Atheos

Atheist.likes a fair game to be played.Dislikes injustice and unnecessary behavior .loves science ,Hates magical thinking

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@Lord_Sugar Any good?

[Gareth █████ @geek_gareth]

Henry Nowak's death is more horrific than you think:

>Henry was stabbed ~11:30 pm, Henry was not pronounced dead until 67 minutes later (12:37 am). It gets worse...

> During this time. Dagwa & his brother (who arrived shortly after the attack, it was his brother who phoned 999, not to phone an ambulance, he phoned police alleging Henry attacked them.

>It's been reported that there was some deliberation/ delay before phoning 999. Alleging Henry drunkenly attacked them (Henry was sober; blood alcohol below the drink-drive limit). Digwa's brother wanted to punish Henry.

>Exact quotes from the call (read out in court at Southampton Crown Court):
“We’ve just got attacked racially by some white person. He’s physically attacked my brother, we’re Sikhs, we wear a turban and he’s just attacked my brother. We’re restraining him right now because he’s just attacked my brother and took my brother’s turban off. He also said, he’s verbally attacked my brother racially. I’m not having this as a regular occurrence, I live here, I’m not having this a regular occurrence. He ain’t fighting people, he’s racially attacking people, that’s what he’s doing. Nah, he sees some brown people, that’s what it was.”

> were restraining Henry until the police arrived (Digwa stole Henry's phone so he couldn't get help).

>When the police arrived, Digwa's father was holding Henry against a wall (his father said: "He keeps dropping down, so I am just trying to keep him up". There was also a visible blood trail, but it is unknown when officers first noticed it (different sources described it when the police entered the scene, another was after Henry passed out).

>His mother removed the murder weapon from the scene.

>Police bodycam footage was played in court (audio only, no video; another source said a transcript was read):
Henry says “I am dying”;
Digwa replies “You’re not dying bro.”
{Approximately 10 minutes later}: Henry says “You stabbed me”;
Digwa denies it and accuses Nowak of recording him.
Henry's final recorded words: “Please brother, I can’t breathe.”
{He passed out a few minutes later}

>Before the attack, Henry was recording a video of Digwa on his phone, it is a weird exchange: Henry singing/yawning, then addressing Digwa: “Innit bad man, what bad man. You’re a bad man, say you’re a bad man, go on.” Digwa replied: “I am a bad man.” The footage ended shortly before the stabbing.

Some critical details that haven't been released:
>The time the 999 call was made.
>The full 999 transcript.
>The time the police arrived.
>The time an ambulance was called (an air ambulance >flew in a doctor).

I question the order of the stabbing:
>There's a lack of defensive wounds on Henry's arms and hands (Henry was sober).
>I believe Henry was stabbed in the groin and the back if the legs while he was trying to scale a fence to get away (you can't easily get to a man's groin area, there's a reason they're nicknamed the 'crown jewels'). Also, stab wounds to that area can be catastrophic; The aorta and arteries to the legs (the largest in the body) flow through there, not to mention the nerve endings. The way they pinned Henry against a wall, where he would be losing blood faster.

>Given what I have read so far, I don't understand why there haven't been charges against the brother & father. They were aware that Henry had been stabbed, but they continued to forcefully detain him (the very definition of false imprisonment). I'd argue it was sadistic torture. You can make the excuse of a single Sekh having mental health issues (they will), but that doesn't excuse the actions of Digwa's brother, mother & father.

Some of the research & sources:
https://t.co/x4mVK7ybhS

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

After endless engineering calculations, the result is achieved

[Saul Staniforth @SaulStaniforth]

The time Mick Lynch called the Lab candidate in Islington North "a private health profiteer" & Mandelson told him thats a nasty & disgraceful thing to say & a complete untruth

The host then interjects "he's an entrepreneur who's made money in private healthcare"

Mick: "Exactly"

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

Merry Christmas and a happy new year to one and all .

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

There's a line in a democracy that, once crossed, changes everything: when elections cease to be an obligation and become a variable. That line has now been crossed in Britain, and it's the state's own elections watchdog saying so.

The Electoral Commission has been explicit: Labour's justification for delaying local elections is not legitimate. Not unwise. Not clumsy. Illegitimate. Extending mandates damages public confidence, undermines local legitimacy, and creates a clear conflict of interest by letting councils decide how long they can avoid voters. In any functioning democracy, that would end the matter. Here, the government presses on regardless.

That's the scandal. This is no longer a party political dispute or a row between Reform and Labour. The referee has intervened and said the game is being rigged, and the players have decided to ignore the whistle. When a government continues with election delays after being told by the independent authority charged with protecting electoral integrity that its reasoning does not hold, the issue stops being reform and becomes power protecting itself.

The language Labour uses is revealing. Elections are framed as an inconvenience. Voters are framed as an administrative burden. Democracy is reduced to a cost-saving exercise, something to be postponed if the spreadsheets look untidy or the reorganisation plans are mid-flow. Ministers speak of "capacity constraints" as if the right to vote is a luxury item that must wait until the filing cabinets are rearranged. In a democracy, administration exists to serve elections. Elections do not exist to suit administration.

The conflict of interest identified by the Electoral Commission should alarm anyone who still believes in democratic norms. Councils are being asked whether they would like to delay the moment they must answer to voters. That's not consultation. It's self-dealing. No serious system allows those in power to decide how long they may remain there without consent. Yet this is now presented as a "locally led approach," as though outsourcing democratic suspension makes it virtuous.

Worse still is the uncertainty. Candidates have been selected. Campaigns have begun. Money has been spent. And with months to go before polling day, the government is still dangling the possibility of cancellation. The watchdog describes this uncertainty as unprecedented. That word matters. Democracies rely on predictability. Once elections become provisional, subject to last-minute ministerial approval, the entire process is degraded.

When challenged, ministers retreat into condescension. Chris Bryant waves away concerns as conspiracy and insists that "ordinary people" would think elections are "a bit daft." This is a familiar trick: speak for the public while denying them a voice. Redefine democratic rights as common-sense nuisances that sensible adults should stop fussing over. It's the rhetoric of managed democracy, where participation is tolerated only when it produces the correct outcome.

None of this is happening in isolation. Mayoral elections have already been postponed. Now council elections are being pushed back again. The pattern is clear. When the polls turn hostile, the timetable moves. When voters become unpredictable, the vote is delayed. Governments confident in their mandate do not need to buy time. They face the electorate and take their chances. Labour is not doing that because it knows what the numbers say.

The danger is not just that millions of people may be denied a vote next year. It's the precedent now being set. Once a government learns it can delay elections after the watchdog objects, after campaigns have begun and candidates are in place, the principle is broken. Elections become conditional. Democracy becomes something you are granted when those in power feel safe enough to allow it.

"Chris Bryant waves away concerns as conspiracy and insists that "ordinary people" would think elections are "a bit daft.""

[Toby Young @toadmeister]

With just 35% of secondary teachers and 15% of primary teachers being men, it’s not misogyny but misandry in the classroom we need to worry about, says Joanna Gray. We have an education system designed by women for girls. https://t.co/QVWgspK0r7

[The Telegraph @Telegraph]

🔴 'Like any mother of a teenage boy, I worry about toxic masculinity. But treating boys as porn-addled “predators in waiting” is not the answer' | Writes Camilla Tominey

Read more ⬇️

https://t.co/pV9DdWJ8kY

[Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA @StefanMolyneux]

British boys saw their fathers arrested for trying to protect their sisters from being raped.

The government needs to fix its credibility issue before lecturing boys.

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@GBNEWS What about the misandry

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@Suffragent_ Brilliant

[Suffragent @Suffragent_]

If boys must have ‘misogyny’ classes, let’s teach girls not to:

-Make false rape claims
-Trap men by pregnancy
-Groom/rape boys
-Alienate fathers from their kids
-Weaponise divorces
-Grope men in kilts
-Be violent
-Expect men to pay

Happy to write the lesson plan 👍🏻

[Lisa Britton @LisaBritton]

Although I believe your intentions are good, Prime Minister, I believe your moves will fuel the problems, not solve them…

You’re doubling down on “boys are bad.” One of the reasons why boys are increasingly moving toward more misogynistic content is because they’re seeing and feeling that they are shamed and blamed for everything and the world does not care about them. They move toward voices that make them feel accepted and valued.

If you want your daughter to grow up in a Britain where she feels safe, you must treat boys with love, respect and compassion, listen to their concerns and effectively address their issues… not vilify them even more.

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@NABurkinshaw On misandry girl enters classroom touches boy by the genitals, says he should of enjoyed it he's a boy, boy complains , there was no further action

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@Keir_Starmer You've just lost my vote , I've been Labour all my life .

[Everything & Nothing @DHewson]

@BBCNews We need boys trained to spot early signs of feminist man hating indoctrination from leftist female teachers.

[CJ @UnderSneege]

Our education system is designed by women for girls. It expects and rewards feminised behaviours. Boys are treated as dysfunctional girls rather than boys, and the state apparatus will clamp down on the consequences of it’s own beliefs rather than reconsider them.

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@GBNEWS It is unfair , its not balanced between both sexes . Both sexes have problems that need addressing

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@WindyBeaver Crawls back into cave and cries

[Atheos @markstilwellUK]

@WindyBeaver A 16 year old said ' are you enjoying your retirement ' I'm only 50 . How rude .