts to back yourself, even when there is no one standing behind you, even when no one has got you, back yourself with conviction, because that is the litmus test of alignment - you feel it with such ferocious fervour that it no longer matters what others think, because the knowing permeates every cell, every fibre, every sinew. It is in your marrow, in your heart, beating with righteous outrage.
Those who have walked this path know solitude intimately, they know that those who truly resonate will gravitate. So fear not. Stare into the sun.
Don’t speak unless spoken to was for women’s own good not men’s. We were never supposed to see the full depths of how retarded women are. We are supposed to fall in love and be pussy whipped just enough to tolerate the dumb things that will inevitably come up. We’re over exposed
Be More Like Me
Women’s theory of mind of men is essentially that we’re taller, uglier, stronger women with shorter hair.
Their words will say otherwise, “No we know you’re big tuff boys Ford trucks barbells scotch sports grrrr”. But their behaviors belie this when they do things like recommend therapy for everything (female solution, talking about feelings, passive, they fetishize this constantly) and even in subtle things like thinking criticizing appearance matters to us in remotely the same way.
These are symptoms of a broader temperamental impulse: female prescription is almost always some variation of… talk about it more. Describe the thing with new words. Examine the feeling. Name the feeling. Sit with the feeling. Discuss the feeling with a licensed feelings professional. Verbal, interior, passive.
However, men don’t project their solutions onto women in this way.
When women are struggling, men don’t tell them to build something. Become useful. Gain competence. Shoulder responsibility and accountability. Lift something heavy. Impose order on a neglected corner of the world. Sack up and get it together. Nobody pities a weak, useless man.
Men understand they’re dealing with a fundamentally different, softer creature. This is a form of empathy: comprehending a theory of mind not your own. The obverse isn’t true for women’s comprehension of men.
Per the posts below, they imagine that criticizing a man’s appearance will injure him the same way it injures them! They assume the same pressure points because they assume the same creature.
They’ll consistently try to make us More Like Them, because deep down they believe we’re the same thing. A “One race the human race. One sex the human sex. We’re all equal.”-kind of beautifully naive Blank Slatism. Equality, not hierarchy, is their north star and the moral axiom of “we are all equal, so we are all mostly the same” crops up constantly. In addition to the temperamental research, I’ve experienced this in some form with almost every single woman I’ve had a semi-sustained interaction with.
This is where I diverge with psychological literature saying women have higher empathy; I think that’s mislabeled in a serious way. Empathy entails elevated theory of mind of Another. Projecting feminine cognition and feminine solutions onto everything is antithetical to empathy.
It’s more accurate to say they have higher sympathy: which is consistent with well-known temperamental traits of wanting to reduce harm and promoting an “ethic of care”. There’s no theory of mind involved in sympathy.
The female impulse is to change him into behavioral resemblance… “Be More Like Me”:
- Sand off the edges.
- Lecture away idiosyncrasies.
- Verbalize what he’d rather act upon.
- Pathologize what cannot be feminized (i.e. toxic masculinity).
- “I’m civilizing you”… the pleasant way to say “being More Like Me is right, being Like You is wrong”, clinically known as narcissism.
Why can’t you be more like me???
A smart woman I’ve known for years still tries to peddle astrology and woo to me. However I don’t reciprocate by sitting her down with temperament research, endocrinology, and population-level trait distributions until I’ve extinguished her sense of enchantment.
What’s amusing is she’s a “humans have 100% agency” believer while performing the same loop of biologically programmed behaviors and thought processes. She’s a quintessential example of precisely the genetic, constrained agency I describe. I don’t point this out, because I like that she has a sense of childlike wonder to her. I don’t need to make her More Like Me.
I understand that magical thinking helps preserve a distinctly feminine experience of wonder (this is me empathizing). She cannot comprehend the reverse: that I don’t experience concreteness, mechanism, and biological reality as some bleak prison from which I need to be liberated. I’ve told her this. Doesn’t matter. Genuinely unfathomable. I reiterate: this woman is no idiot. I’ve noticed the ability to empathize isn’t related to intelligence.
I like reality. My “wonder” is grounded. My “magic” is in the mechanisms. I don’t need the universe to flirt with me and pretend “Saturn is in retrograde” to find purpose.
She cannot internalize that I’m not a defective version of her. That thermodynamics and systems do for me what enchantment does for her! She likes to float. I like to walk. “You need to float more. You need to be More Like Me”. Okay love.
Watch how often criticism of men is simply female self-reference wearing moral language:
- “You need to be more emotionally intelligent” → assign emotions the importance I assign them.
- “You need to be more vulnerable” → present your interiority in a format recognizable and reassuring to me.
- “You need therapy” → submit your problems to the feminine method of processing.
The man isn’t being understood as a man. He’s being graded as an incorrectly assembled woman. “You should Be More Like Me!” is what’s tacitly conveyed underneath all these comments.
————————————————————————————————————
Consider the asymmetry embedded in the word emasculated. Why is there no feminine equivalent?
We instinctively recognize that masculinity can be stripped away, softened, humiliated, rendered harmless. That a man can be brought down from a difficult, higher-energy, achieved state into something more passive, dependent, meek, and compliant. Why? Where did this implicit understanding come from…? We narrate "social construction!" over biological expression.
The female embryo is the default state; it’s what develops in the absence of androgenic energetic construction in utero and the hardening in life that masculinity requires. At every stage of gestation, the male fetus requires more action and more energy to be built. The female embryo, in physics terms, takes The Path of Least Action to develop. The embryo defaults to female if no androgens intercede.
One emerges naturally by default. The other must be built, defended, and can be dismantled. Human Becoming vs Human Being.
Feminine advice to men carries the same destination:
Become gentler. Become softer. Become more verbal. Become less dangerous. Become easier to understand. Become more manageable. Become more passive.
Become, in every meaningful respect, More Like Her.
The Default State seeks default state.
Falso, actualmente en cualquier lado te encontrás a un pibe entre 18-25 que nunca ha olido una concha
En cambio las mujeres le imploran al estado que el aborto sea gratuito porque no pueden cerrar las piernas
Eric Bana trained every day for six months to get in this "slightly toned" shape for Troy. People's perception of human physiology is completely fucked, man.
If you think that this is just something for fun, you are beyond stupid. Rewriting history will be easier when you can make fake AI footage to back it up. A new Orwellian nightmare reality.