your miner rank can fall even when your own activity hasn't changed.
that's an interesting detail in @zerufinance's zETH race.
Zaps measures verified Ethereum activity, but miner rankings are relative.
your score reflects qualifying contributions. your position also depends on everyone competing against you.
when new participants connect wallets with years of onchain history, leaderboard positions can shift without anyone losing previously earned activity.
this creates an important transparency challenge.
users need to distinguish changes in their own scores from changes caused by competing wallets.
otherwise, a falling rank could encourage unnecessary transactions simply to recover position.
to me, ActivityFi needs explainable rankings, not just public leaderboards.
the value isn't knowing you're ranked #100. it's understanding what earned that position and why it changed.
connect your existing Ethereum wallets, review your counted Zaps and verify miner eligibility before the auction.
https://t.co/TBC6KycZCr