Excited to share the launch of Tau Ceti, a new library of AI-formalized mathematics in Lean, with human-curated roadmaps and adversarial review against open rubrics.
Tau Ceti: https://t.co/D2vJ87Bl79
Review rubrics: https://t.co/jJYpQQwVrx
Roadmaps: https://t.co/QmdWFQar2h
Zulip discussion: https://t.co/Ia2tjjv98a
Tau Ceti sits downstream of Mathlib, the gold standard for human-curated mathematics in Lean. It aims for reusable code others can build on, not the "perfection of knowledge" role Mathlib plays.
Mathematicians contribute roadmaps; AIs implement the formal mathematics and review each other's work against evolving rubrics. Contributors can use the project's tools or their own.
We're glad to co-incubate Tau Ceti alongside Kim Morrison and the Mathlib Initiative. New roadmaps, roadmap review, and AI contributors are all welcome.
#LeanLang #LeanProver #Mathlib #AI #Mathematics
In today's press conference, we explained our efforts over the last two years which resulted in the following conclusion: The way the argument from Theorem 3.11 to Corollary 3.12 is written in the IUT papers is unformalizable. But since Mochizuki's explanation of this point has recently started evolving, we reserve final judgement at this time.
Among the key achievements LANA demonstrated at this press conference was that we provide a manageable-length analysis of the critical argument in the IUT theory for the general mathematical public, written by outsiders.
This document also includes a comparison with the 2018 Scholze-Stix report.
YouTube video: https://t.co/JB3jKwXzPe
LANA report:
https://t.co/pZeHJirbUO
In today's press conference, we explained our efforts over the last two years which resulted in the following conclusion: The way the argument from Theorem 3.11 to Corollary 3.12 is written in the IUT papers is unformalizable. But since Mochizuki's explanation of this point has recently started evolving, we reserve final judgement at this time.
Among the key achievements LANA demonstrated at this press conference was that we provide a manageable-length analysis of the critical argument in the IUT theory for the general mathematical public, written by outsiders.
This document also includes a comparison with the 2018 Scholze-Stix report.
YouTube video: https://t.co/JB3jKwXzPe
LANA report:
https://t.co/pZeHJirbUO
Dr. Paul Erdős was one of the most prolific mathematicians in history, publishing around 1,500 papers with 511 unique collaborators.
An Erdős number measures the collaborative distance between a researcher and Erdős. Having an Erdős number of 1 means you co-authored a mathematical paper directly with him.
It is a legendary badge of honour because Erdős was a brilliant genius who only worked with world-class minds, making a Erdos Number 1 an exclusive, lifelong mark of elite mathematical achievement.
A total of 21 Indian Elite Mathematical scientists had directly collaborated with the genius Dr Paul Erdos.
" I am a Chennai Boy" What a disgrace Shivanna! ಅಣ್ಣಾವ್ರಿಗೆ ನೀವೇ ಅವಮಾನ ಮಾಡಿಬಿಟ್ರಿ. ಕನ್ನಡದ ವಿಷಯದಲ್ಲಿ ತಮಿಳರನ್ನು ಎದುರಾಕಿಕೊಂಡು ಹೋರಾಟ ಮಾಡಿದ ಅಣ್ಣಾವ್ರ ಮಗ ಇಂದು ತಮಿಳರಿಗೆ ಬಕೆಟು. ಹಾಗೆ ನೋಡಿದರೆ ದರ್ಶನೇ ಪರವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ. ಅದೇನು ತಮಿಳು ವ್ಯಾಮೋಹವೋ.
Rush hour in Malleshwara is highly unlikely. It is not a tech hub. Most who walk around are there at leisure.
Folks are manufacturing stories for they can’t bear poor making a living.
"Basic Mathematics" by Serge Lang is an excellent book for readers who want to build solid mathematical foundations.
It covers algebra, geometry, trigonometry, complex numbers, matrices, and other introductory topics with clarity and rigor. It is a very useful resource for readers who are approaching advanced mathematics for the first time.
https://t.co/dQbi7mfokx