Marmar

[Karan Makvandi🏀 @loosebball]

@WhoIsHe_1999 سقف چسی در ایران بسیار پایینه و این خودش یک متاع منحصر به فرده. با تماشای یک رقابت رده هفتاد جهانی، در یک زمین تنیس نیمه مخروبه، با موزیک دست شش و ۴ تا ماشین پوکیده دور زمین یاور فکر می‌کنه فینال ویمبلدن تماشا می‌کنه و بغل دنیل کرگ نشسته.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@LilaGraceRose The person who brought a child to life who has to go under a ton of stress and pain! Forcing the parents to go under stress and caregiving responsibilities. They should thank her!

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@dogzrcoolnstuff @Melgibsonact And after seeing what extremely narrow exceptions have done in states like Texas and Florida, it makes perfect sense that Massachusetts would want doctors using medical judgment instead of waiting until a woman fits some legal definition of “sick enough.”

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@dogzrcoolnstuff @Melgibsonact That’s the whole point. A law can’t possibly list every medical situation that can go wrong in a pregnancy. These decisions should be made by the patient and the doctors actually treating her, not politicians trying to predict every scenario in advance.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

7/ And yes, when there is a true conflict, the mother’s health has to matter. She is an adult human being whose life cannot be treated as collateral damage while doctors wait for her condition to become catastrophic.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

1/ This is the part people keep missing: a fetal heartbeat does not mean the pregnancy can safely continue or that the fetus can survive outside the uterus.

[Mayor of Utopia @mayorofutopia_]

Whenever people accuse me of using "emotional language" because I say an abortion kills a baby, I simply point out that if it's makes them emotional, that's because deep down they know it's morally wrong

That's exactly what abortions do at a fundamental level. It's fact.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

6/ That’s why medicine cannot be reduced to “heartbeat = no abortion” or one arbitrary week written into law. Doctors need to make that call based on the actual patient in front of them.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

5/ The problem is there is no magic week where every fetus suddenly becomes viable. It depends on gestational age, fetal condition, weight, available NICU care and the individual pregnancy.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

4/ Later in pregnancy, when the baby can survive outside the uterus, of course doctors will usually deliver and try to save both. Nobody is arguing against that.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

3/ So what exactly are doctors supposed to do if she starts getting dangerously sick while there is still a heartbeat? Wait until the heartbeat stops? Wait until she is septic enough to satisfy a law?

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

2/ Example: a woman’s water breaks very early, say around 17–20 weeks. The fetus may still have a heartbeat, but it is too premature to survive if delivered. Meanwhile the mother can develop a serious infection, hemorrhage or sepsis if the pregnancy continues.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@DeniseRoars @Melgibsonact Severe hemorrhage, placental abruption, eclampsia or serious heart disease can require immediate termination, and whether a live delivery is safely possible depends on the actual condition of the mother and fetus.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@DeniseRoars @Melgibsonact At 34 weeks, doctors often do deliver for emergencies. But “LIVE BIRTH fixes every case” is medically false.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@Melgibsonact “Live birth” isn’t a treatment doctors can guarantee. At 34 weeks, delivery may absolutely be the right option, but some fetuses have lethal conditions and may die before, during, or shortly after birth. Medicine isn’t as simple as “just deliver a healthy baby.”

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@Melgibsonact At 34 weeks, women aren’t casually deciding they’re “done” with pregnancy. Abortions that late are extremely rare and usually involve catastrophic fetal diagnoses or serious threats to the mother’s health. Real families face devastating medical decisions—not your political slogan

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@sizzle_sarah The post mixes a false/misleading vaccine-miscarriage link, a selective but partially accurate description of late-term abortion policies in some blue states, and an unverified claim of Democratic rage over a real surrogacy dispute.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@sizzle_sarah @grok can you fact check these claims

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@Sassafrass_84 Easy example: a woman’s water breaks at 17 weeks, the fetus still has a heartbeat, but the pregnancy can’t survive and infection risk starts climbing. Should doctors wait until she’s septic before they’re allowed to end the pregnancy?

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@CollinRugg Easy example: a woman’s water breaks at 17 weeks, the fetus still has a heartbeat, but the pregnancy can’t survive and infection risk starts climbing. Should doctors wait until she’s septic before they’re allowed to end the pregnancy?

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@CollinRugg People keep fixating on 34 weeks. Pregnancy can go wrong at 5, 7, 17 weeks too. Complications don’t follow a political talking point.

[Marmar @marmariaaaaaa]

@KristanHawkins Easy example: a woman’s water breaks at 17 weeks, the fetus still has a heartbeat, but the pregnancy can’t survive and infection risk starts climbing. Should doctors wait until she’s septic before they’re allowed to end the pregnancy?