Marxel is a modular AI-powered platform built for modern marketing teams, agencies, and brand managers to automate, orchestrate, and optimize content and brand
Don’t test AI screening with fake CVs.
Use one real role:
1. Upload the JD
2. Add briefing notes
3. Review the rubric
4. Run the CV stack
5. Compare against your manual shortlist
The point isn’t “is AI better?”
It’s “where does it disagree, and who’s right?”
ATS keyword filtering isn't screening. It's elimination theatre.
The candidate who wrote "talent acquisition" instead of "recruitment" got filtered out. The one who keyword-stuffed from 40 job specs got through.
You haven't narrowed the field. You've narrowed it arbitrarily.
The real hiring criteria never end up in the JD.
They live in the 45-minute call nobody transcribed properly.
Most shortlists fail because the brief lived in someone's head, not the spec.
Building a CV screening tool and the hardest part isn't the AI.
It's convincing hiring managers that "I'll just skim them" isn't a real screening process.
This isn't about replacing recruiters. It's about freeing them from 15+ hours of manual work per role so they can focus on what humans do best: relationship building.
The future isn't AI vs humans. It's AI + humans. 🤝
🧵 The AI hiring backlash is real. Here's why (and what it means for smart recruiters):
SHRM just reported that cost-per-hire AND time-to-hire have both INCREASED over the past 3 years.
This directly correlates with increased AI adoption in recruitment.
Wait, what? 🤔
The sweet spot? AI that acts as your "screening twin":
• Handles 200 CVs in minutes
• Provides clear reasoning
• Surfaces candidates you'd miss on page 6
• Leaves final decisions to you