Marc Ang

Conservative Journalist, Community Organizer, Businessman, Musician, Rancher, Dog Dad. Author of “The Minority Retort”

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

If you don't vote, I don't want to hear you ever complain about any of the filth, crime, or decline in LA again. Get off your butt and VOTE, or enjoy what you get.

[RedWave Press @RedWavePress]

Spencer Pratt LAYS DOWN THE LAW to Pothead Bill Maher: “I care about safety, the lights being on potholes. What a mayor should care about.”

Bill Maher: “Pot?”

Spencer Pratt: “If it's legal… I'm going to be enforcing… I don't want you smoking in front of kids at the park. I'll be enforcing if you're smoking that in front of a kid at a swing.”

“I’ll be getting you as mayor. No more drugs around kids at parks, in schools, in front of day cares, even if it's legal pot.”

“We need to have a society of consequences again. I never thought growing up I could smoke a blunt in front of a kid at the park. Now that happens.”

Common sense.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

An embarrassing self-own from Nithya in her commercial, where she actually reveals her "crowd of supporters" is just 30 paid actors packed into a closed set. LOL. I don't have to hire actors to get a crowd. All I have to do is show up, and real Angelenos step up. We are winning.

[James Woods @RealJamesWoods]

On the left is Spencer Pratt’s home. On the right is Jimmy Kimmel’s. Mr. Kimmel repeatedly violates FCC equal time election laws campaigning against Mr. Pratt on his late night political show. ABC’s defense is that Mr. Kimmel’s show is “comedy.”

They are also selling unicorns.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

This is my parents’ house. This is why I’m running. This is coming for your home. It’s coming for your industry. If not by fire, then by blight, addicts, fraud, and the slow rot created by corrupt politicians like Karen Bass. Wake up and VOTE.

[SNS 🇺🇸 @SNS_Anon]

The fact that “I’m not retarded” as a response to being called a Democrat survived every stage of production on a major television show tells you everything about where we’re at culturally.

We have normalized the word so much that major networks aren’t afraid to use it in their shows anymore, and it’s even being used to describe Democrats.

We are so back.

[Elizabeth Barcohana @E_Barcohana]

People keep asking @spencerpratt if he has “experience” to run LA

The only thing @KarenBassLA did in Congress before becoming Mayor was name a post office

Raman has a degree from MIT in Urban Planning and her district is a murder scene

I’ll take my chances on Spencer, thanks.

[jay plemons @jayplemons]

Spencer Pratt reveals the FireAid scam: $100 million raised for Palisades Fire victims… funneled to 200+ NGOs while homeowners got nothing.

@spencerpratt "That's when I learned firsthand that these NGOs will take, right in your face, $100 million and just steal it."

[Vince Langman @LangmanVince]

Whoever Spencer Pratt has putting together his commercials, every Republican running for office in the midterms needs to hire them today!

Here's another banger!👏

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 HOLY CRAP! LA mayor candidate Spencer Pratt just caught CBS engaging in ELECTION INTERFERENCE

He says they condensed a 1 hour interview into a “5 minute hit piece” after he WALLOPED Karen Bass

“They need to air the full, unedited interview.”

They KNOW Pratt is surging in LA

[Jason Rink @JasonRink]

The Erika Kirk situation is really just about one thing: authenticity.

Human beings are wired to distinguish authentic vs. inauthentic behavior.

We recognize it at a subconscious level.

Charlie occurred to people, even ones who didn't like him, as authentic.

Erika does not.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

I have not retracted a single claim I have made about Erika Kirk. Stop with the b.s Twitter trends. I stand by every single statement I have made and have not edited any of my past statements in light of Brian Harpole’s lawsuit.

I look forward to the power of subpoena.

[Hanz @fashionistaera]

Blake Lively is in full meltdown mode with the nonstop IG stories. Posting quotes from filings, trying very desperately to prove she didn’t lose like most people think she did. 😎

At this point someone should probably take her phone away because this crash out is not stopping.👀

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Everybody please congratulate me on Blake Lively’s psycho claims about Justin Baldoni being dismissed.

We worked really hard on that one.

In the end, truth wins.

🙌

[ELIZABETH LANE @imelizabethlane]

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is.

I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath.

What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain:

That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her.

Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.)

Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance.

Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity.

Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure.

Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power.

What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker.

Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride.

What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time.

In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks!

It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely!

Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing.

Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came.

What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion.

This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

I cannot explain it but I sense that this isn’t actually about me and that Tim Pool is under tremendous financial pressure.
Men behave a certain way when they are under economic pressure and I feel like he’s just lashing out and I happen to be here.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

RETWEET🔥
Thank you, Megyn Kelly for clarifying that Ben Shapiro quite literally lied to your face and to your audience about my words.
Rarely in politics do you see someone lie so brazenly in an effort to morally blackmail someone into their position.
Trying to equate questioning Turning Point USA employees about their verifiable lies to accusing Erika Kirk of murdering her own husband is a vile and obvious attempt to shut down further investigation.
And it will not work.

[Andy B @AndyB2189394279]

@libsoftiktok