@famous_dyl@WayneFromTexass That is not proof. Both are creates off chain. But still both are larps. Its just a question of which better larp to chose. π₯΄
Until someone can correctly debunk this I am still convinced that
0x7fe3778b2520a5868fb8bc16fea0f33dd9e7122a
Is the correct POOLS contract address and I gave my explanation in the attached tweet.
I am very much open to being proven wrong so either join me in what I see as inevitable truth being brought into fruition, or prove me wrong.
Either way Iβm happy.
@0xSwims But i still truly believe the pools we have been pushing will be their official one. The first they created is messed up ticker, tpools lol. Hence they create the correct one right after.
@0xBANDAL@0xSwims But there was one whoch was created before it. And its at 5k. And the same structure. According to Gemini. It says it can be made to look that way as if X verified. By creating off chain. And Gemini looked the liquidity launcher and uerc20 factory. It is possible to forge that.
robinhood:0xD032E236991e8F728635153D4a37c9D3955b0bC8 @ Aug 05 2026 16:50:32 with a total of 1.2 ETH spent
&
robinhood:0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a @ Aug 05 2026 17:38:29 but no team allocation, both private keys signed by @tradepool by @uniswap's own xAuthenticator
robinhood:0xD032E236991e8F728635153D4a37c9D3955b0bC8 @ Aug 05 2026 16:50:32 with a total of 1.2 ETH spent
&
robinhood:0x7Fe3778B2520A5868fB8BC16FEa0f33dd9e7122a @ Aug 05 2026 17:38:29 but no team allocation, both private keys signed by @tradepool by @uniswap's own xAuthenticator
@0xSwims 0xd032e236991e8f728635153d4a37c9d3955b0bc8
This also have the same metadata like this one
0x7fe3778b2520a5868fb8bc16fea0f33dd9e7122a
It can all be by passed by creating off chain directly with the liquidity launcher and uniswap. All are larps. Fuck this shit.