@father_rmv Apt observation of President Trump ->
He is severe only with hypocrites,
whom he could describe
as a race of vipers and
as whitened sepulchres --
from which we can see
Oh how much he detests duplicity.
@grok@RickGenie@LauraLoomer@amyactonoh@grok why is the Medical Board ignorant about her lie?
She has to answer the same question every time she renews her license. It must be answered every two years. Has she not lied about 15 times?
This was the Texas border under Biden. Total chaos and out of control.
Open-border and Islam-sympathetic Democrats, like James Talarico, want nothing more than for the border to look like this again.
As if Talarico’s campaign isn’t already having a bad day, a New York Times report released Sunday says dozens of TikTok accounts were paid $4 per 1,000 views to post positive clips about him. The company behind the payments is Frontier Media. Naturally his campaign says it had nothing to do with it. The money Frontier Media used to pay for pro-Talarico social content had to come from somewhere.
These paid “clippers” weren’t a tiny side effort. They accounted for nearly a quarter of the Talarico-related videos the Times looked at in a 24-hour window. The money’s source is still unclear and Frontier Media has no visible FEC filings. The campaign’s denial is noted, but the volume of paid content is not. Follow the money is the obvious course of action. Between today’s blockbuster mental health facility claims and now this NYT article on paid support for Talarico, it’s unthinkable that his campaign survives the week let alone a debate or election.
Organic support is one thing. A network of accounts getting paid by the view to flood the platform with positive clips is another. Voters can tell the difference. The appearance of a spontaneous online army collapses once the payments are documented. That’s what the Times just did.
It should be mentioned that a man in the U.S. just got sentenced to jail for artificially creating consumption of his AI songs on streaming services. There should be similar penalties for artificially creating support for a political candidate, without disclosing it, on social media. The fraud is for profit. In the streaming case financially, in the Talarico case politically and also financially. Both are clearly immoral and should be criminal.
Between now and Election Day there will be a massive disinformation campaign run by the Democrats, Establishment Republicans and Legacy Media to demoralize Republican voters. Don't get suckered. Don't believe any of the polling data or the fake news. Don't be influenced by GOP grifters like Karl Rove. We must push back against this Communist insurgency. We must vote Republican in November.
@RickGenie@grok@LauraLoomer@amyactonoh No credit due ! Grok told me everything..
If you live in Ohio, you can report as a citizen!
Dr. Amy Acton, MD license 35.066895
file here:
https://t.co/8OfThC9JWp
@grok@RickGenie@LauraLoomer@amyactonoh Since I am not licensed in Ohio, I plead with every Ohio physician who reads this to fulfill your statutory duty and file this complaint against Dr. Amy Acton
@grok@RickGenie@LauraLoomer@amyactonoh So any physician licensed to practice in Ohio who reads this has a statutory duty to report. Is https://t.co/8OfThC9JWp the proper way to do it online?
@grok@RickGenie@LauraLoomer@amyactonoh Is this true?
If you hold an Ohio Medical Lyicensee, you have a statutory Duty to Report this violation directly to the board; relying on a supervisor or peer-review committee to report it does not fulfill your personal legal obligation.