You're reading this correctly: Dem nomination
Kamala Harris 37%
Gavin Newsom 17%
Pete Buttigieg 8%
AOC 7%
Mark Kelly 5%
Josh Shapiro 3%
Andy Beshear 3%
JB Pritzker 2%
By all means folks, proceed.
So… we’re expected to believe that in California, out of three candidates, the third place candidate, who conceded her campaign because she was mathematically eliminated from the run-off, suddenly received tens of thousands of votes from mail-in votes which all came in *after* Election Day, while the other two candidates received no late mail-in votes, and the second place candidate (who was surging as a Republican candidate in the bluest state in the country) is now in third place and mathematically eliminated from the run-off.
… and we’re supposed to trust that this is an honest and true election.
If you’re not angry about this, you need to be.
@SteveKrak Nothing to do with why anyone voted during the actual election. The post-election counting phase which is fundamentally anti-democratic is what is problematic - conceptually and now, actually, based on how improbable/ impossible the results.
Any election in which it’s forbidden by law to identify who is voting
AND mail ballots are automatically blasted out to every registered voter
AND voters are automatically registered with a drivers license
AND drivers licenses are given to noncitizens
AND its illegal for licensing authorities to ask for citizenship status
AND a massive political machine exists to ballot harvest for one party only
…is fundamentally illegitimate.
@bennyjohnson Serious question: Under what statutory authority do the Feds have jurisdiction over LA mayoral election? I want them to figure it out, desperately want answers, and local and state-level won't do it, so it's the federal govt by default. But by what authority?
nobody finds pratt’s loss suspicious. but when the distant third place candidate breaks down in tears on election night with what is basically a concession speech, then overwhelmingly dominates everyone for days in harvested mail-in ballots, yes that looks bad.
@marcthiessen The "let them stew in their own juice" feeling makes sense, but ignores trying to find the fraud. Are people already just giving up on diagnosing how they make this happen? Clearly not happening without intervention.
@LangmanVince Well he's going to try. He's only employable by NPR and MSNOW after all this. Even CNN won't touch him as it realigns to the center under Paramount ownership
A new California law bans:
1: Neutral election observers from challenging a ballot.
2: Law enforcement from enforcing election law.
3: Law enforcement from inspecting voting machines.
Of course California elections are corrupt! They literally made it illegal to enforce laws!
@libsoftiktok She didn’t actually “defeat” Spencer Pratt. she just accumulated enough clearly fake votes to appear to have more votes than him. When the forensics and statistical analysis of this are done, it will eviscerate any remaining faith in blue city/ state elections.
This shows 12,350 more votes for the LA mayor race than the high profile California Governor race. If anything you’d expect the opposite, as some people only vote for Governor but skip local races. The reverse is absurd. California elections seem as trustworthy as North Korea’s.
Tengo 58 años.
He vivido el fin de Franco. dos Reyes, cuatro Papas, la caida del Muro de Berlín, los mayores atentados en Europa y en USA, tres crisis económicas brutales y una pandemia trágica, la Dana, pero lo q nunca he visto ha sido a la izquierda creando riqueza y bienestar.