@sAugust06@elonmusk@ramzpaul I disagree. Those people should remain publicly visible rather than be driven underground, so we can identify them and their activity can be monitored.
Social media shouldn't be policing "misinformation" in any direction. It should just be countered with better information.
@thecoastguy They already claim it was voluntary. All while being threatened and coerced. These people must also consider sex to be consensual even if a gun to one's child's head is involved.
@ZubyMusic That the U.S. government and social media companies were coordinating to censor dissent on the official narrative, regardless of what was provably true.
@ZubyMusic It's horrifying that the same authorities that instituted these senseless rules, also assumed the power to dictate injections into everyone's body.
@PeterSweden7 Last year during a heated discussion on discrimination against the unvaxed, an educated family member dismissed my request for any justification for her agreement that the covid vax stops spread, saying "I'm not going to prove to you the earth is round."
@HotepJesus People without a blue checkmark are just folks who are not that invested in being seen and heard. Lots of people are on twitter to browse without necessarily needing people to follow what they have to say.
@chartconsultllc @QueenMaureenGC @seerutkchawla There could also conceivably be real-world consequences to your banking situation for expressing "bad" opinions too. Weird how people were concerned about social media authoritarianism before, now willing to link their banking identity to their online speech.
@brysongray@elonmusk No human is 100% without bias. The best scenario for creating balance would be to have a team of people who are from all sides of the political spectrum.
@iDoLikeSpam@JosephWulfsohn Agreed. And going forward there should be analytics into how many times politicians have been shamed into deleting/retracting lies. On all sides. This is how politicians should be held accountable.
So... the liberal position is that their political opponents' rhetoric is misinformation/leads to violence, and therefore must be censored by liberals who are themselves never misinformed/stoking violence?