@AcerFur We have no desire to start a civil war or silence mathematicians with more critical perspectives. We value pluralism. We would just like to show that many mathematicians are looking forward to using AI.
I'm happy to announce two important letters on AI and mathematics.
1. A timely letter on the recent AI advances in mathematics : https://t.co/bjWYeyqiJR
2. A general letter on math+AI: https://t.co/3lvqoUQkuI
Signatures open to any mathematician with a university affiliation!
The first letter, open to signatures from mathematicians with an academic affiliation, calls for @OpenAI to release the 100+ solutions as soon as possible.
@Quasilocal@ElliotGlazer Personally I don't think this is likely anytime soon, and I think the centaur period will last a while.
The "digestion" clause is that we should *prepare* for such a "worst-case" scenario, not that such a scenario is likely in the near future.
@DocOctagonical There are various legitimate concerns about AI-generated solutions, and it's hard to put them all in an open letter. For better or for worse, OAI has a strong monetary incentive not to publicize its failures.
In any case there are two letters, you can sign exactly one of them.
@ElliotGlazer Note that we say that mathematicians should *prepare* for this future, not that it is the only possible outcome or even the most likely outcome. But more importantly we discuss how currently this is not the case and humans should collaborate with AIs.
@OpenAI The second letter, also open to signatures from mathematicians with an academic affiliation, is a more general statement about the potential for AI to enrich mathematics.
The first letter, open to signatures from mathematicians with an academic affiliation, calls for @OpenAI to release the 100+ solutions as soon as possible.