@NzT716@12Shakur I mean if you think it's more objective to base something from "may have" instead of factual race positions I don't have idea of what to say anymore
@12Shakur@NzT716 He was 3rd 3 laps before the lucky ass safety car just after George pitted lol are you guys ragebaiting or? (Piastri just pitted from 1st in the image)
@NzT716@F1GuyDan i dont agree with George being 4th in Silverstone because of the slow puncture, id say 3rd, Japan too is opinable since merc was clearly faster but overall i'd say it's good
@NzT716@F1GuyDan I understand the point you made but I attribute luck just on safety cars and mercedes' problems, dnfs by Verstappen or leclerc are really just part of the game. I'm not saying ant isn't faster atm, I'm just saying luck isn't on George's side either.
@NzT716@F1GuyDan its called math, rus -25 and ant goes from +18 to +25 , so net gain for ant is +32. in Spain you can do the opposite, -18 for ant and +3 for rus, cmon. Then if you Want to be precise about Canada i could say that Kimi was second when he had his problem
@NzT716@F1GuyDan Russell lost 20 points to Antonelli in Japan, 32 in canada, and 12 in Monaco, Antonelli lost 21 to Russell in Spain and 28 in GB, so yeah it wouldnt be 25, whatever lets you sleep better at night tho
@NzT716@F1GuyDan yeah now count Canada and Monaco and russell lost 40 points and Antonelli gained 7, and im not even counting the safety car timing in Japan so yeah, you are delusional if you genuinely think that