Even active members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints may sometimes have concerns about some historical, doctrinal, or social issues connected with the Church. I want to help all our members overcome present or future doubts.
Whatever those doubts, the way to overcome them is to get closer to our Savior Jesus Christ. Again and again, He has taught us that He is the way.
@Eternal_Saints_@michaeljknowles Heartbroken over the LDS chapel tragedy. Michael Knowles is right—don’t use it to call us non-Christians. Our church, 2 Nephi 25:26: 'We talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ.'President Russell M. Nelson: 'We are Christians. We believe in Jesus Christ.'
Let’s unite, not divide.
Heartbroken over the LDS chapel tragedy. Michael Knowles is right—don’t use it to call us non-Christians. Our church, 2 Nephi 25:26: 'We talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ.' President Russell M. Nelson: 'We are Christians. We believe in Jesus Christ.'
Let’s unite, not divide.
Michael Knowles coming in with the correct take on Christians using the opportunity of a massacre at an LDS chapel to point out how you don’t think we’re real Christians. @michaeljknowles
We can’t bring Charlie Kirk back
Nor can we clone him
But in a broader sense we can replicate him—by striving daily to emulate his unique style and infectious love for America and the Constitution
The only substitute for Charlie Kirk is a few million “Charlie Kirks”
Who’s in?
If these are the last days, how can we stay safe and calm? How do we find peace? Where do we go if there is chaos?
The Lord has an answer for us in Doctrine and Covenants section 101.
🚨 URGENT: Congress is quietly advancing a provision that gives pesticide companies a free pass to poison America — and we need your voice now.
Sections 453, 457 and 507 buried in the House spending bill, would block federal agencies from updating pesticide safety standards — even if new science shows harm, or if the original data was fraudulent.
Here’s what’s at stake:
⚠️ Outdated EPA assessments stay in effect
⚠️ Cancer warnings can’t be added — even when risks are proven
⚠️ No lawsuits, no accountability — just corporate immunity
That means dangerous products could stay on the market with misleading labels — even if the company lied about the risks and covered up critical safety data. No one could be held accountable. It’s not just immunity from lawsuits. It’s immunity from the truth.
🛑 Tell Congress: REMOVE SECTIONS 453, 457 and 507.
Take 60 seconds to act:
https://t.co/hjfaLJE9DM
@glyphosategirl @standforhealthfreedom @momsacrossamerica @organicconsumers @earthjustice @earthjusticeaction @realfoodology
#StopSection453 #GWFAction #BanToxicChemicals #PesticideReform #GlyphosateTruth #GlobalWellnessForum
From 0 to porn in 13 seconds. That’s almost Tesla speed @elonmusk and @libsoftiktok.
The school Chromebook is safe, they tell parents.
We will be investigating porn access in Utah schools!
Turns out they did have something to hide.
This video was filmed June 2024, prior to the Primary. We had asked to see Cox‘s nomination petitions just like the LG‘s office allowed other petition packets to be seen. All our requests to see Cox’s packets were denied. No one was allowed to view these packets. There was a reason the LG hid this info from us.
Yesterday it was announced that 11 people are now charged with fraud related to the signature gathering. It’s a dirty business.
Two state audits found that Cox was short on signatures. These forgeries likely drop his validated numbers even further.
This is a big problem
Cox‘s camp said there are “thousands” of extra signatures. Where are they?
- The LG told us in June there were only 592 total extra unreviewed signatures
- The Legislative Audit said there are not 592, but only 492 unreviewed signatures
- The State Auditor said only 391 of those signatures are valid (but admitted they never actually audited them - they just relied on what the Davis Clerk reported)
This is the biggest story in the state right now!
#utpol
#exposecorruption
@realericmoutsos@finkd He has betrayed trust by avoiding responsibility for his involvement in COVID censorship, which would have prevented countless deaths.
From the very beginning, we would have disclosed that the shot was experimental rather than a true vaccine, as it alters our genetics.
Very concerning. In the first round of review, a district court judge ruled in favor of the lieutenant governor’s Motion to Dismiss our case to view the nomination petition of Spencer Cox. If left unappealed this would set a dangerous new precedent to allow the LG to continue to conceal the names on a nomination petition. Not only did the legislative auditor find Cox was short on signatures, but now the Court has ruled that we can’t even see the full petition. We are planning to appeal this case. It must be appealed.
Four critical errors and omissions in the Court’s holding:
1. The Court failed to recognize that we are seeking access to view a nominating petition. A petition is not a protected document under state code. No other petition signers are given anonymity.
2. The Court puts a lot of weight on the LG’s argument that the signer’s name should be private. However, it never addresses why it is ok for a different standard to be applied to the governor’s signatures than to signers of initiatives, referendums, and other candidates’ nominating petition forms.
The court failed to address why the LG’s office is able to selectively choose which names to conceal. If you signed the flag initiative, your name was published on the LG’s website even if you were a private or withheld voter. Inexplicably, the LG’s Office allowed access to view other candidates’ nomination petition forms.
3. The Court said it “inferred” that the intent of the Legislature was to hide these private names on a petition packet.
However, the court did not need to “infer” the legislators’ intent. It is clearly written in state code that private voters’ information will be available to “candidates” and “political parties.”
Why did the court fail to recognize the expressed intent of the legislators to make sure that private names are available to candidates? It is clearly written in the same section of code that the judge cited, but failed to include. The section of code saying that the candidate should have access to view private names was omitted in both the LG’s argument and by the judge. This omission is very concerning.
4. The Court said voters “specifically requested that their personal identifying information be kept private while they participate in the signature gathering process.” Where did this happen?? This language is not in state code, on the voter registration, or on the nominating petition. This language does not exist.
#utpol, #PhilLyman #electiontransparency, #exposecorruption